Notices

460 ford head identification

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 26, 2006 | 08:33 AM
  #31  
RapidRuss's Avatar
RapidRuss
FE "Freakin Expensive"
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,461
Likes: 4
From: Smith Mountain Lake, VA
Club FTE Silver Member

Well I thought it was kinda funny myself....Cause I had never known Paul or Dave to hang out in here? LOL.... But Paul did say he lurks?? LOL..

Anyway enough is enough....were all good to go now!! LOL...

Russ
 
Old Jun 26, 2006 | 10:58 AM
  #32  
Falcon67's Avatar
Falcon67
Mountain Pass
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 207
Likes: 78
Originally Posted by fomocofan
That is where my numbers came from, if they are wrong you are calling them wrong...not me..so I dont care...
Here is the link:
http://raceabilene.com/kelly/hotrod/engine3.html

Scroll down you will see the 429CJ numbers I qouted and the D3 D4 PI numbers...
And I said nothing about D3AE PI heads, I dont know where that comes from..
Thanks for the reference to my site. Those numbers are gleaned from numerous publications and offered up to the community in hopes of helping people put some kind of ID on a part. First and foremost - they are not guarranteed to be right or absolute in accuracy. You can't - this is Ford we're talking about here. There are a ton of things that Ford did that are either completely undocumented or documented wrong. I (we as a community really) rely on people like Paul and others that spend a great deal of time working with the specifics to get the straight scoop. For the pages that you reference, I rely on these folks and others to point out things that need correction - either directly via email or through discussions like this. Misinformation can be carried forward for years. A specific fer-instance is the 73-74 351C 4V heads. A lot of books that you buy will list these like any other 4V open chamber 351C head. But - not so. They carry 2V valves in them, not the normal 4V size. This info IS correct in many of the Ford specific documents and in some of the early Engine Annuals, but somehow got overlooked when other individuals decided to write a book. It's called "fact checking" and apparently there a a lot of book writers that don't get around to it. The error still exists AFAIK in the most recent HP Ford Engine Parts Interchange Manual. That's nearly 30 years of carrying forward bad data.

Another example of mystery Ford stuff is the 71 Boss 302. Never hit production, not listed in any books - but got close enough to production that Ford made a strip kit for it. It was found on the shelf of a wrecking yard in the original Ford packaging about 30 miles from where I live.

Also remember that CASTING numbers are not PART numbers at Ford. There is a difference. A casting number is more a close reference to the original design and carries little specific information. Example: casting D2AE-CA 351C engine blocks - you find these as both 2 bolt and 4 bolt. I don't know the specific part numbers, but you can bet they are different.

So feel free to reference my reference, but please be open to the idea that there's an enormous amount of information out there in the hands of knowlegeable individuals, much more than is captured in any book or web site.

I've made corrections based on the info presented, hope that helps.
 
Old Jun 26, 2006 | 11:41 AM
  #33  
yomow's Avatar
yomow
Elder User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
From: Northern, Va
Why is this Question on this FE site----- 460 has there own side---------
Go there & ask the questions !!!!!!!!!! Russ was trying to help & got spanked.

Don
 
Old Jun 26, 2006 | 11:47 AM
  #34  
Bear 45/70's Avatar
Bear 45/70
Post Fiend
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 8
From: Union, Washington
Originally Posted by yomow
Why is this Question on this FE site----- 460 has there own side---------
Go there & ask the questions !!!!!!!!!! Russ was trying to help & got spanked.

Don
I wondered about that too. Mainly because it was posted on the 429/460 forum too.
 
Old Jun 26, 2006 | 11:55 AM
  #35  
76supercab2's Avatar
76supercab2
Postmaster
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,043
Likes: 4
Interesting, off topic thread. Pass the popcorn.




 
Old Jun 26, 2006 | 01:34 PM
  #36  
fomocofan's Avatar
fomocofan
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Falcon67
Thanks for the reference to my site. Those numbers are gleaned from numerous publications and offered up to the community in hopes of helping people put some kind of ID on a part. First and foremost - they are not guarranteed to be right or absolute in accuracy. You can't - this is Ford we're talking about here. There are a ton of things that Ford did that are either completely undocumented or documented wrong. I (we as a community really) rely on people like Paul and others that spend a great deal of time working with the specifics to get the straight scoop. For the pages that you reference, I rely on these folks and others to point out things that need correction - either directly via email or through discussions like this. Misinformation can be carried forward for years. A specific fer-instance is the 73-74 351C 4V heads. A lot of books that you buy will list these like any other 4V open chamber 351C head. But - not so. They carry 2V valves in them, not the normal 4V size. This info IS correct in many of the Ford specific documents and in some of the early Engine Annuals, but somehow got overlooked when other individuals decided to write a book. It's called "fact checking" and apparently there a a lot of book writers that don't get around to it. The error still exists AFAIK in the most recent HP Ford Engine Parts Interchange Manual. That's nearly 30 years of carrying forward bad data.

Another example of mystery Ford stuff is the 71 Boss 302. Never hit production, not listed in any books - but got close enough to production that Ford made a strip kit for it. It was found on the shelf of a wrecking yard in the original Ford packaging about 30 miles from where I live.

Also remember that CASTING numbers are not PART numbers at Ford. There is a difference. A casting number is more a close reference to the original design and carries little specific information. Example: casting D2AE-CA 351C engine blocks - you find these as both 2 bolt and 4 bolt. I don't know the specific part numbers, but you can bet they are different.

So feel free to reference my reference, but please be open to the idea that there's an enormous amount of information out there in the hands of knowlegeable individuals, much more than is captured in any book or web site.

I've made corrections based on the info presented, hope that helps.

That's wonderful, But he was calling me personally wrong and bad for spreading bad info when I was referenceing your site...As I said, it wasn't MY info it was yours...so it's no biggie to me either way...
I do not want to be blamed for muddying up the water and posting bad info when that info was gleaning off the net...It's not like I made it up!
 
Old Jun 26, 2006 | 01:40 PM
  #37  
monsterbaby's Avatar
monsterbaby
Hotshot
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 18,423
Likes: 9
From: iowa
Originally Posted by fomocofan
It's funny...CRM318 asked this on 460ford.com and somebody linked to the very same site I used and nobody called him on it!!!
http://www.460ford.com/viewtopic.php?t=3957
That person that linked him to Chris's site would be me, and if you notice he gave a specific casting number in that post on the other forum that matched up to a 351c head. I told him that and gave him a place to look for himself rather than just trust me. Now I may be mistaken, but Chris is more of a cleveland guy than a 385 series engine person, so I trust his stuff when it comes to cleveland stuff but like he states both in an earlier post here, and on his site itself the numbers are not gaurenteed accurate, it's just a reference point that could be wrong, and in the case of the cj head casting numbers it is wrong.
As to not ever having heard of Paul, well you found the 460 site he hangs out on appearently if you found that post, and if you have done any reading over there you will know he is very well respected, heck I wish I knew half of what paul has probably forgotten, I have spoken directly to him on the phone (never had the pleasure of actually meeting him but maybe someday) and found he is pleasent, and very knowledgable. Also his products are top notch, I personally run one of his stage one oil pumps in my race engine, and would recommend them to anyone that asks, just the workmanship and effort they put into them shows someone that truly loves these engines and knows how to make them work.
 
Old Jun 26, 2006 | 01:46 PM
  #38  
fomocofan's Avatar
fomocofan
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by monsterbaby
That person that linked him to Chris's site would be me, and if you notice he gave a specific casting number in that post on the other forum that matched up to a 351c head. I told him that and gave him a place to look for himself rather than just trust me. Now I may be mistaken, but Chris is more of a cleveland guy than a 385 series engine person, so I trust his stuff when it comes to cleveland stuff but like he states both in an earlier post here, and on his site itself the numbers are not gaurenteed accurate, it's just a reference point that could be wrong, and in the case of the cj head casting numbers it is wrong.
As to not ever having heard of Paul, well you found the 460 site he hangs out on appearently if you found that post, and if you have done any reading over there you will know he is very well respected, heck I wish I knew half of what paul has probably forgotten, I have spoken directly to him on the phone (never had the pleasure of actually meeting him but maybe someday) and found he is pleasent, and very knowledgable. Also his products are top notch, I personally run one of his stage one oil pumps in my race engine, and would recommend them to anyone that asks, just the workmanship and effort they put into them shows someone that truly loves these engines and knows how to make them work.

I'm just saying he shouldn't have jumped all over me for posting bad info when it came from that site...it is one of the few sites on the net that you CAN get numbers from...
I never guaranteed any info..As I said in this very thread, I hope the true info does come out...this is why we discuss it, hpefully...But, I don't need some jerk going off on me personally...I don't care how many motors he has built!!
 
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jun 26, 2006 | 04:09 PM
  #39  
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim
FTE Leadership Emeritus
20 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 161,999
Likes: 75
From: 3rd Rock
Club FTE Gold Member
fomocofan .....chill
 
Old Jun 26, 2006 | 07:20 PM
  #40  
idfergusson's Avatar
idfergusson
Senior User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
From: Regina,Saskatchewan
I think the C9VE-A casting number error might have its origins in the book " How to rebuild your Ford V-8 351c-351M-400-429-460 by Tom Monroe" as I have a copy published in 1980 that shows the C9VE-A heads listed in the 429CJ,SCJ and police section.I have found other errors in the book including the wrong firing order listed for a 429-460, I don't know if corrections were made in later copies.I have seen shop manuals with the wrong bolt torque specs listed and other errors so generally now if something doesn't seem right I check with a second source or ask someone with more knowledge than myself.I have a set of C9VE-A heads out in the garage,I wish they were CJ heads.
 
Old Jun 26, 2006 | 07:54 PM
  #41  
73XAFalcon's Avatar
73XAFalcon
Elder User
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: Sin City, USA
idfergusson

You may be on to something there. Tom Monroe's book is a nice coffee table book but there are several errors. Same can be said for Pat Ganahl's book. You see both quoted like gospel which just spreads the myths like Falcon67 said.
 
Old Jun 27, 2006 | 07:04 PM
  #42  
didgeytrucker's Avatar
didgeytrucker
New User
20 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Greenbrier, TN
Originally Posted by RapidRuss
Well the most disirable of the stock 460 heads are the C8.C9, and the infamuos D0VE-C heads..Made in 68,69 and 70....
Anybody who paid attention in grade school English class knows this means:

Well the most desirable of the stock 460 heads are the C8...Made in 68....

(and) the C9..Made in 69....

(and) the infamous D0VE-C heads..Made in 70....

Tracy
 
Old Jun 27, 2006 | 09:46 PM
  #43  
Stewart_H's Avatar
Stewart_H
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 29,380
Likes: 118
From: Central Coast of CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by didgeytrucker
Anybody who paid attention in grade school English class knows this means:

Well the most desirable of the stock 460 heads are the C8...Made in 68....

(and) the C9..Made in 69....

(and) the infamous D0VE-C heads..Made in 70....

Tracy
Or he could have just added one word, "respectively" to assure clarity.

Either way, I agree with you, Tracy.

Fomo, follow Tim's advice. Chill.

Stewart
 
Old Jun 27, 2006 | 10:07 PM
  #44  
John7894's Avatar
John7894
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,079
Likes: 11
From: LA and CO
This thread makes my head hurt......

I got the popcorn, and the drinks. Let me know and I'll pass them around.

RapidRuss, where you been hiding. Ain't seen you around the 460 site for a long time....


Oh, and BTW, I can vouch for Paul Kane, DILLIGAS Dave, RapidRuss, monsterbaby, idfergusson, and a few others that chimed in here. I guess you can say we all hang out on the most informative BBF site around. These guys know their chit! I hang out here too but mostly in the Super Duty and 7.3 forums.....

So, like I said before, if you need popcorn let me know......

Please continue. I'm still learning from these guys..........
 
Old Jun 28, 2006 | 03:06 PM
  #45  
RapidRuss's Avatar
RapidRuss
FE "Freakin Expensive"
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,461
Likes: 4
From: Smith Mountain Lake, VA
Club FTE Silver Member

LOL.. John... I had been offline for about a year..and had been working out of state quite a bit..... But I'am back and looking for work in state..no more out of state Chit!!!

Shoot I left, and came back and thought everyone left me? and forgot my name? LOL..Its Damn good to be back...about the only one that new where I was and I kept in contact with was FFRCobra001 (Glenn)

But I have learned now to watch my type after 12 beers!!! LMAO!!!

Later Bro!

Russ
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:32 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE