When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have a 5.8L 351W out of a 1991 F250 4WD and I ran a compression and all the cylinders are 100lbs except two that are 92lbs that seems awful low to me. Am I wrong?
If you live in Denver, CO. a compression test would read lower than in say St. Louis, MO. Although I agree your readings seem low compared to my 1990 F250 4x4 w/5.8 litre w/250,000 miles.. The lowests cyl. was 160# the highest was 175#, this is well within the allowabe 20% difference between highest and lowest cyls., and I live in Wisconsin.
Although I was satisfied w/the results of the compression test and cylinder leakage test I pulled the motor to replace rear main seal, ring and replace bearings. (I have some blow-by). My desire is to swap in better breathing heads and install a new cam. Upon disassembly the cam is obviously worn and 2 lifters have knife sharp edges. The worn cam explains my loss of power.
Thanks everyone I appericate the fast response. I just picked up this truck, I had to rebuild the hubs and brakes already and I just felt the power was lacking. I also noticed the air filter box was full of oil, my 86 did this also it was caused by a bad ring on #8 but it was obvious as the cylinder was in the 70's and the others were up around 120. So when I ran a compression on this 5.8L and all the cylinders were around 100 or so, I just want a second opinon to my thinking. It only has a 115000 miles on the truck and I plan on this being my hunting truck which means it needs to be dependable in harsh country in the high country, my hunting camp is at 10600ft, as well as needing to tow my camper and gear over two passes and up and then up to my camp on snow,mud,rain or what ever comes along in the Colorado high country in the middle of October. I have pictures posted of this truck in my gallery.
Any suggestions for the cam and intake to maximize hp?
Maybe you need a cam and intake to maximize low rpm torque if you plan to tow in the high country. You'll also need to address the low compression, so a rebuild with 9:1 pistons should be in order.
I am in process of a full rebuild I will have the motor out by this weekend and am looking for a machine shop nearby for the heads and block. I agree that is exactly what I am looking for any suggestions as far as cams go?
Will I need to make any modifications to my computer with a different cam?
No. These are higher lift than the stock cam, but duration and overlap are appropriate to maintain a good vacuum signal, which keeps the computer happy. My cam is only a little bigger than the F4TE roller cam used in the 94+ 351 truck motors... which are speed density EFI as well. It was/is considered a nice upgrade for the early Lightning 351. All of these cams have less total duration(but more lift)than the stock 5.0HO cam, which is also a good all around cam if you had a roller motor. The 5.0HO was speed density in the early years BTW.
9:1 pistons and a Comp cams 35-255-5 is good with my 91 351 W EFI with no other modifications and will help with towing capabilities, correct? I am still trying to find a reasonable machine shop to take care of my block I wish I had a dip tank, lol. I am hoping the one I find can take care of my heads as well, with out costing me my first born.
I found a machine shop to dip my block but get this they won't do it if they don't remove and install the cam bearings, lol. I have always done my own cam bearing so I had to tell them to forget it. I found another place though has anyone heard of jet wash vise dip for a block?