Brakes, Steering, Suspension, Tires, & Wheels  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Kumho

ceramic brake pads?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 07:35 PM
  #1  
mjlevi's Avatar
mjlevi
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: New York
ceramic brake pads?

Has anyone used ceramic brake pads on their Superduty? any pro's or con's to these type of pads for replacement?
 
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2006 | 11:58 AM
  #2  
pops_91710's Avatar
pops_91710
Laughing Gas
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,166
Likes: 0
From: Chino, California
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/3...rake-pads.html
 
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2006 | 05:18 PM
  #3  
MazdaRangerGuyInSTL's Avatar
MazdaRangerGuyInSTL
Elder User
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 871
Likes: 0
PROS - Last longer... work cooler... less dust... less warpage... better performance

CONS - More expensive... can sometimes take a little bit longer to "seat"... in other words it may take 50-100 miles of driving to get "full" braking power out of them.

Really good stuff, those ceramic brake pads are!

Good luck
 
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2006 | 08:54 AM
  #4  
pops_91710's Avatar
pops_91710
Laughing Gas
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,166
Likes: 0
From: Chino, California
The 'con' about wearing out the rotors sooner is really offset considerably when you consider the longevity of the brake pad's lifetime. Several sets of organic or other softer materials cost as much as or more (labor is the same on all types) than rotors. So, my preference goes to the ceramics. Fewer change-outs, less dust build up, safer stopping, etc.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 10:08 AM
  #5  
50calmike's Avatar
50calmike
Elder User
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
From: Eastern Ohio
Had them on my 99 250 and the stopping power was greatly increased. I would recommend them.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 11:54 AM
  #6  
aurgathor's Avatar
aurgathor
Cargo Master
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,899
Likes: 2
From: Lynnwood, WA
Originally Posted by pops_91710
The 'con' about wearing out the rotors sooner is really offset considerably when you consider the longevity of the brake pad's lifetime. Several sets of organic or other softer materials cost as much as or more (labor is the same on all types) than rotors. So, my preference goes to the ceramics. Fewer change-outs, less dust build up, safer stopping, etc.
I do my own brakes (and pads are very easy to change) and found that it's better to use softer pads so I don't need to worry about rotors -- more expensive and lot more work. But this is all IMHO.
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2006 | 07:23 AM
  #7  
pops_91710's Avatar
pops_91710
Laughing Gas
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,166
Likes: 0
From: Chino, California
Originally Posted by aurgathor
I do my own brakes (and pads are very easy to change) and found that it's better to use softer pads so I don't need to worry about rotors -- more expensive and lot more work. But this is all IMHO.
My point was this: Eventually all rotors wear out regardless of the composition of the pads used. So, you will be doing it no matter what. But "more expensive" is a fallacy because you have already spent as much (or more) on pads as would have on rotors. Ergo my comment that you are not really saving any money.
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2006 | 08:41 AM
  #8  
merlynr's Avatar
merlynr
Posting Guru
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by pops_91710
My point was this: Eventually all rotors wear out regardless of the composition of the pads used. So, you will be doing it no matter what. But "more expensive" is a fallacy because you have already spent as much (or more) on pads as would have on rotors. Ergo my comment that you are not really saving any money.
I usually buy "lifetime guaranteed" pads and so most of the time they are free as long as you own the vehicle. I agree with pops_91710 because pads are getting easier to change as the technology improves. I have wanted to try the ceramic pads, but afraid they will wear out my rotors.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Dec 22, 2006 | 12:26 PM
  #9  
pronstar's Avatar
pronstar
Elder User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by MazdaRangerGuyInSTL
PROS ... better performance
I will agree with you that they can offer better performance than stock.

But I haven't seen any data showing superiority versus a non-ceramic performance pad.

This police-intereceptor test didn't show a performance advantage at all for the ceramic pads tested:
http://www.nlectc.org/pdffiles/Evalu...kePads2000.pdf

 

Last edited by pronstar; Dec 22, 2006 at 12:30 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2006 | 01:20 PM
  #10  
aurgathor's Avatar
aurgathor
Cargo Master
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,899
Likes: 2
From: Lynnwood, WA
Originally Posted by pops_91710
My point was this: Eventually all rotors wear out regardless of the composition of the pads used. So, you will be doing it no matter what. But "more expensive" is a fallacy because you have already spent as much (or more) on pads as would have on rotors. Ergo my comment that you are not really saving any money.
Well, my Bronco has 195k on it, and I believe it is still on its original rotors. Got it at 120k, so I can't be 100% sure, but it was a govt vehicle, and they sell them before major repairs from wearout kick in. Aside from turning them at 125k, 2 brake pads, and some brake fluids, nothing else were done or used since I got it. Last I checked the rotors were still in excellent shape. Not sure how long a rotor last with ceramic pads, but I consider mine pretty good, and I used only OEM or equivalent pads.
 

Last edited by aurgathor; Dec 22, 2006 at 01:27 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2006 | 10:39 PM
  #11  
pops_91710's Avatar
pops_91710
Laughing Gas
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,166
Likes: 0
From: Chino, California
Originally Posted by aurgathor
Well, my Bronco has 195k on it, and I believe it is still on its original rotors. Got it at 120k, so I can't be 100% sure, but it was a govt vehicle, and they sell them before major repairs from wearout kick in. Aside from turning them at 125k, 2 brake pads, and some brake fluids, nothing else were done or used since I got it. Last I checked the rotors were still in excellent shape. Not sure how long a rotor last with ceramic pads, but I consider mine pretty good, and I used only OEM or equivalent pads.
Everything is relative to how a vehicle is driven and environmental conditions. I don't see how what you have said has anything to do with my comment. You have to compare it to the same vehicle used under exactly the same conditions. Nothing said here invalidates my statements.
 
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2007 | 07:02 AM
  #12  
Gevans17's Avatar
Gevans17
Posting Guru
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
Ceramic Pads

Less brake dust as well, I believe
 
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2007 | 09:52 AM
  #13  
Mr Incredible's Avatar
Mr Incredible
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
I put ceramic pads on my 98 Z28. The increased braking power was very evident and the brake dust is reduced by at least 80%.

How they would do for my truck, I don't know. But I can't imagine they would be a bad choice.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rshep
1999 - 2016 Super Duty
4
Apr 13, 2016 11:32 PM
F 250 6 liter
1999 - 2016 Super Duty
20
Oct 18, 2014 10:03 AM
mcassel1
2004 - 2008 F150
9
Aug 23, 2010 02:25 PM
babock
2004 - 2008 F150
19
Sep 19, 2006 04:25 PM
mdpnh
Brakes, Steering, Suspension, Tires, & Wheels
6
Jul 13, 2005 12:06 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:30 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE