Notices
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

brake proportioning valve question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 07:49 AM
  #31  
GreatNorthWoods's Avatar
GreatNorthWoods
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 8,813
Likes: 13
From: Littleton, New Hampshire
Bobby/Alan,

The rear wheel cylinders are the same ones off the 87 Chrysler so the wheel cylinder daimeter is moot. I used the complete Chrysler rear end with the brakes that were on it. All I did was dissemble them, clean throughly with alcohol, and reassemble. A brake job had just been done on the donor car so all the parts were new. Both rear wheel cylinders have clean fluid coming out when bled so there's no rust in them. I used a new rear brake hose as well as all new brake lines. There are no kinks or even sharp bends going to the rear. I replaced the MC with a rebuilt just to be sure it there was not a massive internal leak in the MC but no change. I'll have to think about rigging a pressure gauge but I'm not sure that would really tell me much. I have no idea how much line pressure is necessary to engage the rear brakes or make them engage before the front...or would I just be looking for any pressure at all? If that's the case I know I have some pressure because if I jack it up and push the brake pedal down I can't turn the rear wheels.
 
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 10:45 AM
  #32  
alanco's Avatar
alanco
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 412
Likes: 1
From: Fallon, Nevada
More Brakes

Originally Posted by GreatNorthWoods
Bobby/Alan,

The rear wheel cylinders are the same ones off the 87 Chrysler so the wheel cylinder daimeter is moot. I used the complete Chrysler rear end with the brakes that were on it. All I did was dissemble them, clean throughly with alcohol, and reassemble. A brake job had just been done on the donor car so all the parts were new. Both rear wheel cylinders have clean fluid coming out when bled so there's no rust in them. I used a new rear brake hose as well as all new brake lines. There are no kinks or even sharp bends going to the rear. I replaced the MC with a rebuilt just to be sure it there was not a massive internal leak in the MC but no change. I'll have to think about rigging a pressure gauge but I'm not sure that would really tell me much. I have no idea how much line pressure is necessary to engage the rear brakes or make them engage before the front...or would I just be looking for any pressure at all? If that's the case I know I have some
pressure because if I jack it up and push the brake pedal down I can't turn the rear wheels.
Jeez, just after I looked up F3 brakes in the manual and found that they were not self energizing......

I think that the metering valve is the culprit: either that or the M/C has to be at fault as that is where the pressure comes from.....

One thing that CIAF neglected to mention was that all the early disk/drum setups did not even use a metering valve. You won't find any on Ford cars or Ford trucks to 1981. I was sure of this statement, but I looked up the facts in the service manuals.

The proportioning valve could also be at fault. After all, the basic line pressure to the rear is from the rear piston on the M/C and if the M/C went directly to the rear brakes, it should activate them very quickly because it is just the ratio of the two cylinders and the force on the pedal plus the booster pressure.

Regards,

Alanco
 
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 01:25 PM
  #33  
GreatNorthWoods's Avatar
GreatNorthWoods
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 8,813
Likes: 13
From: Littleton, New Hampshire
I tend to agree even though tests have indicated that the valve is good. I probably have another combination valve laying around in the garage somewhere I can try. Since the metering and proportioning is done by the combination valve if I eliminate it and run the lines directly from the MC what affect would that have on my brakes?

Vern
 
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 01:43 PM
  #34  
alanco's Avatar
alanco
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 412
Likes: 1
From: Fallon, Nevada
Brakes

Originally Posted by GreatNorthWoods
I tend to agree even though tests have indicated that the valve is good. I probably have another combination valve laying around in the garage somewhere I can try. Since the metering and proportioning is done by the combination valve if I eliminate it and run the lines directly from the MC what affect would that have on my brakes?

Vern
The rear brakes would be likely to actuate harder than the front.

Alanco
 
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 01:49 PM
  #35  
GreatNorthWoods's Avatar
GreatNorthWoods
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 8,813
Likes: 13
From: Littleton, New Hampshire
That doesn't sound all bad. It sure beats what I have now all to heck. I may just give it try...thanks!
 
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 09:05 PM
  #36  
bobbytnm's Avatar
bobbytnm
Roast em' if you got 'em
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,997
Likes: 9,886
From: Rio Rancho, NM
Club FTE Gold Member
Vern,

I had forgotten that you used the entire rear suspension from the Chrysler (I sure thought I might have been onto something that time)
Getting rid of the proportioning valve would be a good test. It would be best to have one in the long run though. From what I have read they are designed to compensate for the weight transfer from rear to front during braking.

The only other thought I have on the whole system would be the brake pedal itself, specifically the ratio of the lever. I can't remember, did you use the brake pedal assy from the donor car or did you build your own?

Bobby
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 06:14 AM
  #37  
GreatNorthWoods's Avatar
GreatNorthWoods
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 8,813
Likes: 13
From: Littleton, New Hampshire
Bobby,

I used the Chrysler brake pedal too. I wanted to use all the Chrysler stuff just like it came from the car so I would not have this very problem that I'm having...so much for planning!
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 08:24 AM
  #38  
bobbytnm's Avatar
bobbytnm
Roast em' if you got 'em
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,997
Likes: 9,886
From: Rio Rancho, NM
Club FTE Gold Member
Vern,

LOL....
You don't suppose some nasty little creature (I'm not mentioning any species here, especially mice or anything like that) might have gotten inside the brake system while you had it all apart and built a nest in there do you?

Bobby
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-7

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 10:30 AM
  #39  
alanco's Avatar
alanco
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 412
Likes: 1
From: Fallon, Nevada
Blame Chrysler...............

Originally Posted by GreatNorthWoods
Bobby,

I used the Chrysler brake pedal too. I wanted to use all the Chrysler stuff just like it came from the car so I would not have this very problem that I'm having...so much for planning!
I have to work on Dodge Trucks and Chrysler Products, although I prefer not to, and their quality is so low and their computer systems are as bad as Fords, so I figure your brakes work as well as they did in the donor truck or car. (must be a truck as they did not have rwd cars in 87.) So don't blame yourself. Their rear ends are pretty good other than the fact that they use unlapped gearsets on new vehicles.

So don't blame yourself, blame Chrysler..........................

Alanco
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 10:42 AM
  #40  
bobbytnm's Avatar
bobbytnm
Roast em' if you got 'em
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,997
Likes: 9,886
From: Rio Rancho, NM
Club FTE Gold Member
They made rwd cars up through 89 or 90

Bobby
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 11:15 AM
  #41  
OldgreenF1's Avatar
OldgreenF1
Elder User
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 630
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, OH
I havent read this whole string but one thing an old builder showed me first hand while doing brakes is to take a drill bit inside every cut line where he has a joint and opens the line up if its restricted from burs or tube cutters. We were building a 40 Convertible and he showed me this trick. I was holding a brake line and said it looks fine he stopped me. He had the drill bit already laid out from working on it the previouse day. He runs it inside the cut tube just to make sure its open to spec.
He then told me how hes tacked down brake problems to restricted lines on other customer scars.
Thats a good tip to remember when your scratching your head.
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 12:07 PM
  #42  
alanco's Avatar
alanco
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 412
Likes: 1
From: Fallon, Nevada
Brake lines.....

Originally Posted by OldgreenF1
I havent read this whole string but one thing an old builder showed me first hand while doing brakes is to take a drill bit inside every cut line where he has a joint and opens the line up if its restricted from burs or tube cutters. We were building a 40 Convertible and he showed me this trick. I was holding a brake line and said it looks fine he stopped me. He had the drill bit already laid out from working on it the previouse day. He runs it inside the cut tube just to make sure its open to spec.
He then told me how hes tacked down brake problems to restricted lines on other customer scars.
Thats a good tip to remember when your scratching your head.
If you are using a flaring tool, it has a tapered reamer blade on it to ream the cut end. Secondly, with brakes, and their high pressures, use of a double flaring tool is mandantory. When you use a double flaring tool, you must ream the tubing to start the flaring process with the flare tooling which fits into the tubing innter diameter. This tool bows out the tubing, and leaves a flat area which is flared directly with the tool when the tooling is removed. While a single flare with steel tubing will work on the lower pressures with drum brakes, particularly Bendix self energizing brakes, it will not be reliable with the high pressures of disc brakes.

Please everyone, do not flare brake lines with a single flaring tool, and of course use the reamer after cutting................

Regards,

Alanco
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 02:25 PM
  #43  
GreatNorthWoods's Avatar
GreatNorthWoods
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 8,813
Likes: 13
From: Littleton, New Hampshire
Alanco,

Well that's just my lousy luck.

Blaming Chrysler won't get my brakes working.

What are unlapped gearsets?

Bobby,

Just don't go there...
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 04:18 PM
  #44  
51dueller's Avatar
51dueller
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,682
Likes: 12
From: Saskatoon SK Canada
Unlapped gear sets means the pinion wasn't ground to promote seating of the ring and pinion. It would take longer for them to break-in without it.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
raven3
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
10
Jan 2, 2015 12:07 AM
ike55
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
Dec 24, 2014 04:38 PM
PAwhiteboy
WTB - Parts & other
1
Jun 7, 2013 08:04 PM
ferguson777
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
33
Jul 18, 2006 01:53 PM
nebechanezer
Brakes, Steering, Suspension, Tires, & Wheels
1
Apr 14, 2005 08:01 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:49 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 10:59:05


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE