When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I've read in other threads that removing the restrictor horns from the air intake lines will improve fuel econcomy on my 460. Can anyone tell me why they are in there in the first place?
Dunno specifically- but "restrictions", baffles, diverters, etc. are usually put in EFI intake tubes for one of two reasons: either to a) quiet the air flow noise, aka "silencers"; or b) to alter the airflow in some way. This usually means straightening it out or reducing turbulence, but in some cases (not EFI, obviously) things are placed somewhere in the intake passage to enhance mixture distribution.
On the off chance you are referring to an air cleaner housing rather than EFI, there's the valve to divert hot air into the engine for faster warmups. Air cleaner housings also often have baffles to reduce noise.
The upshot is, take a look at what's there & where, & give it a try. If it's near the tube inlets, away from the intake, it's almost certainly for noise reduction. Another way to look at it: if aftermarket air kits replace those particular OE lines, it's probable the restrictors are for noise reduction.
Now, whether removing them will help much is another story, but at least it probably won't hurt anything.
I removed mine(90' EFI460) and it did seem to make a noticable improvement in the way the truck 'breathed'. It seemed to run and rev better, and seemed to improve power according to my SOTP meter and I would assume that if it makes enough difference that it can be felt, than it would be quite worthy and the best part is it just costs a little bit of your time.
By the looks of it, removing them would have to improve performance and relieve the intake tract of a restiction, which is always good. I didnt really notice much if any increase in noise.
I removed mine(90' EFI460) and it did seem to make a noticable improvement in the way the truck 'breathed'. It seemed to run and rev better, and seemed to improve power according to my SOTP meter and I would assume that if it makes enough difference that it can be felt, than it would be quite worthy and the best part is it just costs a little bit of your time.
By the looks of it, removing them would have to improve performance and relieve the intake tract of a restiction, which is always good. I didnt really notice much if any increase in noise.
I've know guys who mad mods to the cars and claimed they felt like the was a major improvement in performance. Then go to thw track and find they were slower than before. So if you rely on seat of the pants as a measure of preformance, you might as well believe your elected officials.
the only reason i did not mention it before was because it was not a back to back comparison(i.e. same day at the track) and i did not have a back to back dyno test or anything. But FYI- best time before was 17.0 and after the restrictor mod only on a maybe 10 degree cooler night 16.7! So there is your track time.
the only reason i did not mention it before was because it was not a back to back comparison(i.e. same day at the track) and i did not have a back to back dyno test or anything. But FYI- best time before was 17.0 and after the restrictor mod only on a maybe 10 degree cooler night 16.7! So there is your track time.
You dropped a second by removing a noise reducer? I find that extremely hard to believe. You do realize the kind of power increase it takes to drop a second in the quarter mile don't you and in a heavy truck to boot. Just not possible in anybody's world. Hell going to a straight ram air system on a 428CJ without an air cleaner gave less than a 1/10 in an aerodynamic car that weighed almost a 1000 pounds less.
You dropped a second by removing a noise reducer? I find that extremely hard to believe. You do realize the kind of power increase it takes to drop a second in the quarter mile don't you and in a heavy truck to boot. Just not possible in anybody's world.
I do believe you are the one with very little track experience and also not capable of reading numbers into the tenths. I picked up .3 tenths, not a full second and yes I do believe that is very possible because the slower a vehicle is, the easier it is for speed to increase with mods. My truck weighs in at 5560, which is heavier as you correctly pointed out, but while that is a handicap, I can see no reason that this would hinder its ability to respond to mods.
As a general rule in drag racing:
10HP=0.1
100lbs=0.1
Just to stir the pot a little:
- I saw a .3 drop in the et when taking the airfilter out of the box. This was done with 2 baseline passes and 3 post airfilter removed passes.
Originally Posted by Bear 45/70
You do realize the kind of power increase it takes to drop a second in the quarter mile don't you
- As a matter of fact I do. I saw a full second drop in the et with nitrous. BUT! On the dyno the nitrous only increased 40rwhp and 50rwtq???? For a total of 264rwhp/415rwtq(105* day and before the magnifico restrictor cutting mod)
Quieres tu papa
Last edited by stngh8r; Jun 12, 2006 at 09:40 AM.
Reason: change text
I do believe you are the one with very little track experience and also not capable of reading numbers into the tenths. I picked up .3 tenths, not a full second and yes I do believe that is very possible because the slower a vehicle is, the easier it is for speed to increase with mods. My truck weighs in at 5560, which is heavier as you correctly pointed out, but while that is a handicap, I can see no reason that this would hinder its ability to respond to mods.
As a general rule in drag racing:
10HP=0.1
100lbs=0.1
Just to stir the pot a little:
- I saw a .3 drop in the et when taking the airfilter out of the box. This was done with 2 baseline passes and 3 post airfilter removed passes.
- As a matter of fact I do. I saw a full second drop in the et with nitrous. BUT! On the dyno the nitrous only increased 40rwhp and 50rwtq???? For a total of 264rwhp/415rwtq(105* day and before the magnifico restrictor cutting mod)
Quieres tu papa
Little track experience? I was racing cars clear back in the 1960s (both drag and roundy-roundy) and did that for 20 some years then switched over to boats. I mechaniced, drove and owned. I even won some local championships back then. The boat racing I did real well at with several National Championships and some speed records. I still say there ain't no way a stinking air filter gave you 3/10s unless the filter was the dirtious thing on the planet or an air/noise divertor gave you a 1/10. By the way a general rule usually means one guy got it to work. An air filter is not gonna give you 10 hp for a 1/10 drp in ET much less 30 hp. Do you sell used cars too?
Bear, I am sorry that you doubt. I am also sorry that I got defensive in the first place. I, like yourself, am also very skeptical when people speak of gains they got and then find out they have no basis for their comments. I have logged many passes at the drag strip and have a few trophies as well(one was obtained weekend before last). As hard as it may be to believe, the clean paper air filter being removed on the same night showed .3 and the restrictor horn thing did help as well IMHO. The air horns in the intake tract of these EFI trucks are pretty small, so It would seem quite feasible to me to gain HP by removing it.
As far as the general rule thing, I agree, it is a general rule. My truck picked up a second with nitrous that only showed 40rwhp gain on the chassis dyno; on the contrary, my low 12sec ls1 vette barely picks up a 2/10s at best with a 50shot?
tsavino-sorry for the deviation in topic, please do give the restrictor horn thing a try, its not going to hurt and I feel that it is a worthy free mod.
Bear, I am sorry that you doubt. I am also sorry that I got defensive in the first place. I, like yourself, am also very skeptical when people speak of gains they got and then find out they have no basis for their comments. I have logged many passes at the drag strip and have a few trophies as well(one was obtained weekend before last). As hard as it may be to believe, the clean paper air filter being removed on the same night showed .3 and the restrictor horn thing did help as well IMHO. The air horns in the intake tract of these EFI trucks are pretty small, so It would seem quite feasible to me to gain HP by removing it.
As far as the general rule thing, I agree, it is a general rule. My truck picked up a second with nitrous that only showed 40rwhp gain on the chassis dyno; on the contrary, my low 12sec ls1 vette barely picks up a 2/10s at best with a 50shot?
tsavino-sorry for the deviation in topic, please do give the restrictor horn thing a try, its not going to hurt and I feel that it is a worthy free mod.
hehe, no I am not a car salesmen
Dr. E
Well, I sorry I got snooty too. I've be around a long time and seen a lot of things and heard a lot of claims that when it got down to it the claimer sort of dried up and blew away. It's true I don't have much car/truck EFI experience but I have a lot of marine EFI time but there the only intake restriction is a flame arrestor which flow air pretty well.
I have found that in drag racing the torque numbers effect ET and horsepower numbers effect mph normally. I once had a 3800 pound car with a 3:1 rearend that ran 14.7 at 99mph using first and second gear only. Switched to a 4.30 rear with the same tires and then ran 14.05 at 100mph. The gear changed multiplied the torque for a much better ET but horsepower remained pretty much the same.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.