2004 - 2008 F150 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 Ford F150's with 5.4 V8, 4.6 V8 engine
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

5.4 vs. 4.6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 10-11-2006, 02:28 AM
exiled's Avatar
exiled
exiled is online now
Cargo Master
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by veronese1
I can't imagine the truck with less power. It is under powered as it is with the 5.4L 3V.

Ugh...
amen. i think they should cram the 6.8 down in it.
 
  #17  
Old 10-11-2006, 01:37 PM
jcp123's Avatar
jcp123
jcp123 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Milpitas, CA; Tyler, TX
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You know, when my Dad first bought his '05 SCrew, I was not terribly impressed with the little 281, even with 3.73's. I was set up to not like it since I had driven an '03 Mustang GT and was thoroughly unimpressed by its low end response and torque in that application as well. Even my 302 Bronco had more jump off the line than the 281 in either application, and would have given my Dad's SCrew a run for its money even with a 45hp and 20lb-ft (at the peak, anyway) handicap.

But having driven it more and more, and used it for towing, I have to say that the 281 is a decent little engine. We towed a '61 Mercedes (ca. 2800lbs + trailer, about 4200lbs total) from Fort Worth to Tyler (about 120 miles), and the 281 did a great job handling it, and it even got pretty decent gas mileage in the bargain. We have gotten a little better than 20mpg on a long highway trip with three people, overnight bags, and using the a/c the whole way. I would still rather have the 331, but the 281 is a nice little engine that does its job quietly and without drawing attention to itself - even if it takes you 5 months of living with it to realize it .

Oh, and as a side bonus, the stock exhaust is pretty bawdy sounding...for a stock exhaust It's nice to actually be able to hear some V8 staccato in the cab.
 
  #18  
Old 10-11-2006, 08:09 PM
veronese1's Avatar
veronese1
veronese1 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another one...

Did he say handled towing 4K LBS well and got good fuel ecomony???

Please, someone chime in and admit their leg was sore from holding the accelerator against the radiator supports wayyyyyy out front.
 
  #19  
Old 10-11-2006, 09:42 PM
hllon4whls's Avatar
hllon4whls
hllon4whls is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Mandeville, La
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by veronese1
Another one...

Did he say handled towing 4K LBS well and got good fuel ecomony???

Please, someone chime in and admit their leg was sore from holding the accelerator against the radiator supports wayyyyyy out front.
Im with you. I bought the truck and overall I like it. I have a crew 4x4 6.5 box 3.55s and 18's. I feel that the 5.4 has good mid range but lacks in the lower and upper bands. Doesnt feel like 300 hp to me. Trucks just dynoed on at 200hp to the tires. Thats a lot of drivetrain loss.
 
  #20  
Old 10-11-2006, 09:42 PM
zach's Avatar
zach
zach is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had a '97 F-150 4.6 and it was a sweet truck but alittle low on the power side with bad MPG about 13. I recently bought a '04 5.4 and it gets 15.8. I think u have to get on the 4.6 so much that i kills the MPG!?
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
stewbob
6.4L Power Stroke Diesel
9
01-07-2011 11:09 AM
Paul Goebel
1999 to 2016 Super Duty
5
01-04-2011 10:15 AM
robjs111
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco
18
03-10-2009 10:28 AM
a gennaro
New Member Introductions
1
06-15-2006 12:34 PM
conrad kornell
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
8
07-21-2003 10:28 PM



Quick Reply: 5.4 vs. 4.6



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:07 PM.