More Power
Thread Starter
|
Trailering
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 17
Likes: 1
From: Smokey Mountains
More Power
Hey There. I am new to the 4 cylinders and am trying to figure out just what I can do to mine. 99 in a Ranger w/auto trans. I have a decided lack of power with mine plus mileage is terrible. Can I get a cold air intake and change timing events? Is there a better way to go? I would prefer to work with the 2.5 instead of putting in a 5.0 like everyone around here suggests. Thanks for any help you can give me.
Mike
Mike
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,147
Likes: 0
With the auto, there isn't much gonna help unless it's forced induction, One major restriction on the lima, is the head, it doesn't flow well. A port, and polish, cam, and header would help, there are also aftermarket heads available.With an auto tranny, a turbo would be your best bet for any real noticable difference. If you had a manual, I'ld go with some bolt on's, and head work. Maybe others will have some idea's.
Junior User
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Sure makes you wonder what the engineers were on when they designed that head, doesn't it? Would they purposely design it to get such poor performance, including mileage?
I am going to spend the winter redoing a head for mine, the usual port/polish etc, plus open up the exhaust (that livened up my 200"6); we will see if my pension will allow a Racer Walsh header or not! Gonna look for a heavier cam in there as well.
I am going to spend the winter redoing a head for mine, the usual port/polish etc, plus open up the exhaust (that livened up my 200"6); we will see if my pension will allow a Racer Walsh header or not! Gonna look for a heavier cam in there as well.
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,978
Likes: 1
From: Alvin, Texas.
Well, the Lima head was designed in the late 60s or 70s, so emissions was something they were shooting for back then. Of course, techonology is better and we see better ways to accomplish that goal now...
Until Jag-u-ar designed the Tritons/Intech OHC engines, pretty much all Ford heads flowed like garbage as it is...I can see the cheaping out coming from not updating things until the newer I4 was brought out by Mazda.
Until Jag-u-ar designed the Tritons/Intech OHC engines, pretty much all Ford heads flowed like garbage as it is...I can see the cheaping out coming from not updating things until the newer I4 was brought out by Mazda.
Junior User
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Hmmm... I always equated "efficiency" with getting the best out of the fuel burned, meaning you get great fuel mileage if the engine is burning EVERY drop as effectively as possible. Silly me...
Decades ago, I was able to get 20% more mileage out of my engine, simply by aggressively changing the manufacturer's design; I had Mr. Vizard to thank for that, but I have yet to find a modification document that equals the effectiveness of his recommended changes. I am not afraid to go at a cylinder head with grinding tools, all I need is a bit of guidance!
Even the mods I did to my I-6 made a big differnce to its performance, not only hilclimbing ability, but fuel mileage as well. Designing something correctly is no more difficult than designing it poorly.
Any hints on what I need to do to the combustion chambers on this pig?
Decades ago, I was able to get 20% more mileage out of my engine, simply by aggressively changing the manufacturer's design; I had Mr. Vizard to thank for that, but I have yet to find a modification document that equals the effectiveness of his recommended changes. I am not afraid to go at a cylinder head with grinding tools, all I need is a bit of guidance!
Even the mods I did to my I-6 made a big differnce to its performance, not only hilclimbing ability, but fuel mileage as well. Designing something correctly is no more difficult than designing it poorly.
Any hints on what I need to do to the combustion chambers on this pig?
Posting Guru
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,448
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by TLyttle
Sure makes you wonder what the engineers were on when they designed that head, doesn't it? Would they purposely design it to get such poor performance, including mileage?
I had a 99 auto and it got 21.5 mpg. It was a short bed, standard cab.
jd
Junior User
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
I get all that, but my Toyota got much better than that ~25mpgUS, and was California legal. And I would bet that it would tow a 2.3 backwards: more torque, better ratios, 15 more hp: where was Ford??
I like Fords, wouldn't own another full-size truck; my 300" 6s served me extremely well, and will be the basis for my next project. My wife is a Mustang nut, and She Who Must Be Obeyed will have a Mustang until she doesn't want one any more. I am close to dumping the 2.3 and installing the fresh 3.8 V6 in its place; the only thing stopping me is the fact that I LIKE 4-holers.
But I am really disappointed with the 2.3 technology.
I like Fords, wouldn't own another full-size truck; my 300" 6s served me extremely well, and will be the basis for my next project. My wife is a Mustang nut, and She Who Must Be Obeyed will have a Mustang until she doesn't want one any more. I am close to dumping the 2.3 and installing the fresh 3.8 V6 in its place; the only thing stopping me is the fact that I LIKE 4-holers.
But I am really disappointed with the 2.3 technology.
Trending Topics
Posting Guru
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,448
Likes: 1
FTE Stories
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)
Michael S. Palmer
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer
Joe Kucinski
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)
Brett Foote
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies
Joe Kucinski
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make
Brett Foote
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!
Michael S. Palmer
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home
Verdad Gallardo
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!
Joe Kucinski
Junior User
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
79 lwb pickup. I pulled it apart for another project (the infamous "Lumbergini"), and did nothing to the engine which had ~200,00 miles (not kms) on it, and it ran for years after. It started to burn a bit of oil, so I did a rering (no need for a rebore!) and bearing change, still runs sweet as a nut.
I have owned a few of those engines, and never had to touch them; turns out the oil problem had to do with valve seals.
Also, there's a guy in NY who owns a Volvo P1800 with 2 MILLION miles on it; original engine, though I don't know how many times that it has been rebuilt. THAT is how to build an engine: it gives away nearly half a litre displacement, but pulls 115hp, and the same torque.
I have owned a few of those engines, and never had to touch them; turns out the oil problem had to do with valve seals.
Also, there's a guy in NY who owns a Volvo P1800 with 2 MILLION miles on it; original engine, though I don't know how many times that it has been rebuilt. THAT is how to build an engine: it gives away nearly half a litre displacement, but pulls 115hp, and the same torque.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post