When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The rear wheel cylinders are the same ones off the 87 Chrysler so the wheel cylinder daimeter is moot. I used the complete Chrysler rear end with the brakes that were on it. All I did was dissemble them, clean throughly with alcohol, and reassemble. A brake job had just been done on the donor car so all the parts were new. Both rear wheel cylinders have clean fluid coming out when bled so there's no rust in them. I used a new rear brake hose as well as all new brake lines. There are no kinks or even sharp bends going to the rear. I replaced the MC with a rebuilt just to be sure it there was not a massive internal leak in the MC but no change. I'll have to think about rigging a pressure gauge but I'm not sure that would really tell me much. I have no idea how much line pressure is necessary to engage the rear brakes or make them engage before the front...or would I just be looking for any pressure at all? If that's the case I know I have some pressure because if I jack it up and push the brake pedal down I can't turn the rear wheels.
The rear wheel cylinders are the same ones off the 87 Chrysler so the wheel cylinder daimeter is moot. I used the complete Chrysler rear end with the brakes that were on it. All I did was dissemble them, clean throughly with alcohol, and reassemble. A brake job had just been done on the donor car so all the parts were new. Both rear wheel cylinders have clean fluid coming out when bled so there's no rust in them. I used a new rear brake hose as well as all new brake lines. There are no kinks or even sharp bends going to the rear. I replaced the MC with a rebuilt just to be sure it there was not a massive internal leak in the MC but no change. I'll have to think about rigging a pressure gauge but I'm not sure that would really tell me much. I have no idea how much line pressure is necessary to engage the rear brakes or make them engage before the front...or would I just be looking for any pressure at all? If that's the case I know I have some
pressure because if I jack it up and push the brake pedal down I can't turn the rear wheels.
Jeez, just after I looked up F3 brakes in the manual and found that they were not self energizing......
I think that the metering valve is the culprit: either that or the M/C has to be at fault as that is where the pressure comes from.....
One thing that CIAF neglected to mention was that all the early disk/drum setups did not even use a metering valve. You won't find any on Ford cars or Ford trucks to 1981. I was sure of this statement, but I looked up the facts in the service manuals.
The proportioning valve could also be at fault. After all, the basic line pressure to the rear is from the rear piston on the M/C and if the M/C went directly to the rear brakes, it should activate them very quickly because it is just the ratio of the two cylinders and the force on the pedal plus the booster pressure.
I tend to agree even though tests have indicated that the valve is good. I probably have another combination valve laying around in the garage somewhere I can try. Since the metering and proportioning is done by the combination valve if I eliminate it and run the lines directly from the MC what affect would that have on my brakes?
I tend to agree even though tests have indicated that the valve is good. I probably have another combination valve laying around in the garage somewhere I can try. Since the metering and proportioning is done by the combination valve if I eliminate it and run the lines directly from the MC what affect would that have on my brakes?
Vern
The rear brakes would be likely to actuate harder than the front.
I had forgotten that you used the entire rear suspension from the Chrysler (I sure thought I might have been onto something that time)
Getting rid of the proportioning valve would be a good test. It would be best to have one in the long run though. From what I have read they are designed to compensate for the weight transfer from rear to front during braking.
The only other thought I have on the whole system would be the brake pedal itself, specifically the ratio of the lever. I can't remember, did you use the brake pedal assy from the donor car or did you build your own?
I used the Chrysler brake pedal too. I wanted to use all the Chrysler stuff just like it came from the car so I would not have this very problem that I'm having...so much for planning!
LOL....
You don't suppose some nasty little creature (I'm not mentioning any species here, especially mice or anything like that) might have gotten inside the brake system while you had it all apart and built a nest in there do you?
I used the Chrysler brake pedal too. I wanted to use all the Chrysler stuff just like it came from the car so I would not have this very problem that I'm having...so much for planning!
I have to work on Dodge Trucks and Chrysler Products, although I prefer not to, and their quality is so low and their computer systems are as bad as Fords, so I figure your brakes work as well as they did in the donor truck or car. (must be a truck as they did not have rwd cars in 87.) So don't blame yourself. Their rear ends are pretty good other than the fact that they use unlapped gearsets on new vehicles.
So don't blame yourself, blame Chrysler..........................
I havent read this whole string but one thing an old builder showed me first hand while doing brakes is to take a drill bit inside every cut line where he has a joint and opens the line up if its restricted from burs or tube cutters. We were building a 40 Convertible and he showed me this trick. I was holding a brake line and said it looks fine he stopped me. He had the drill bit already laid out from working on it the previouse day. He runs it inside the cut tube just to make sure its open to spec.
He then told me how hes tacked down brake problems to restricted lines on other customer scars.
Thats a good tip to remember when your scratching your head.
I havent read this whole string but one thing an old builder showed me first hand while doing brakes is to take a drill bit inside every cut line where he has a joint and opens the line up if its restricted from burs or tube cutters. We were building a 40 Convertible and he showed me this trick. I was holding a brake line and said it looks fine he stopped me. He had the drill bit already laid out from working on it the previouse day. He runs it inside the cut tube just to make sure its open to spec.
He then told me how hes tacked down brake problems to restricted lines on other customer scars.
Thats a good tip to remember when your scratching your head.
If you are using a flaring tool, it has a tapered reamer blade on it to ream the cut end. Secondly, with brakes, and their high pressures, use of a double flaring tool is mandantory. When you use a double flaring tool, you must ream the tubing to start the flaring process with the flare tooling which fits into the tubing innter diameter. This tool bows out the tubing, and leaves a flat area which is flared directly with the tool when the tooling is removed. While a single flare with steel tubing will work on the lower pressures with drum brakes, particularly Bendix self energizing brakes, it will not be reliable with the high pressures of disc brakes.
Please everyone, do not flare brake lines with a single flaring tool, and of course use the reamer after cutting................
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.