When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Iam getting ready to put a 302 in my 50 F1 and I need some help. The truck has a MII. How do I go about leveling the engine fore and aft? Should I set the frame at ride height and then level the engine off of the carb pad on the intake? or do I set the frame level and then the engine level to that? I dont have an intake for the motor yet so can I level it off of the front and rear intake rail? Some intakes ive seen have the carb pad angled a little.
Or is it really not all that critical? I realize this must has some affect on pinion angle when I get that far.
You need the frame level and an intake on the motor. You can then level the carb pad. The engine will point down at the rear, toward the rear axle. Any other method is a crap shoot. You rally need an intake on it.
I would also have your steering and headers on the motor. That way, you can shift it, if necessary, to the passenger side so the headers clear the steering, if that is necessary. My 56 has an MII IFS and the engine is centered left-to-right, so yours might also wind up that way. There is plenty of room for the 302.
Randy, I agree in general with what you're saying, but it really isn't true that the frame "needs to be level" when this is done. It needs to be at the loaded ride condition (engine weight on the suspension). With an MII suspension conversion, God only knows what that will be.
You need the frame level and an intake on the motor. You can then level the carb pad. The engine will point down at the rear, toward the rear axle. Any other method is a crap shoot. You rally need an intake on it.
Good luck. And welcome to FTE!!!
Agree! The truck needs to be level and you need the intake on the engine. By the time you get all the parts back on the truck and decide on tires, etc., the engine will probably no long be totally level but it won't be off far enough to hurt anything....
So is it frame level or ride height? I guess thats what my problem was I asked a couple people and got a different answer from each. Im thinking ride height would be the best, but it must not be a big deal? I dont have a lot of parts I would need to be able to set the truck at the exact ride height but I could probably get it close.
Last edited by Fomocosho; Mar 10, 2007 at 07:51 AM.
Ride height would be perfect. Ride "rake" would be more specific. The problem comes in when you try to establish it with engine weight and you're also trying to mount the engine. I suppose you could put some temporary supports across the frame, lay the engine on, take measurements (ground to frame), then duplicate the rake at a better working height. However, as Vern said, it rarley makes much difference. The important thing is to use the intake carb plane to establish the angle of the motor to the frame.
I put a 5.0L EFI in my 50 F1; with MII front suspension. I have about 2-3" rake down in front. I set my frame at what I thought to be finished ride angle then set my engine at as close to level as possible. With EFI it is not as crucial as carburated. I also set the engine 1 1/2" offset to passenger side to clear manifolds and steering. I think I have about 4 degrees to front U-joint and matching at rear U-joint. I have run the engine no problem; but have not road tested drive train, hopefully this summer.
So is it frame level or ride height? I guess thats what my problem was I asked a couple people and got a different answer from each. Im thinking ride height would be the best, but it must not be a big deal? I dont have a lot of parts I would need to be able to set the truck at the exact ride height but I could probably get it close.
My truck was lower in front than the rear even without the engine weight so I put blocks of wood under the front tires to level the truck from front to rear and then located the engine mounts.
What is leveling the carb pad actually doing? Since most roads arent flat I was under the impression it would have a greater affect on driveline alignment rather than engine performance. Is this true?
Iam getting ready to put a 302 in my 50 F1 and I need some help. The truck has a MII. How do I go about leveling the engine fore and aft? Should I set the frame at ride height and then level the engine off of the carb pad on the intake? or do I set the frame level and then the engine level to that? I dont have an intake for the motor yet so can I level it off of the front and rear intake rail? Some intakes ive seen have the carb pad angled a little.
Or is it really not all that critical? I realize this must has some affect on pinion angle when I get that far.
Thanks
You're getting conflicting advice, you need to ask master hot rod builders and there are plenty of them at jalopy journal otherwise known as the H.A.M.B.
True and false. The engine and transmission are normally angled 2 degrees down for driveshaft alignement to the pinion which is 2 degrees up. The carb pad is then level so the carb bowls will theoretically have the same amount of fuel in them. You can verify your driveline angles with a inexpensive magnetic protractor before you hard mount the transmission crossmember. It may take a few washer to act as shims on the transmission mount bolts to get the correct angles. The first link shows what I am talking about but with more detail. The second one really gets into detail.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.