Notices

frankenstein 302

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 4, 2006 | 02:47 PM
  #1  
buckethead5k's Avatar
buckethead5k
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Question frankenstein 302

I have a 302 with 351w heads and a 351w firing order in my 72 f100, Obviously this is a mod, anyone ever heard of it and what is the purpose, i dont even know what any of the tune up specs for this would be!
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2006 | 07:04 PM
  #2  
jwtimme's Avatar
jwtimme
Laughing Gas
20 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 3
From: tulsa
it not a bad thing, whoever built the motor used a 351 cam which has a diffrent firing order than a 302.
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2006 | 08:07 PM
  #3  
FordBoypete's Avatar
FordBoypete
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 1
From: East Central Florida
What are the casting numbers on your Intake manifold? you may have a 351 instead of a 302, they were both common & available after 68 in the F-series.

FBp
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2006 | 08:50 PM
  #4  
buckethead5k's Avatar
buckethead5k
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
cast # is D30E-9425-AA but also stamped on the intake is the firing order of the 302 (15426378) Can this be built up for some nice horse power?
 

Last edited by buckethead5k; Dec 4, 2006 at 08:52 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2006 | 09:45 PM
  #5  
85e150's Avatar
85e150
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,481
Likes: 2,801
Club FTE Gold Member
I saw such a beast in a RV once. Not sure about the heads, but it had the 351 firing order. Might have been a factory combo for HD use????
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2006 | 09:56 PM
  #6  
Plums72's Avatar
Plums72
Elder User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
From: South Carolina
Thumbs up

hey im new here but i have a 72 myself with a 351W me and my dad are restoring it but from what my dad says they can be built into beasts
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2006 | 10:33 PM
  #7  
arctic y block's Avatar
arctic y block
Post Fiend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,325
Likes: 14
From: Island Southeast Alaska
Next to the Y Block the 351W is the best of ford IMO. But than tere is my 390 biult to 427. FE's are awosome.
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2006 | 08:09 AM
  #8  
P51D Mustang's Avatar
P51D Mustang
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
For some reason the 351W/5.0L HO firing order reduces stress on the forward main bearing, compared to the 289/302 firing order. In the 60's they sometimes limited ignition advance on 289's, but that's less needed with the 351w firing order.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Dec 5, 2006 | 08:44 AM
  #9  
buckethead5k's Avatar
buckethead5k
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
So the general consensus is to keep this motor over other swap options?
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2006 | 09:38 AM
  #10  
P51D Mustang's Avatar
P51D Mustang
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
In my opinion, there's nothing wrong with using the 302 as the foundation for an F100 powerplant. It's a great engine. Depending on how wild you build it, you could have anywhere from 200 to 400 naturally asperated HP from that 302 shortblock. Tourqe could vary from around 300 to about 385 ft-lb's.

A 370-400 Hp 302 will require aftermarket AFR or TFS heads, and an Edelbrock RPM, or Wieand Stealth, type 4bl intake, but so would a 370-400 horse 351w also require these type of aftermarket parts.

The cylinder heads are the main limiting factor, and they are the same for both motors.

A 351w, or another larger displacement alternative's main advantage over a 302, would be the little extra low end grunt coming right off idle, due to the extra cubes.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2006 | 11:59 PM
  #11  
GypsyR's Avatar
GypsyR
More Turbo
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 566
Likes: 5
From: SC
351W heads on a 302/289 are an old school swap. There didn't used to be much in the way of affordable Trick Flow and AFR heads. The 69-74 351W heads had the largest valves installed in small block Fords. As a plus the 69-70's weren't drilled out for EGR passages though the famous casting "bump" in the exhaust port was there. Today the cost of doing a really good port/polish and rebuild of the old 351W heads is almost that of a a decent pair of aluminum aftermarket heads. Any of which will pretty much outperform the modified W heads right out of the box anyway. Not outform by a big bunch, but still...
Outdated hotrod tech today but still valid. Back in the day folks also used to swap 302 cams into 351W's because there were a much wider variety of cam grinds for 289's and 302's.
I have a pair of home-ported '69 heads on my truck's rather newer 351W engine. I like em just fine and don't see where I need anything more. Besides, I got them free.
 
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2006 | 03:13 AM
  #12  
darrin1999's Avatar
darrin1999
Posting Guru
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 2
From: fargo, nd
for a relatively light f100 2 wd id say the 302 youve got is fine, if it were a bigger truck or a 4x4 then id say go a bigger engine like a 390 or 460... your 302 should be able to get close to 20 mpg if youre light on the gas and have highway gears, if you went to a 390 itd get about 15, on a 460 you could get about 12, but a bigger engine is a whole lot more power... so it depends on your intended use- if youre just running around town with it doing errands and such id stick with the 302... if youre towing much of anything with it get a 390 or 460
 
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2006 | 09:17 AM
  #13  
P51D Mustang's Avatar
P51D Mustang
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
In stock form the old 351w 4bl heads don't flow quite as good as stock GT40 Cobra heads. With a professional port job, they can be made to flow about as good as out of the box GT40Y aluminum heads, or Edelbrock Performer heads, or Holly Systemax heads..ect.. That's still significantly less than the out of box TFS or AFR heads. Nonetheless, massaged 69 351w 4bl heads could potentially support up to 450 HP. As rule of thumb, you will normally get about 80% of the heads potential from a steetable package, so a streetable 360 HP 302, using ported 351w 4bl heads, is entirely feasable.

We have numerous dyno results of stock shortblock 380-400 HP 302's (some even using the Stock HO cam), with the TFS and/or AFR heads, but using the 351w heads (provided they are the old 69 4 bl castings, not later 351w heads, and they are pro ported), could come fairly close.

Don't sell the 302 short. What's possible today with a SBF, compared to times past, is absolutely revolutionary. There's not that many streetable 400 HP BB's out there. A emissions legal 302 capable of cranking out about 1.3 Hp per cubic inch, sipping pump gas, is not all that uncommon these days.

Of course a big block has more potential. A 460 cylinder head flows about the same as out of the box TFS or AFR small block heads, but ported they could probably support up to 680 HP. Stock 390 FE heads with a 2.04" intake valve, also flow at about the same level of unported TFS or AFR small block heads.
 

Last edited by P51D Mustang; Dec 7, 2006 at 09:20 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
macs40
Ford Truck Parts for Sale
0
Dec 25, 2016 05:07 PM
rooster41
New Member Introductions
2
Aug 26, 2009 03:01 PM
rmiller01
1968-Present E-Series Van/Cutaway/Chassis
3
Dec 11, 2008 12:36 PM
Nightrain
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
2
Aug 19, 2007 11:37 AM
rsalter66
335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland
2
May 29, 2007 11:57 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:38 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE