Notices
2004 - 2008 F150 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 Ford F150's with 5.4 V8, 4.6 V8 engine
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

O/D off

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 16, 2007 | 08:30 PM
  #16  
fordtruckman's Avatar
fordtruckman
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 3
From: Kzoo
I got that scanguage 2 and mounted it on my dash and if im driving down the road and turn the o/d off my mileage will drop from 17.5ish to about 14.9/15.5 no matter if im towing, snow plowing or on the highway whenever i turn the O/D off my gas mileage will get worse but if i turn it off ill also have a heck of a lot more torque which is helpful when towing and snowplowing.
 
Reply
Old May 16, 2007 | 09:21 PM
  #17  
VFR_Man's Avatar
VFR_Man
Elder User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 662
Likes: 2
From: CO
Originally Posted by ()smoke()
does an engine draw in more air and or fuel when running at higher rpms?
The amount of work being done by the engine will be the biggest factor in air/fuel consumption. Take an 8% grade hill. The engine may only be able to pull up the hill at 60 mph in top gear, but coming down it can probably coast at 80 mph or better, burning practically no fuel compared to the trip up the hill even though the engine is turning a higher rpm.

Originally Posted by ()smoke()
...how can a faster running engine draw in less air and or fuel?
Not sure if my previous analogy answered your questions or not. If you're posing the same question for an engine doing the same work under both conditions, then it boils down to engine efficiency at the two different rpm's. Lugging the engine is not going to use the fuel as efficiently as it will in its sweet spot on the torque curve.
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2007 | 04:14 AM
  #18  
eli98's Avatar
eli98
Junior User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ()smoke()
when an engine lacks torque at low rpms, it's necessary to use more throttle to generate higher rpms to generate more torque to turn the taller axle gears, ie 3.42 being taller than 4.10...i'm in agreement...i also understand the premise of 'lugging' an engine vs driving it in the powerband, so i agree there too

my question isn't as involved:

does an engine draw in more air and or fuel when running at higher rpms?

or phrased another way: if opening the throttle (letting in more air) results in a engine running faster, how can a faster running engine draw in less air and or fuel?

just trying to understand the details
It has to do with throttle position. Drive a manual around in 5th gear at 20 mph, and note your throttle position to overcome the drag resistance. Now drive it around in second gear, less throttle, less FUEL (including air). The only way to make an engine accelerate is to add more fuel than in the previous revolution. If you are driving around in to tall a gear the engine will drag down, to which you will respond by either adding more fuel, or reducing the drag (downshift). Think of it this way, if you pull a trailer with 4000lbs on it does your mileage not decrease? That's because you've increased the drag coefficient, and to compensate you need more power (ie. more fuel). You're still in overdrive, still at same engine speed, but heavier on the throttle. Starts and stops added to overdrive are like as taking off in third (with a manual) and shifting to fifth by 15mph. You have to really hit the throttle to keep from stalling out, and stay on it for acceleration.

Originally Posted by fordtruckman
I got that scanguage 2 and mounted it on my dash and if im driving down the road and turn the o/d off my mileage will drop from 17.5ish to about 14.9/15.5 no matter if im towing, snow plowing or on the highway whenever i turn the O/D off my gas mileage will get worse but if i turn it off ill also have a heck of a lot more torque which is helpful when towing and snowplowing.
That meters the vehicles instantaneous fuel mileage, and is programmed to "think" you have lost mileage by removing the over drive.

Overdrive definately has its place, more often than not its beneficial, but it can be a hinderance to mileage as well and the original post is proof that it can happen.
 

Last edited by eli98; May 17, 2007 at 04:19 AM.
Reply
Old May 17, 2007 | 07:12 AM
  #19  
Cuisinart's Avatar
Cuisinart
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ()smoke()
does an engine draw in more air and or fuel when running at higher rpms?

or phrased another way: if opening the throttle (letting in more air) results in a engine running faster, how can a faster running engine draw in less air and or fuel?

just trying to understand the details
In the first part of your question, the answer is simply yes when operated with no load, higher RPMs = more fuel/air, but when you add load and gearing into it, it's not so simple (and others have already explained it here).

To answer the second part; well it would depend on a lot of variables but if you are speaking of just the engine alone with no load, then typically this would only happen during the time after you close the throttle and the engine is winding down.
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2007 | 07:42 AM
  #20  
is300wrx's Avatar
is300wrx
Posting Guru
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 0
From: Oxford, CT
Whenever I am doing under 60mph, I keep O/D off. turn it on when I go over that speed. By doing so, I am getting 345-350miles to the tank...Before when i just kept O/D on the whoel time, I was getting close to 300-305miles. Huge improvement! This is with the Edge Tuned at level 2 and volant intake with flow*******s40s to balance out the bigger 33" tires I have.
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2007 | 08:09 AM
  #21  
()smoke()'s Avatar
()smoke()
Junior User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by VFR_Man
The amount of work being done by the engine will be the biggest factor in air/fuel consumption. Take an 8% grade hill. The engine may only be able to pull up the hill at 60 mph in top gear, but coming down it can probably coast at 80 mph or better, burning practically no fuel compared to the trip up the hill even though the engine is turning a higher rpm.


Not sure if my previous analogy answered your questions or not. If you're posing the same question for an engine doing the same work under both conditions, then it boils down to engine efficiency at the two different rpm's. Lugging the engine is not going to use the fuel as efficiently as it will in its sweet spot on the torque curve.
thanks, that helps better explain the idea

how does an engine physically consume more air/fuel when it's under load but at the same rpm? would the cylinder volume remain constant? is variable valve timing the difference?

just picking the brains of you guys with more knowledge of the subject, as it's quite interesting

thanks
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2007 | 08:20 AM
  #22  
()smoke()'s Avatar
()smoke()
Junior User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
and just so it's clear, i'm not not in disagreement with you guys

it's more of a why is the sky blue question for me
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2007 | 08:58 AM
  #23  
Cuisinart's Avatar
Cuisinart
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ()smoke()
thanks, that helps better explain the idea

how does an engine physically consume more air/fuel when it's under load but at the same rpm? would the cylinder volume remain constant? is variable valve timing the difference?

just picking the brains of you guys with more knowledge of the subject, as it's quite interesting

thanks
That one is easy, I kinda already answered it. Your intake manifold is at a vacuum. This allows your throttle body to meter the amount of air allowed in and your injectors will squirt in more or less fuel based on the throttle position. Thus you can let in more fuel/air mix at the same rpm to make bigger explosions in your cylinders which makes more power to do more work at the same rpm.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-2

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-3

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-4

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-9

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
Old May 17, 2007 | 09:13 AM
  #24  
VFR_Man's Avatar
VFR_Man
Elder User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 662
Likes: 2
From: CO
Yep, just think of the cylinders as being "starved" at anything less than WOT. Throttle position and thus vacuum level will determine their level of starvation.
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2007 | 12:10 PM
  #25  
()smoke()'s Avatar
()smoke()
Junior User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
now i see how the vacuum within the intake manifold plays into things--you did answer this, but i didn't understand it at the time

with this, my understanding is that the throttle controls the volume of air allowed into the intake at any position except WOT, and that if a larger load is placed on the engine, then a larger volume of air and proportionally larger amount of fuel are required to create the larger explosion required to move the piston against said larger load--so rather than immediately introducing higher rpms, the larger volume of fuel mixture introduces more energy per combustion until the energy per combustion exceeds that required to move the load, at which point the rpms would increase--fair assessment?

if i'm understanding it correctly, it's clear why lower rpms against a load would result in inefficiency when the amount of fuel expended to push the load at lower rpms exceeds the amount of fuel expended to create high enough rpms to produce the power to push the load equally (where gearing comes into play)
 

Last edited by ()smoke(); May 17, 2007 at 12:13 PM.
Reply
Old May 17, 2007 | 03:55 PM
  #26  
Cuisinart's Avatar
Cuisinart
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
By jove, I think you've got it
 
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2007 | 05:18 PM
  #27  
91hybrid's Avatar
91hybrid
New User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: kansas
The in town milage increase has to do with torque converter lock up. In OD the torque converter will not lock up unil 45 mph, in drive it will lock up at 40mph. Atleast in my '04 with the edge. All the in town speed limits in my town are 35 mph, so I drive 40. With the torque converter spinning I waste alot of energy slipping the converter and in fact run higher rpms in OD than in drive because the converter is not locking in OD compared to converter lock in drive.

John
 
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2007 | 10:37 PM
  #28  
Bluegrass 7's Avatar
Bluegrass 7
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,907
Likes: 143
At 45 mph in OD, the engine is so far down in it's torque curve that there is hardly any throttle reponse from opeing the throttle.
However, opening the throttle more under these conditions still uses more fuel without going much faster (covering distance).
There is the loss you are seeing in fuel mileage.
Said another way, you are not getting the use out of the fuel consumed that you would under a somewhat higher rpm and better torque production.
There is a crossover point in all this that can keep shifting as loading on the motor changes.
There is no definative answer to rely on due to the varying conditions.
45 mph in city or town driving, usually is never very far at a time unless there is a main street with no lights or stops and police to run you down for going over the limit.
A proper operating tranmission would not upshift for very long under these stop and go conditions.
That 'there' OD switch is there for your to use.
The function is restored when the motor is restarted every time.
The switch signals the PCM and not the transmission. It is an inhibit function on the PCM only. This is why the PCM cancels it on restart.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
eatont9999
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
14
Aug 14, 2011 09:57 AM
Chris.Brame
1997 - 2003 F150
4
May 20, 2011 09:04 AM
429law
Clutch, Transmission, Differential, Axle & Transfer Case
8
May 4, 2010 08:03 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:44 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-1
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-3
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-6
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-9
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE