Notices

aerodynamics (long)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 9, 2006 | 03:22 PM
  #1  
muscletruck7379's Avatar
muscletruck7379
Thread Starter
|
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,703
Likes: 4
From: Harrisburg, NE
Club FTE Silver Member

aerodynamics (long)

"For a full-size truck, a change in drag coefficient of 0.01 is approximately equal to an improvement in fuel economy of 0.1 mpg on the combined city/highway driving cycle," says GM's Schenkel. "The same drag coefficient reduction can improve a car's fuel economy by approximately 0.2 mpg."

Volvo's Frasher says the force acting against a car by the air it moves is a function of:



Cd x Frontal Area x Density of Air x Speed Squared

Speed clearly is an important part of the equation. At stop-and-go speeds, drag isn't a big deal, but the faster you go, the more it matters. At 70 mph, you've got four times the force working against your vehicle that you have at 35 mph.

To put Cd changes in perspective, Frasher put some numbers to a hypothetical sedan. Our imaginary car has a curb weight of 3,527 pounds, a Cd of 0.30, a frontal area of 23.7 square feet and 9 pounds of rolling resistance for every 1,000 pounds of weight.

According to Frasher, "If we put a gas-burning engine in this car, expect reasonable performance and drive it on a combined driving cycle, we can expect to get 23.8 mpg…. Add 10 percent to the drag coefficient, we'll now get 23.3 mpg…. Take 10 percent from the drag coefficient, we'll now get 24.3 mpg."

It turns out the biggest gains are to be found on pickups — not by dropping the tailgate (a common misconception), but by installing a tonneau cover. "A tonneau cover improves the aerodynamics dramatically — on all pickup trucks," according to Ford's Wegryn. "In general, a tonneau cover can provide a drag reduction of 2 to 7 percent, depending on cab style, box length and overall vehicle Cd. Average fuel economy improvement ranges from 0.1 to 0.3 mpg." From an aero standpoint, it doesn't make a difference if you choose a soft or hard cover.

-http://www.edmunds.com/advice/specialreports/articles/106954/article.html

thoughts? I think its more concrete than most claims myself.
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2006 | 04:21 PM
  #2  
Torque1st's Avatar
Torque1st
Posting Legend
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 30,255
Likes: 37
Sound like info from people that know...
 
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2006 | 12:08 PM
  #3  
muscletruck7379's Avatar
muscletruck7379
Thread Starter
|
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,703
Likes: 4
From: Harrisburg, NE
Club FTE Silver Member

i found this after reading about a superduty in the newest issue of diesel power magazine that gets 26mpg, the biggest mods he did was lower the truck and build a fastback-like tonneau cover.
 
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2006 | 02:31 PM
  #4  
aurgathor's Avatar
aurgathor
Cargo Master
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,899
Likes: 2
From: Lynnwood, WA
Originally Posted by muscletruck7379
Cd x Frontal Area x Density of Air x Speed Squared
I don't remember exactly the grade, but I learned this early in high school, maybe in junior high. This is why driving slower is one very good way to decrerase wind drag, hence increase mpg.

The teardrop shape has the smallest coefficients, so cars with shapes similar to it will have less wind drag. With trucks, especially 18 wheelers, there's no way to reduce the frontal area, but fairings can be used to smoothen the shape, and a fastback like tonneau cover does the same thing for a pickup.
 
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2006 | 03:16 AM
  #5  
tdister's Avatar
tdister
Posting Guru
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
From: central TX
But MythBusters PROVED...

 
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2006 | 07:09 AM
  #6  
PSKSAM2's Avatar
PSKSAM2
Laughing Gas
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 943
Likes: 2
From: Randolph, NJ
Originally Posted by aurgathor
I don't remember exactly the grade, but I learned this early in high school, maybe in junior high. This is why driving slower is one very good way to decrerase wind drag, hence increase mpg.
Only to a point. At slower speeds (5~25), wind drag isn't as much of a factor, and you aren't making enough miles per unit time to make up the gasoline overhead of running the engine (unless you have a hybrid and the engine is off).

gas mile@ge vs speed



-Jim
 

Last edited by PSKSAM2; Nov 13, 2006 at 07:16 AM. Reason: I hate the FTE automatic word linker...
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2006 | 12:13 PM
  #7  
jimandmandy's Avatar
jimandmandy
Post Fiend
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,228
Likes: 5
From: Running Springs CA
That chart assumes modern automotive gear ratios, engine torque curves, etc. Back in the heyday of the Mobil Economy Run (1950's and 1960's), 35mph proved optimum, but those were inline sixes with one barrel carbs, torque peaks below 2000rpm, and three speed manual transmissions.

Jim
 
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 12:13 PM
  #8  
muscletruck7379's Avatar
muscletruck7379
Thread Starter
|
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,703
Likes: 4
From: Harrisburg, NE
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by aurgathor
The teardrop shape has the smallest coefficients, so cars with shapes similar to it will have less wind drag. With trucks, especially 18 wheelers, there's no way to reduce the frontal area, but fairings can be used to smoothen the shape, and a fastback like tonneau cover does the same thing for a pickup.
I think that its the honda insight (hybrid) that is teardrop shaped, but trucks would look really weird shaped like that. also somewhere online i saw some factory testing info on truckers drafting each other and how much that helps, too bad its illegal though, although air diverters and flaps on the back of trailers and some funky looking side skirts helped too.

jimandandy, according to those economy runs my falcon gets over 30mpg! although i dont think thats too far from true with a little work. i need to get it on the road and find out...
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-2

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-3

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-4

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-9

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
Old Nov 16, 2006 | 11:19 AM
  #9  
aurgathor's Avatar
aurgathor
Cargo Master
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,899
Likes: 2
From: Lynnwood, WA
[QUOTE=PSKSAM2]Only to a point. At slower speeds (5~25), wind drag isn't as much of a factor, and you aren't making enough miles per unit time to make up the gasoline overhead of running the engine (unless you have a hybrid and the engine is off).
[/QOUTE]
I forgot to mention that one need to be in the last gear -- 3rd, 4th, 5th, etc., to keep the engine rpm low. And as it was mentioned, the optimum speed may vary significantly, and that mostly depends on gearing, engine, and the shape and frontal area of the vehicle.
 
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2006 | 11:32 AM
  #10  
muscletruck7379's Avatar
muscletruck7379
Thread Starter
|
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,703
Likes: 4
From: Harrisburg, NE
Club FTE Silver Member

check out the thread on the 26mpg super duty in the diesel threads
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ColoradoF350
1999 - 2016 Super Duty
9
Sep 13, 2014 10:45 AM
Rosson03
Excursion - King of SUVs
37
Feb 18, 2012 07:41 AM
lasitter
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
May 24, 2010 09:59 PM
Mmaxed
Modular V10 (6.8l)
5
Oct 11, 2009 09:14 PM
BigF350
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
22
Oct 14, 2005 01:13 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:38 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-1
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-3
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-6
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-9
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE