emissions removal
#31
#34
But the question still remains... Is a 85 351W HO retarded, per emissions? I'd hate to do a timing set, just to see no difference...other than a more stable ignition sequence.
What says youze guyz??
#36
That would make it easy enough to deal with then. I'm needing to do a new timing set soon, so a "straight up" set is the ticket.
But the question still remains... Is a 85 351W HO retarded, per emissions? I'd hate to do a timing set, just to see no difference...other than a more stable ignition sequence.
What says youze guyz??
But the question still remains... Is a 85 351W HO retarded, per emissions? I'd hate to do a timing set, just to see no difference...other than a more stable ignition sequence.
What says youze guyz??
I am only the second owner and I bought the truck from a guy I worked with.
He had it timed and tuned at the Ford Dealership one week before I got it.
He said he had never been happy with the performance. After driving it for a week, I set the time up,not with light but by ear. Enough to make it come alive but not ping or kick-back against starter.
Has been that way since 96. No problems and I am REALLY pleased with the performance... Just throwing that out there...Good Luck........Trav.
#37
I don't know the technical aspects but practical experience with my 85 351W HO.
I am only the second owner and I bought the truck from a guy I worked with.
He had it timed and tuned at the Ford Dealership one week before I got it.
He said he had never been happy with the performance. After driving it for a week, I set the time up,not with light but by ear. Enough to make it come alive but not ping or kick-back against starter.
Has been that way since 96. No problems and I am REALLY pleased with the performance... Just throwing that out there...Good Luck........Trav.
I am only the second owner and I bought the truck from a guy I worked with.
He had it timed and tuned at the Ford Dealership one week before I got it.
He said he had never been happy with the performance. After driving it for a week, I set the time up,not with light but by ear. Enough to make it come alive but not ping or kick-back against starter.
Has been that way since 96. No problems and I am REALLY pleased with the performance... Just throwing that out there...Good Luck........Trav.
#38
Thanks for the answers / info.
I took the truck to a shop that does work on old vehicles and found out a few things.
As you said, the emissions sticker says "non-catalyist" so there wasn't a cat on the truck.
What I did find out today is that when the PO changed the carb to an aftermarket Edelbrock it does not have the ports to hook up all of the factory emissions.....and several things were left unhooked.
The mechanic that looked at it disconnected the EGR and a couple other things that were not able to work properly due to the carb change. Everything is marked and re-connectable in the future. It does run a little better, but I would agree that the gains are a result of the system not working as designed due to the carb change and the tampering with the system.
I'm going to have to inventory the system and see what is there and what isn't and go from there. Digging down into it there were several vacum lines missing that I didn't realize from my first look.
I guess one of the first things to find out is what originally hooked to the carb and if there is some way that it can be reconnected to the carb that is on it or if I have to go back to a stock carb to restore all of the system to orignal working order. Then determine if I want to rebuild the emissions or repair what I have to the best working order that I can.
Looks like I am going to have to learn some emissions stuff. Its obvious that the PO didn't know squat.
I took the truck to a shop that does work on old vehicles and found out a few things.
As you said, the emissions sticker says "non-catalyist" so there wasn't a cat on the truck.
What I did find out today is that when the PO changed the carb to an aftermarket Edelbrock it does not have the ports to hook up all of the factory emissions.....and several things were left unhooked.
The mechanic that looked at it disconnected the EGR and a couple other things that were not able to work properly due to the carb change. Everything is marked and re-connectable in the future. It does run a little better, but I would agree that the gains are a result of the system not working as designed due to the carb change and the tampering with the system.
I'm going to have to inventory the system and see what is there and what isn't and go from there. Digging down into it there were several vacum lines missing that I didn't realize from my first look.
I guess one of the first things to find out is what originally hooked to the carb and if there is some way that it can be reconnected to the carb that is on it or if I have to go back to a stock carb to restore all of the system to orignal working order. Then determine if I want to rebuild the emissions or repair what I have to the best working order that I can.
Looks like I am going to have to learn some emissions stuff. Its obvious that the PO didn't know squat.
#39
That label under your hood is key... what you will learn about those devices is that some of them were for emissions controls, and others were for drivability and operational purposes. It really amazes me what Detroit was able to come up with using only heat and vacuum.
These may help you:
Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums - View Single Post - Vacuum Diagram Acronyms
Dictionary of Automotive Terms A-Z
#40
Thanks Ctubutis.
The diagram under the hood is is good shape and the link to the acronyms will help as well.
I'll start going through it and see where I get.
It looks like if I get stuck there is plenty of help available.
If there is such a thing, a PDF of the emissions & vacum routing would be awesome.
The diagram under the hood is is good shape and the link to the acronyms will help as well.
I'll start going through it and see where I get.
It looks like if I get stuck there is plenty of help available.
If there is such a thing, a PDF of the emissions & vacum routing would be awesome.
#41
Thanks Ctubutis.
The diagram under the hood is is good shape and the link to the acronyms will help as well.
I'll start going through it and see where I get.
It looks like if I get stuck there is plenty of help available.
If there is such a thing, a PDF of the emissions & vacum routing would be awesome.
The diagram under the hood is is good shape and the link to the acronyms will help as well.
I'll start going through it and see where I get.
It looks like if I get stuck there is plenty of help available.
If there is such a thing, a PDF of the emissions & vacum routing would be awesome.
#42
You can probably make it run ok with that carb if you treat the whole thing as a early non-emissions type engine, since you have a non-emissions carb. That's probably why the mechanic disconnected some things. You will have to decide to run this engine like a late 60's early 70's model, or get the original carb and hook everything back like it's supposed to be.
That is probably where I am going to start. But I've added a stock carb to my junkyard list just incase I run across a good one.
I have to strip it down to get to some other things like replacing the thermostat and heater hoses all of which are buried....
While I am stripping it down I'm gonna identify, mark and photo everything, then store it. I'd hate to have to buy it all if Big Brother got involved
#44
removing emissions when everything is working good is a terrible terrible idea
Removing working emissions systems will cause loss of power, loss of fuel economy, and reliability issues. Also removing emissions is illegal and can cause the law to prohibit the vehicle to be resold ever again.
Removing working emissions systems will cause loss of power, loss of fuel economy, and reliability issues. Also removing emissions is illegal and can cause the law to prohibit the vehicle to be resold ever again.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Carmax
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
09-27-2015 06:55 PM
JeffBrothersfirst
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
08-09-2004 08:24 PM