When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
There is a lot of misinformation floating about in this thread! Simply running E85 or even E100 in place of gasoline will not net any additional horsepower, and will probably actually cause power to go down if all that is done is fill the tank with the different fuel.
I assume this was directed at me.
"E85 has been repeatedly shown to produce more power than a comparable gasoline fuel, especially in engines that need high octane fuels to avoid early detonation.[3] Ford Motor Company found that power typically increased approximately 5% with the switch to E85 [4]. Researchers working on the equivalent of E85 fuel for general aviation aircraft AGE-85 have seen the same results with an aircraft engine jumping from 600 hp on conventional 100LL AV gas to 650 hp on the AGE-85. Recorded power increases range from 5% to 9% depending on the engine. [5][6]"
Look at the power output and racing section. I suppose it could be wrong. Wikepedia isn't flawless in it's info, but that is where I looked and I based what I said on it.
Sure, through tuning you can get more power, but that doesn't change that the mileage will go down--there's plenty of pages on the web about FFVs that show what they get mileage-wise on E85 vs. gasoline. Add to that the heavy subsidies that ethanol producers are currently getting, and E85 just plain works out to be a bad deal in this country right now. That may change if gasoline gets expensive enough, but the bottom line is that we would starve if we tried to run any significant number of our vehicles (in the U.S.) on ethanol. Right now, corn is the primary resource used to produce ethanol in the U.S., but there are better plants for that particular distillation--switchgrass and sugarcane to name a couple.
Ethanol does, however, add to the diversity of fuel sources, and that, in my book is a good thing. We just need to get past this "all our eggs in one basket" mentality when it comes to vehicle power sources.
Jason
P.S. When I said you can get more power by stuffing more fuel in an engine, I did mean fuel/air mixture--as in, going from a 2-barrel to a 4-barrel carb, turbo, supercharger, direct injection, whatever. Ethanol is not the be-all, end-all in fuels. Weren't we supposed to be driving solar-powered cars by now?
Sure, through tuning you can get more power, but that doesn't change that the mileage will go down--there's plenty of pages on the web about FFVs that show what they get mileage-wise on E85 vs. gasoline.
The article said only the fuel was changed (again, I don't know for a fact that what it says is true, I just assume it is because I have heard the same thing in more than just that article). Unless I don't understand what was said, no tuning was done to obtain the power increase.
"Ford Motor Company found that power typically increased approximately 5% with the switch to E85"
Impossible. If I were to fill my empty tank with E85 tomorrow, I guarantee that I will lose power and fuel mileage, and I will risk engine damage from running far too lean. Yes ethanol can make more power, no question, but not without tuning for it.
If everyone tried to run ethanol, the price of ethanol would shoot to the moon, but we wouldn't starve...I see your point, though. And I agree with you that ethanol is not some magic fix-all-our-problems solution to the oil dependency thing.
Yes ethanol can make more power, no question, but not without tuning for it.
I'll second that. When EFI started showing up on snowmobiles back in '98-2000, sleds delivered to regions that had ethenol additives in the fuel got different chips burned for the computer to richen the mixture. If you ran a non ethanol sled on even 10% ethanol mix you risked burning down the motor!! High performance 2 strokes are particularly sensitive to air/fuel ratio.
Now you folks have me thinking. I have the choice of Regular unleaded, Super unleaded, and Super Plus unleaded. I've been running Super in everything just because we drive a lot faster (except in the truck) here.
I'm going to run everything empty and fill up with regular unleaded for a try. Does it make a difference as far as octane requirements if the truck is US or Canadian (I'm thinking mine is Canadian because my speedo is KM and a couple of stickers. I can't find the octane stickers. Any idea what I should be running? Truck is a 90 F250 4x4 , 5.8 5sp.
Any idea what I should be running? Truck is a 90 F250 4x4 , 5.8 5sp. Thanks, Dave
Some individual motors are more prone to pinging under load due to various problems... carbon buildup in the combustion chambers, sharp edges or other defects in 1 or more combustion chambers, or a malfunctioning efi system. These motors will require higher octane. But in general a properly functioning and tuned Ford truck motor will work just fine on 87 octane.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.