Notices
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Early Eighties Bullnose Ford Truck

302 or 300?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 24, 2007 | 12:18 PM
  #1  
Kylet8020's Avatar
Kylet8020
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
302 or 300?

ok so its goin to be a play toy work horse and a daily driver i want something with good low end and good gas mileage and great highway speeds while pullin a trailer could some one give me the pros and cons of both or a great build for them?
 
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2007 | 12:58 PM
  #2  
5.0Torx's Avatar
5.0Torx
Elder User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
i bet nearly everyone on here is going to recommend the 300 and bash the 302. however, i have a 300 in my truck and 5.0 HO in my car and i can say the 300 isnt half the motor that my HO is (both are stock). granted, you cant get an HO in a truck, but at least with a truck 302 you get the biggest aftermarket known to man, and more power at higher revs, which will help for highway. 300s are good with the low end torque thing, which is great for getting a really big, heavy thing moving. however, redline is 3000 or 3500 rpm, so they run out of breath quick, and NP435s (4 speed manual granny first) dont exactly put the engine in its powerband, so highway speed isnt great. even unloaded in mine (which has 3.55s) loses speed on hills. I cant imagine what its like trying to tow that big, heavy thing at 70 mph with a 300 and an NP. in the 80s, traffic probably went 50-60 mph, and that would probably be ok for the 300, but nowadays everyones going at least 65, if not 70+. the 300 simply doesnt have the revability that the 302 does. basically, with the 300 youre trading in the last 2000 rpm of power up top for slightly better torque for the first 500 rpm. dont let people tell you 302s are totally worthless down low. theyre fine, just not AS torquey from 1000-1500 maybe. better for getting your trailer moving at first, i'd say, but past 20 mph itd be all 302. especially if your 302 has a granny first behind it i would say it hardly matters at all that the 300 is better down low. but, thats just me and my opinion. i know the 300 guys are gonna rip me apart for this and tell me how stupid and ignorant i am, but fortunately, i dont care. I believe that for the average joe who is looking to tow a trailer and get good mpg (both will get 20+ at 70 mph if you gear them right and take care of them. my 300 has got me a best of 23. the 5.0 in my car - which i know is not a big truck - has gotten 27 mpg before) and maybe have some fun with hsi truck, the 302 is the better choice. For a farmer or construction worker or something, someone who rarely pulls big heavy things at more than 10 mph and does alot of WORK, the 300 is the better choice.

good luck
 
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2007 | 02:01 PM
  #3  
95Ford4x4's Avatar
95Ford4x4
Elder User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
From: Pensacola, FL
i've had big block v8's and the 300, the 300 is a torque monster, but doesn't rev high and the efi's are limited in how far you can juice it up. obviously the 302 has a very large aftermarket and you can do anything you want mild to wild. but if i was choosing between a 300 and v8 i would go with a 351 not the 302. i love the 300, and will love it even more when i tear it down for a rebuild and pep it up with what is available in the aftermarket. it sounds cooler to say you have a v8, and the gas mileage isn't much different with the 6, but i'm happy making switch from v8 to straight 6. the fact that the 300 doesn't rev very high adds to it's durability.
 
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2007 | 02:08 PM
  #4  
Franklin2's Avatar
Franklin2
Moderator
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 56,984
Likes: 2,738
From: Virginia
Club FTE Gold Member
You cannot compare a 302 in a truck to a 302 in a mustang. Drop the 302 HO into the truck, wiring and everything, and I bet the 300 would win the drag race if you were pulling a heavy load on a trailer.
 
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2007 | 04:43 PM
  #5  
5.0Torx's Avatar
5.0Torx
Elder User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
you do realize the HO revs twice as high, has almost twice the power, and more torque, right?
 
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2007 | 09:24 PM
  #6  
Franklin2's Avatar
Franklin2
Moderator
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 56,984
Likes: 2,738
From: Virginia
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by 5.0Torx
you do realize the HO revs twice as high, has almost twice the power, and more torque, right?
Yes, that's why I think the 300 would win. Sure, if you changed the gearing and possibly put a little bit of a stall convertor in the truck when you install the HO, it would probably win. But just putting the HO engine in and doing nothing else will not give you the results you would expect. And after doing all that, I do not think it would be as user friendly as a daily driver with those mods. It's all a compromise and you have to look at the entire package.
 
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2007 | 10:14 PM
  #7  
wizzard351's Avatar
wizzard351
Postmaster
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,166
Likes: 2
From: wi
ive had 300's in the past and there just plain tuff. throw on an offy intake with a good carb some headers and itll do pretty much what ya want.ive got a 302 now in my 1/2ton and its a freash reman rite from ford (only about 15000mi) what a sick usless pup.ive said it in the past the only truck that souldve come with a 302 shouldve ben a ranger other wise a 300 or 351 and bigger.hmm just imagine if they'd come out with a 351 6cyl
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2007 | 08:14 AM
  #8  
95Ford4x4's Avatar
95Ford4x4
Elder User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
From: Pensacola, FL
gm did come out with that monster 8.1 v8 instead of a v10. i wish ford would have stuck with the big straight 6. a v6 has no place in a truck, you've got no torque or horsepower. at least with the 300 you had torque. and with the aftermarket you can get horsepower too. a 351ci 6 would be cool, but i'd bet a serious gas hog. and i also agree with you wizzard that not putting the 302 in the ranger was a big mistake by ford. i'd bet the sales could have almost doubled with a v8 option.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 11:55 AM
  #9  
Kylet8020's Avatar
Kylet8020
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Thumbs up

alright i got it im puttin a 351w in it going to cost me about 1700 for it 3 year 150k mile + i gotta buy a intake, pipes and a carb but at least i can pick what i want... about 2200 for all but it will be a very nice motor and hope it will hold up to towing along with a 351 the truck is gettin a new c-6 tranny and thats about 1100 its self so a grand total of about 3300 and then alot of time under, on and around my truck so what u all think good set up or not?
 
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 12:09 PM
  #10  
95Ford4x4's Avatar
95Ford4x4
Elder User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
From: Pensacola, FL
what is the year of truck and what kind of tranny does it have right now?? the e4od would be a better tranny in that you would have overdrive when not pulling a trailer, and the e40d also has a lower first and second gear than the c6. but it's electronically controlled. the 351 is definately a better pick for towing than the 302. where are you buying the motor?? you could shop around some speed shops, they've got deals all the time on motors someone had built and couldn't afford the bill. i could of bought a mean 440 couple years ago guy had all kinds of work done and then couldn't afford to get it out of the shop. but i didn't have anything to put a dodge motor in.
 
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 12:38 PM
  #11  
Franklin2's Avatar
Franklin2
Moderator
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 56,984
Likes: 2,738
From: Virginia
Club FTE Gold Member
The 351w with a c6 is what I have in my truck, and it's an excellent all around package. The high tech e4od would have od, but I like the simplicity and proven track record of the c6. It's a very good tranny.
 
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 02:16 PM
  #12  
adrianspeeder's Avatar
adrianspeeder
Mountain Pass
20 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
From: Dover AFB / Harrisburg PA
300 fer grunt
302 fer speed
351w fer grunt and speed
460 just because

All are basically gonna get the same low mileage so the motto applys of "no replacement fer displacement".

Adrianspeeder
 
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 05:21 PM
  #13  
tgil's Avatar
tgil
Junior User
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
ive had both and i like both of them. either is a good choice, you cant go wrong.
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2007 | 07:57 PM
  #14  
Frdbuy8589's Avatar
Frdbuy8589
Senior User
20 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
From: CT
They're both good motors but if you want to do work on the get an 8 yes there are aftermarket parts for the 6 but for every part for the 6 theres 100 for the 302 and those parts are cheaper.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:57 PM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE