When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I've heard good out of the 4.0 and 3.0. 3.0 has been around longer.
If both engines are in good condition, they should last a virtually identical amount of time. I've had personal experience with a 4.0 with over 200K. It still ran like new, but the tranny was toasted (M5OD) from power shifts.
Performance wise the 4.0 is leaps ahead, yet the 3.0 is also known as a durable long running engine but lacks in the real power that a V-6 should have.
In a 4x4 you want the 4.0, alot more torque. Call me crazy, but if I didn't get the 4.0, I would rather have the 4 banger, It has more power potential in the long run than the 3.0, and you can rev it like crazy .
The 4.0 is so easy to find, around here you can get hit by one if you look too hard. if your looking for something to keep for the longrun, the 4.0 is the better dael. i did alot to mine, and at 100k it's like a new engine.
Alan, isn't most of your engine essentially new, lol. I have to agree with Wendell about having a 2.3l DTech over the Vulcan 3.0, for virtually the same HP output stock, why not have the mileage of a 4cyl?
If you name isn't Alan David, it should be, it sounds cool. I'm Wendell D., the D stands for Dawson, Wendell Dawson Borror, now if that ain't a bunch of hillbilly names slewn together ha ha.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.