Notices
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

302 ford motor question.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 25, 2006 | 11:09 PM
  #1  
papabills54's Avatar
papabills54
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
15 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, Nevada
302 ford motor question.

hi guy's, I have a 54 ford pu with a [supposedly] 84-86 302 motor I looked at several motor manuals and they say to look at the decal under the hood for the correct timming degree setting. From the 70's to 80's there are different settings fron 6 degrees btc to 14 degrees btc any one know what the setting is for an 84-86. I installed a little hotter cam and lifter set from edelbrock and chain and sprocket. I also put in a edelbrock 600 series carb. The motor starts right up but sounds a little rough at idle. My spark plugs are caked with black carbor [not wet] so I think it is probally timming. I took it out for a little spin and it definately has no power. oops I forgot to say I also put in a mallory distributor cuz I couldn't get that darn dura spark piece to work. Its running with no back fire but it runs like do do . I have no idea what this motor came out of. any help would be appreciated. bill
 
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2006 | 11:16 PM
  #2  
papabills54's Avatar
papabills54
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
15 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, Nevada
Me again, Im wondering if I might need hotter plugs for this puppy. these are the wide gap plugs [.050 gap] . Are thoes the correct plugs for that year stock 302?
 
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2006 | 12:30 AM
  #3  
51dueller's Avatar
51dueller
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,682
Likes: 12
From: Saskatoon SK Canada
It should be 10' BTDC. Not sure on the plug gap.
 
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2006 | 12:34 AM
  #4  
mtflat's Avatar
mtflat
Lead Driver
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,776
Likes: 553
From: Kalispell, MT
I'll confuse you a little more probably. '86 was the first EFI and initial timing is 10 deg BTDC. Plugs I'm using are Autolite AP 24's. Stock plugs call for ASF 42 and gap .042-.046

I've got a rad support with a sticker from an '83 and it says 8 deg BTDC. Also, stock plugs call for ASF 42 and gap .042-.046

Earlier 302's used Autolite 45's and I used to gap them .035

You might want to check with Edelbrock and see what they recommend for timing with the cam you're running.

Funny the Duraspark II didn't work for you - they're just about bulletproof.
 

Last edited by mtflat; Oct 26, 2006 at 12:43 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2006 | 08:15 AM
  #5  
ALBUQ F-1's Avatar
ALBUQ F-1
Fleet Owner
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 27,294
Likes: 1,055
From: NM
What kind of Mallory is it? If it's not a jigh-energy type system (i.e., just points) it may not fire the large gaps. If it's an electronic dizzy, what are you using to fire it, an MSD?

If it's an 86 it was probably a CFI (throttle body fuel injection) engine, somewhere in there they transitioned to multi-port EFI on the high-end cars. If it was CFI they had really low compression and were only rated 125 HP, so don't know how well it will respond to hot rodding.
 
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2006 | 11:15 AM
  #6  
mtflat's Avatar
mtflat
Lead Driver
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,776
Likes: 553
From: Kalispell, MT
Originally Posted by ALBUQ F-1
If it's an 86 it was probably a CFI (throttle body fuel injection) engine, somewhere in there they transitioned to multi-port EFI on the high-end cars. If it was CFI they had really low compression and were only rated 125 HP, so don't know how well it will respond to hot rodding.
I've heard that, but mine is multi-port. Just added a picture to my gallery for another thread last night.

However, my '86 was built in Canada Oct 86 - it should have been an '87 by some counts, so it is a combobulation of parts.
 
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2006 | 11:33 AM
  #7  
imlowr2's Avatar
imlowr2
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,005
Likes: 2
From: Santa Clarita
It's really hard to say why it's running like "po po". It could be a number of things, including the ignition wires being bad, carb needs to be rebuilt, vacuum leaks etc. I would start at changing the plugs and plug wires. then vacuum leaks at the manifold/ hoses and then the carb.
 
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2006 | 12:55 PM
  #8  
Okiedokie's Avatar
Okiedokie
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,622
Likes: 3
From: okla
Club FTE Silver Member

Sure it is not an HO motor with same firing order of a 351W?
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-1

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-4

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-6

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
Old Oct 26, 2006 | 06:02 PM
  #9  
51dueller's Avatar
51dueller
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,682
Likes: 12
From: Saskatoon SK Canada
The Ford CFI was from 83-85 and some '86 models. In '86 5.0L truck and Mustang engines got the new EFI setup but the Mustang was sequential injection instead of batch fired. I have a '84 Mustang 5.0L CFI engine in my '51 but I have went to the later Mustang SEFI. My engine stock was 165hp and 8.4:1 compression. In '85 when they put the shorty headers in the Mustangs, the CFI (CFI's didn't get the roller cam) were then rated at 180hp.
 
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2006 | 06:15 PM
  #10  
WillyB's Avatar
WillyB
Post Fiend
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,231
Likes: 1
From: Near Fresno, California
Who is talking efi? he states: "I installed a little hotter cam and lifter set from edelbrock and chain and sprocket. I also put in a edelbrock 600 series carb. "

I expect he has a carb on his engine - and 600 cfm is a lot of carb for 302 cubic inches.

To answer his question, why not use a vaccum gage instead of a timing light to set your timing? Set it for best vacuum at idle, then check what it is using your timing light. The idle jets and the idle speed adjustment interact, so you have to go back and forth between the two, looking for a smooth idle at around 800 RPM.

This changes a bit with timing, so there is 4 items you have to adjust at the same time - the two idle jets, the idle speed, and the timing.

It sounds like you are a bit over carb-ed, my guess is that you will need to play with all your carb adjustments and jet sizes to get good performance and drivability. Also, remember that your cam can cause problems with your idle.

Good Luck, and please post back what works.

.
 
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2006 | 06:52 PM
  #11  
mtflat's Avatar
mtflat
Lead Driver
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,776
Likes: 553
From: Kalispell, MT
*****, I started talking about efi's 'cause his original question included '86's which were efi's. I figured the plug gap and initial timing might be different.

I agree with you about the over-carb issue. My son in law runs a 82 mustang with a 302/edelbrock intake/comp cam/570 cfm street avenger, etc. It's about all the carb that 302 can handle.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captain1997
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
11
Apr 6, 2013 12:54 PM
jeep-rally
WTB - Parts & other
3
Dec 29, 2012 02:54 AM
Ford Big Rig
WTB - Ford Trucks & other vehicles
2
Nov 29, 2012 10:00 PM
73 fourxfour
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
7
Jul 9, 2010 01:08 PM
papabills54
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
Jun 30, 2008 11:59 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:55 AM.

story-0
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-02 21:45:57


VIEW MORE
story-1
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-3
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-5
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-6
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-7
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-9
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE