6.4L Power Stroke Diesel Engine fitted to 2008 - 2010 F250, F350 and F450 pickup trucks and F350 + Cab Chassis

The "fun" continues

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 05-03-2007, 06:40 PM
Nathan C's Avatar
Nathan C
Nathan C is offline
New User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Want reliable power get a CAT!!
 
  #17  
Old 05-03-2007, 06:55 PM
powerstroked162's Avatar
powerstroked162
powerstroked162 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ellensburg, Washington
Posts: 3,658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lol, Amen brother!

Cowboy Steve
 
  #18  
Old 05-03-2007, 07:20 PM
danhfordnut's Avatar
danhfordnut
danhfordnut is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Elizabeth City NC
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'll jump right on the CAT bandwagon. But about the 6.0, any problems are not International's fault. After all, from what I've been told the VT365 (6.0) is a pretty reliable engine that they rate at 230HP. Ford bought the engine and rates it at 325HP. I'll bet they'll run forever at 230HP.
 
  #19  
Old 05-03-2007, 07:22 PM
powerstroked162's Avatar
powerstroked162
powerstroked162 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ellensburg, Washington
Posts: 3,658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thats an interesting point. I wonder where ford came up with the extra 100 ponies

Cowboy Steve
 
  #20  
Old 05-03-2007, 09:38 PM
rimshoes's Avatar
rimshoes
rimshoes is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Enomra
Your statements about the problems from consumers adding 200 hp and trying to get warranty work is way off base. If the only problems Ford had with theses engines were related to aftermarket equipment then we wouldn't even be talking about issues with the 6.0. You cannot blame stuck unison rings(sticky turbo's), faulty EGR's, leaking and sticking Injectors, wire Chaffing and the constant reprogramming on the aftermarket world.

Sorry I'm not buying it.
Just using your thoughts. What you have to say a whole lot of people had to say. However, look at your post. The turbo, EGRs, injectors and Chaffing were all looked at and a redisign was done. There is a significant difference between the "2003" engines and the "2004" engines. The turbo has been a problem experienced by some. The basic engine design except perhaps that the head bolts which needed to be upgraded was a sound system. I have always felt that if the EPA had not commanded the american auto industries to come up with a better pollution design we would still have the 6.0 . IMO the 6.0 should have been given a better chance. The 2 cylinder deletion of this engine, the 4.5; is being used without problems in MANY vehicles around the world.

Now it seems a small diesel is being R&D tracked for the F150 and expedition.
I just wonder if it is a 4.5 in pollution mode.
 
  #21  
Old 05-03-2007, 09:50 PM
tn mac's Avatar
tn mac
tn mac is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LETS hope ford doesnt do there own engine remember what happened when chebby got the idea to do a engine we got the 6.5! Ford would be smart to focus on mpgs and dependability and the rest would take care of itself.
 
  #22  
Old 05-04-2007, 08:51 AM
Enomra's Avatar
Enomra
Enomra is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Oregon
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have had a 03 6.0 that had turbo issues and when they replaced it they went away so yes they are fixing them. My old 03 is now a very reliable truck and the new owner loves it. I now have a 06 6.0 and it has performed flawlessly. These people who post blanket statements about the 6.0 are very uninformed. The later years 05,06,07 are as good as they get.
 
  #23  
Old 05-04-2007, 10:57 AM
Bobmarlin's Avatar
Bobmarlin
Bobmarlin is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Pedro, CA
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Enomra
I have had a 03 6.0 that had turbo issues and when they replaced it they went away so yes they are fixing them. My old 03 is now a very reliable truck and the new owner loves it. I now have a 06 6.0 and it has performed flawlessly. These people who post blanket statements about the 6.0 are very uninformed. The later years 05,06,07 are as good as they get.
Exactly! I have an 06' and at 23K it has never had an issue even though I drive it like I stole it most of the time. It is bone stock because I personally see no reason nor have a need for it be any "faster" as it tows my fat toyhauler beautifully as is and that is why I bought it in the first place. I LOVE my stupid truck.....
 
  #24  
Old 05-04-2007, 04:30 PM
BucksTrucks's Avatar
BucksTrucks
BucksTrucks is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: USCGC Never Home
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tn mac
LETS hope ford doesnt do there own engine remember what happened when chebby got the idea to do a engine we got the 6.5! Ford would be smart to focus on mpgs and dependability and the rest would take care of itself.
It was the 5.7 diesel that GM decided to make its self. The 6.2 and 6.5 were made by detriot allison.
 
  #25  
Old 05-04-2007, 05:51 PM
cleatus12r's Avatar
cleatus12r
cleatus12r is offline
Butt-Head
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Reed Point, MT
Posts: 8,571
Received 2,032 Likes on 1,145 Posts
Originally Posted by danhfordnut
about the 6.0, any problems are not International's fault.........the VT365 (6.0) is a pretty reliable engine that they rate at 230HP. Ford bought the engine and rates it at 325HP. I'll bet they'll run forever at 230HP.
Exactly. Take an engine that International runs at 230 HP, is governed to 2800 RPM, and has very low fatality rate......then put the Ford programming "gurus" to work to mess with injection pulse width and timing, and spin it to 4200 RPM.......see how long it lasts.
 
  #26  
Old 05-04-2007, 06:01 PM
Percys Armory's Avatar
Percys Armory
Percys Armory is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
for many owners many miles
Originally Posted by cleatus12r
Exactly. Take an engine that International runs at 230 HP, is governed to 2800 RPM, and has very low fatality rate......then put the Ford programming "gurus" to work to mess with injection pulse width and timing, and spin it to 4200 RPM.......see how long it lasts.
 
  #27  
Old 05-04-2007, 09:47 PM
rollerstud98's Avatar
rollerstud98
rollerstud98 is offline
Postmaster

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Airdrie Alberta
Posts: 4,863
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
i've also never seen anything near 4200 rpm, sure thats where the redline is but i've never revved close to that
 
  #28  
Old 05-05-2007, 01:01 AM
GonzoCSU's Avatar
GonzoCSU
GonzoCSU is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Hampton, IA
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ford does own Range Rover now and Range Rover has been producing diesel engines for a long time. In one of the diesel magazines I have they showed a Range Rover small V8 diesel with twin variable geometry turbos and rumors that they may stick that engine in the F150. As much as I would hate to see it happen it is probably only a matter of time until Ford drops Navistar.
 

Last edited by GonzoCSU; 05-05-2007 at 01:02 AM. Reason: typo
  #29  
Old 05-05-2007, 01:17 AM
biz4two's Avatar
biz4two
biz4two is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 5,844
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Arrow

IMO...FORD should hook-up with Volvo. I know that the car division is different, but heck that should give FORD the "in" to the Volvo diesel truck engines.


biz
 
  #30  
Old 05-05-2007, 01:53 AM
chili7's Avatar
chili7
chili7 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PS162, 12 lines of mods and it's all the motors fault? LOL

Well, I won't bite.
 


Quick Reply: The "fun" continues



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:13 PM.