Engine Swap
MMNC (SS)(Ret)
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 11,602
Likes: 147
From: SE Georgia
Originally Posted by Crazy001
I've never driven the 4.6; I went from my '03s V6 to my '07s 5.4, and I love the extra power, but the V6 did just fine. Keep in mind, all that extra acceleration you're looking for comes at the expense of gas mileage.
but, where is USMarine10?...he's only made the 2 posts? maybe his idea is.....STUPID
Post Fiend
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 12,281
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon Saskatchewan
Yeah the 351 was rated for less horsepower but defientelys got more get up and go than a 4.6 in my opinion mine is a daily driver and i get pretty dam good mileage dont know exactly but i know if drive very nice which i do all the time its not as thirsty
Weird man 3.0 those are in rangers yours should of been 4.2 unless swapped out but yeah the v6 gotta work harder to move the big truck
Weird man 3.0 those are in rangers yours should of been 4.2 unless swapped out but yeah the v6 gotta work harder to move the big truck
MMNC (SS)(Ret)
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 11,602
Likes: 147
From: SE Georgia
well, I was wrong about that 3.0...my dad had said that was the motor it was, but after doing a little searching, it doesn't appear to have been an option.
The 5.8 has alot more torque seat wise than the 4.6...but not HP. That would be a plum dumb swap. Maybe a bored out 302...but still more effort than worth.
The 5.8 has alot more torque seat wise than the 4.6...but not HP. That would be a plum dumb swap. Maybe a bored out 302...but still more effort than worth.
Last edited by Tylus; May 14, 2007 at 11:10 PM. Reason: my stupidity
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gear619
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
16
Mar 13, 2020 07:50 AM
Red454sedgwick
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
4
Dec 26, 2015 07:06 PM
porchy's 69 f100
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
8
Dec 6, 2014 09:30 PM
