Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

Header question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 17, 2007 | 12:40 AM
  #16  
Skandocious's Avatar
Skandocious
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,816
Likes: 1
From: Davis & Newcastle, CA
Originally Posted by joshdvirnak
Thats what I thought was MAF, the two into one. I should have been more clear, I meant two tubes between the filter box and the intake. I have two separate tubes, I am doing more research now, but from what I thought that was speed density, but it is a 95... hmm... interesting...

Edit: After some more research, I found that even though they started MAF in 94, most of the 351s didnt get it until 96. Chris, your truck wouldnt happen to be a california truck, would it? California models had MAF earlier due to their tighter standards.
Yes sir it is, California pride baby! That will explain why you don't have MAF

-Chris
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2007 | 12:48 AM
  #17  
nobodyspecial's Avatar
nobodyspecial
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,635
Likes: 0
From: The Wilderness
Its not a big deal that it doesnt have it, there are a lot of people that do all of the basic intake, exhaust, ignition mods on speed densitys with no problems. when they start to have problems is when the engine size is increased.

As I understand, with speed density, it uses a programmed in setting for how much air the engine is using at a specific RPM. the computer then tells it how much fuel it needs. the O2 sensor tells the computer if it is rich or lean and the computer adjusts from there. it can adjust up to 25%, the problems start when the engine is bored or stroked. the O2 sensor says its running lean, but the computer cant compensate enough.

So, unless you are going to be doing a ton of high performance mods, a speed density truck should be just fine.

somebody correct me if I am wrong, or give me a pat on the back if I am right
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2007 | 12:59 AM
  #18  
nobodyspecial's Avatar
nobodyspecial
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,635
Likes: 0
From: The Wilderness
Check out this link, http://fordfuelinjection.com/?p=4

It defines the different Fuel injection types, and gives benefits and downfalls of each kind. such as MAF will sense changes in engine, but SD reacts to throttle change sooner. It shows that Speed Density is not as evil as everyone thinks it is, and MAF isnt as perfect as everyone thinks it is. It even says SD can handle more power than MAF... Interesting... its a give and take thing. very good reading
 

Last edited by joshdvirnak; May 17, 2007 at 01:03 AM.
Reply
Old May 17, 2007 | 01:13 AM
  #19  
nobodyspecial's Avatar
nobodyspecial
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,635
Likes: 0
From: The Wilderness
Well, I feel bad about hijacking this thread, so...

back on topic, Entity, if you are planning on doing the exhaust your self, I know that they make a header reducer that bolts right up to a set of long tube headers that already has a O2 sensor bung on it, and then you just start putting the pipes on after that.

http://store.summitracing.com/partdetail.asp?autofilter=1&part=WLK-88313&N=700+400358+4294865471+115&autoview=sku

I have all of my pieces picked out for when I purchase my headers and exhaust, and I am gonna buy these, i know I could have a bung put on, but I am doing the exhaust myself and its easy this way
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2007 | 01:19 AM
  #20  
eco's Avatar
eco
Posting Guru
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,263
Likes: 1
From: The dark carnival
Originally Posted by joshdvirnak
the problems start when the engine is bored or stroked. the O2 sensor says its running lean, but the computer cant compensate enough.

So, unless you are going to be doing a ton of high performance mods, a speed density truck should be just fine.

somebody correct me if I am wrong, or give me a pat on the back if I am right
A bone stock 302 with this cam would not even run w/ speed density:

Power range - Idle to 4400 rpm
Intake lift - .448
Exhaust lift - .478
Intake duration adv. - 280
Exhaust duration adv. - 290
Intake duration @ .50 - 204
Exhaust duration @ .50 - 214
Intake lobe centerline - 107
Exhaust lobe centerline - 117

This cam is nothing radical.

It's my experiance that it don't take much to get out of the limits of speed density. Anything that alters the volumetric effieciency of the motor can throw the SD system out of wack.
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2007 | 01:25 AM
  #21  
nobodyspecial's Avatar
nobodyspecial
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,635
Likes: 0
From: The Wilderness
Not wanting to get back off topic, but to answer your question, Ryan at fordfuelinjection aparently knows a lot about these systems and says that what really messes up speed density is increased displacement or to much air, which creates a lean state that throws it off, I will be the first to say that I dont know much about cams at all. what would that cam do to the air/fuel ratio? check out that link I posted, it answered a ton of questions I had about MAF and speed density.
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2007 | 01:29 AM
  #22  
Skandocious's Avatar
Skandocious
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,816
Likes: 1
From: Davis & Newcastle, CA
Eco you forgot about the Side Channeling Thunder-Flarable Flange Compensation Rating... What were stats for that? Love bein a smart ***. This is just my way of saying you've gone WAY over my head

-Chris
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2007 | 01:40 AM
  #23  
eco's Avatar
eco
Posting Guru
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,263
Likes: 1
From: The dark carnival
The guy's at FFI do know alot, I have talked to them a few times. Thats where I got all my EGR eliminator parts.

I don't fully understand what exactly that cam does that throws off the SD system, but it has someting to do with the lobe centerline being too low. I have been told that lobe centerline needs to be at ~114. That is the cam in my 302 and it would not run @ less than 1500 rpm without extra fuel... be it an increase in fuel pressure, propane added to the air intake or what ever. It leaned the motor out big time.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-3

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-4

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-6

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

Ford Super Duty: 5 Things Owners LOVE, 5 Things They LOATHE!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Every 2026 Ford Truck Engine RANKED from WORST to FIRST!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

The Best F-150 Deal of Every Trim Level (XL through Raptor)

 Joe Kucinski
Old May 17, 2007 | 01:47 AM
  #24  
Skandocious's Avatar
Skandocious
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,816
Likes: 1
From: Davis & Newcastle, CA
Eco I assume thats a typo in your signature. You're not driving a van are you? E-150? LOL

-Chris
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2007 | 01:53 AM
  #25  
eco's Avatar
eco
Posting Guru
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,263
Likes: 1
From: The dark carnival
Originally Posted by Skandocious
Eco I assume thats a typo in your signature. You're not driving a van are you? E-150? LOL

-Chris
No typo, I do drive an E-150. I hate trucks! I just hang around here because there arn't many differences at all between the truck and the van and there is NO ACTION in the van forum. Why would you ASSUME it's a typo?
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2007 | 07:21 AM
  #26  
second chance's Avatar
second chance
Junior User
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow,Ky.
OK I stand corrected I was going by what I was told on the OBDs. When I got mine it had a short pipe in the front of the system which had the o2 sensor in it. It was in front of the converters. I don't know where it came from but it seems to me you know whats is supposed to be there and mine is not original. Thanks for the comments.
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2007 | 09:14 AM
  #27  
nobodyspecial's Avatar
nobodyspecial
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,635
Likes: 0
From: The Wilderness
Second Chance, could you describe this "short pipe" for me, I am not clear on what you are describing. because on my truck, there is a "short pipe" the connects both of the pipes right before they enter the first cat. converter.

how long is the pipe you are talking about?
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2007 | 09:19 AM
  #28  
Skandocious's Avatar
Skandocious
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,816
Likes: 1
From: Davis & Newcastle, CA
Originally Posted by second chance
OK I stand corrected I was going by what I was told on the OBDs. When I got mine it had a short pipe in the front of the system which had the o2 sensor in it. It was in front of the converters. I don't know where it came from but it seems to me you know whats is supposed to be there and mine is not original. Thanks for the comments.
You're welcome. Let us know how those headers work out, I'm thinkin of putting some on my truck.

And eco, I just assumed it was a typo because 1) you're on the truck forum and 2) because you have all those engine mods! I've never heard or seen of someone tricking up a Ford E Van. Ultimate sleeper I guess. Does it look cool?

-Chris
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2007 | 03:57 PM
  #29  
second chance's Avatar
second chance
Junior User
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow,Ky.
Maybe 4 inches, it goes from one manifold down pipe to the other with the o2 sensor in the middle. It is located just after the left manifold pipe comes over to the right side. It appears to be factory, if not I sure would like to learn a few tricks from the welder that built it.
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2007 | 04:09 PM
  #30  
nobodyspecial's Avatar
nobodyspecial
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,635
Likes: 0
From: The Wilderness
That is exactly the same thing I have, and yes, that is factory
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:45 PM.

story-0
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-2
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-3
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-6
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
Ford Super Duty: 5 Things Owners LOVE, 5 Things They LOATHE!

Slideshow: Ranking the 5 things owners love about their Super Duty and 5 things they don't

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:36:49


VIEW MORE
story-8
Every 2026 Ford Truck Engine RANKED from WORST to FIRST!

Slideshow: Ranking all 12 Ford truck engines available in 2026.

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 13:32:20


VIEW MORE
story-9
The Best F-150 Deal of Every Trim Level (XL through Raptor)

Slideshow: The best Ford F-150 deal for every trim level (XL through Raptor)

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-21 15:59:01


VIEW MORE