Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

Header question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 19, 2007 | 12:49 PM
  #46  
jhardee's Avatar
jhardee
Freshman User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Columbia,S.C.
just to add my 2cents I have a set of pace setter headers "bought as the summit brand" and the flange to tube welds were so tall and bogger welded they leaked like crazy i even took a grinder to 'em smoothed em out and used copper crush gaskets and still had a leak at the back top corners of at least three cylinders. but maybe i just got a swag set.
 
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 07:26 PM
  #47  
Hawk180's Avatar
Hawk180
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
I have used different brands of headers for different applications and I have found that the overall best value for the dollar is Hooker. They are usually somewhat tuned and made for a specific engine. Example they have different headers for the 302 engine than the 351, even though they could build a set for the 351 and sell it also to fit the 302. They won't do that. Also their workmanship is very good for mass produced products. There are better headers out there, but you will pay a big premium for them. You then have to ask yourself, Is it worth it to you to pay twice the price for a 5% gain? The quality I get for Hookers is well worth the price and they stand behind their products. At least they have for me.
 
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 11:30 PM
  #48  
second chance's Avatar
second chance
Junior User
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow,Ky.
Where in the world does a new member sighn up? I know I am very computer illiterate but I'm trying!!!!
 
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 11:35 PM
  #49  
second chance's Avatar
second chance
Junior User
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow,Ky.
Thank you for your welcome!!!late as usuall
 
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 11:51 PM
  #50  
Hawk180's Avatar
Hawk180
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Skandocious
Seems like the most popular (and with most success stories) performance mods on this forum include:

-free flowing exhaust (including hi-flow cats or no cats)
-K&N intake
-electric fan
-regearing the diffs
-roller rockers
-RV cam
-headers

Hope that helps!

-Chris
A good multi-spark ignition works wonders as well. I have realized a 3.5 mpg gain and quite a bit of torque by adding that to my truck. Accel makes a kit that is pretty much plug and play for about $250.00. You have to use resistor plugs though, the RF interference with copper plugs is too much for the stock EEC computer.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2007 | 01:31 AM
  #51  
Skandocious's Avatar
Skandocious
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,816
Likes: 1
From: Davis & Newcastle, CA
Originally Posted by Hawk180
A good multi-spark ignition works wonders as well. I have realized a 3.5 mpg gain and quite a bit of torque by adding that to my truck. Accel makes a kit that is pretty much plug and play for about $250.00. You have to use resistor plugs though, the RF interference with copper plugs is too much for the stock EEC computer.
I ALMOST added that to my list, but there was a thread about it a couple days ago with a lot of guys mentioning that the multi-spark setup (MSD 6 Off-Road in this case) is pretty useless on a truck that isn't heavily modded. You're the 2nd person that I have seen on here that loves their multi-spark setup, versus about 15 guys that all said it was useless. Not saying you're wrong, just saying maybe its not worth the gamble for that amount of money. Glad it worked out for you!

-Chris
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2007 | 08:19 PM
  #52  
second chance's Avatar
second chance
Junior User
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow,Ky.
Thanks for the answer guys, It looks like something should help some. I can live with 8to10 miles a gallon while I'm towing if I don't fall to 50 mph on the hills,and 70 top speed and that was with about 2500 pounds max behind me. This truck has 15000 miles on it(95 model) and the engine only about 3000, so I know its not tired.Its a 30 over 302 runs good and smooth seems peppy empty but the milage and pulling are not where I think they should be.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2007 | 08:29 PM
  #53  
entity's Avatar
entity
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
so your saying that the engine is bored out etc. and your expecting mileage? lol.. last i checked except for certain few sports cars and sport sedans, most hipo trucks do not get very good fuel economy, there meant to use to work and be a tad more tuff than your standard car or suv.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old May 20, 2007 | 10:59 PM
  #54  
second chance's Avatar
second chance
Junior User
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow,Ky.
Thats my point, it is completly stock except for the bore, and the exhaust which is a 70 series flowmaster. I don't think that could be classified as hipo when its a 302. The truck is a 5 speed and on some hills I went all the way to 3rd gear on the interstate(not very steep hills) I may be expecting too much, but for the fuel it uses I would like a better return in power. I don't know what to compare it to except for my last truck and it falls way short of it in both. I guess what I'm hunting is it doing all its going to do or is something wrong?
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2007 | 11:37 PM
  #55  
Hawk180's Avatar
Hawk180
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Skandocious
I ALMOST added that to my list, but there was a thread about it a couple days ago with a lot of guys mentioning that the multi-spark setup (MSD 6 Off-Road in this case) is pretty useless on a truck that isn't heavily modded. You're the 2nd person that I have seen on here that loves their multi-spark setup, versus about 15 guys that all said it was useless. Not saying you're wrong, just saying maybe its not worth the gamble for that amount of money. Glad it worked out for you!

-Chris
I went with the Accel system that is designed for the street with a stock or mildly modified engine. It is designed to produce spark over 20 degrees crankshaft rotation. It is also designed to work with and augment the stock computer. The Off-Road version from MSD would be useless on the street as it is designed for a racing application where the engine stays in a fairly narrow RPM band. I have used that system on oval track engines with good results, but I cannot imagine it working well on the street. With the Hooker long tube headers, free breathing exhaust and Accel ignition kit, I have increased my fuel economy to around 17 mpg from 12.5 and notice an impressive increase in torque. I am thinking of roller rockers, but don't really expect dramatic results. From here on out the law of diminishing returns kicks in and each small gain will not be justified by the dollars spent. That's when it becomes this guy thing of upgrading a part for the cool factor.
 

Last edited by Hawk180; May 20, 2007 at 11:42 PM.
Reply
Old May 20, 2007 | 11:42 PM
  #56  
Skandocious's Avatar
Skandocious
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,816
Likes: 1
From: Davis & Newcastle, CA
Originally Posted by Hawk180
I went with the Accel system that is designed for the street with a stock or mildly modified engine. It is designed to produce spark over 20 degrees crankshaft rotation. It is also designed to work with and augment the stock computer. The Off-Road version from MSD would be useless on the street as it is designed for a racing application where the engine stays in a fairly narrow RPM band. I have used that system on oval track engines with good results, but I cannot imagine it working well on the street.
Very interesting. And is your gas mileage decreased? How much did it cost you? Is the power gain real noticable? Have you done any other mods?

-Chris
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2007 | 11:47 PM
  #57  
Hawk180's Avatar
Hawk180
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
My mileage went up about 4.5 mpg. The torque numbers I don't really know because I don't have access to a dyno. The greatest increase I noticed is on the bottom end from idle to about 2500 rpm. After than it does run smoother and has better throttle response, but the 351 runs well anyway. I don't really know how much faster the truck is as I don't run it on top end. I will say that it does pass much better and is smoother at highway speeds. It also pulls better.
 
Reply
Old May 21, 2007 | 12:06 AM
  #58  
Skandocious's Avatar
Skandocious
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,816
Likes: 1
From: Davis & Newcastle, CA
Wow 4.5 mpg better?! Which part, where did you buy, and how much? I found this on summit, is this it??

http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku

You've got me intrigued now.

-Chris
 
Reply
Old May 21, 2007 | 12:13 AM
  #59  
second chance's Avatar
second chance
Junior User
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow,Ky.
Thanks for the info Hawk. Can you tell me the model number of that ign. system? Can you recommend any other changes?
 
Reply
Old May 21, 2007 | 07:57 PM
  #60  
Hawk180's Avatar
Hawk180
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Yeas that is the one. I also have the Hooker 6912-1hkr headers, a 3-inch inlet and outlet high flow cat and a 50 series Flowmaster muffler with 3 inch single exhaust. I am thinking of a set of roller rockers, but as I said, it gets into the "I want it 'cause I don't have one" attitude.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:26 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE