4.6 vs 5.4
Junior User
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ncranchero
I sure appreciate the MPG/engine size/ratio reports. 
I'll probably try for a 5.4L but won't be disappointed if I end up with a 4.6L. The 3.55 ratio seems to be the best for mileage when keeping with the stock tire size or at least close. I have a buyer for my '95 
so it looks like I'll be "movin' on up" to the '97-'03 model and board real soon. 
Thanks again!!!
I'll probably try for a 5.4L but won't be disappointed if I end up with a 4.6L. The 3.55 ratio seems to be the best for mileage when keeping with the stock tire size or at least close. I have a buyer for my '95 so it looks like I'll be "movin' on up" to the '97-'03 model and board real soon. Thanks again!!!Good luck on your hunt for a new truck!
New User
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
I just recently bought a 1998 4.6 super cab and it's got plenty of get up and go power for me and passing with it is no problem on the highway. I came from a intrigue with a 3.5 L and that thing was really peppy and haven't missed it 1 bit. If you expect something to be racing everything on the road with then a large truck no matter the engine is not gonna be a good choice
New User
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: mendon,il
dleebold
well said paul.i test drove a new(in 04)body style,and the old heritage body.-----the ride,power,seat feel, was better in my view in the old body style.so i bought the old.now i'm glad i did as the first production year of the new body had a few bugs. 
Elder User
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
From: Cottage Grove, Minnesota
Yesterday I took a trip down to southern MN about 175 miles round trip, and burned a little over a 1/4 tank. By my rough calculation I assume I am getting about 19-21mpg on the highway while cruising at 65 mph.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
