Notices

Restrictor Horns

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 1, 2006 | 10:58 PM
  #1  
tsavino's Avatar
tsavino
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Restrictor Horns

I've read in other threads that removing the restrictor horns from the air intake lines will improve fuel econcomy on my 460. Can anyone tell me why they are in there in the first place?
 
Reply
Old May 2, 2006 | 01:56 AM
  #2  
Bear 45/70's Avatar
Bear 45/70
Post Fiend
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 8
From: Union, Washington
Sounds like and EFI deal. My '84 carb has no restrictors.
 
Reply
Old May 2, 2006 | 09:32 AM
  #3  
Homespun91's Avatar
Homespun91
More Turbo
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 682
Likes: 0
From: Peoria, IL (more or less)
Dunno specifically- but "restrictions", baffles, diverters, etc. are usually put in EFI intake tubes for one of two reasons: either to a) quiet the air flow noise, aka "silencers"; or b) to alter the airflow in some way. This usually means straightening it out or reducing turbulence, but in some cases (not EFI, obviously) things are placed somewhere in the intake passage to enhance mixture distribution.

On the off chance you are referring to an air cleaner housing rather than EFI, there's the valve to divert hot air into the engine for faster warmups. Air cleaner housings also often have baffles to reduce noise.

The upshot is, take a look at what's there & where, & give it a try. If it's near the tube inlets, away from the intake, it's almost certainly for noise reduction. Another way to look at it: if aftermarket air kits replace those particular OE lines, it's probable the restrictors are for noise reduction.

Now, whether removing them will help much is another story, but at least it probably won't hurt anything.
 
Reply
Old May 2, 2006 | 10:48 PM
  #4  
karljay's Avatar
karljay
Cargo Master
25 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,281
Likes: 18
From: Northern California
I've read that they are there for noise reduction. Someone did a project that involved removing them. I'd remove them and give it a try, can't hurt.
 
Reply
Old May 2, 2006 | 10:52 PM
  #5  
roadsiderob's Avatar
roadsiderob
Freshman User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
I removed mine...haven't noticed any add'l noise or MPG.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2006 | 05:36 PM
  #6  
stngh8r's Avatar
stngh8r
Senior User
15 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
From: Idabel, OK
I removed mine(90' EFI460) and it did seem to make a noticable improvement in the way the truck 'breathed'. It seemed to run and rev better, and seemed to improve power according to my SOTP meter and I would assume that if it makes enough difference that it can be felt, than it would be quite worthy and the best part is it just costs a little bit of your time.

By the looks of it, removing them would have to improve performance and relieve the intake tract of a restiction, which is always good. I didnt really notice much if any increase in noise.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2006 | 07:09 PM
  #7  
Bear 45/70's Avatar
Bear 45/70
Post Fiend
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 8
From: Union, Washington
Originally Posted by stngh8r
I removed mine(90' EFI460) and it did seem to make a noticable improvement in the way the truck 'breathed'. It seemed to run and rev better, and seemed to improve power according to my SOTP meter and I would assume that if it makes enough difference that it can be felt, than it would be quite worthy and the best part is it just costs a little bit of your time.

By the looks of it, removing them would have to improve performance and relieve the intake tract of a restiction, which is always good. I didnt really notice much if any increase in noise.
I've know guys who mad mods to the cars and claimed they felt like the was a major improvement in performance. Then go to thw track and find they were slower than before. So if you rely on seat of the pants as a measure of preformance, you might as well believe your elected officials.
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2006 | 08:55 AM
  #8  
stngh8r's Avatar
stngh8r
Senior User
15 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
From: Idabel, OK
I do go to the track quite often and after the restrictor mod i got my best time to that date. See the sig.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-2

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-3

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-4

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-9

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jun 8, 2006 | 10:05 AM
  #9  
stngh8r's Avatar
stngh8r
Senior User
15 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
From: Idabel, OK
the only reason i did not mention it before was because it was not a back to back comparison(i.e. same day at the track) and i did not have a back to back dyno test or anything. But FYI- best time before was 17.0 and after the restrictor mod only on a maybe 10 degree cooler night 16.7! So there is your track time.
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2006 | 11:15 AM
  #10  
Bear 45/70's Avatar
Bear 45/70
Post Fiend
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 8
From: Union, Washington
Originally Posted by stngh8r
the only reason i did not mention it before was because it was not a back to back comparison(i.e. same day at the track) and i did not have a back to back dyno test or anything. But FYI- best time before was 17.0 and after the restrictor mod only on a maybe 10 degree cooler night 16.7! So there is your track time.
You dropped a second by removing a noise reducer? I find that extremely hard to believe. You do realize the kind of power increase it takes to drop a second in the quarter mile don't you and in a heavy truck to boot. Just not possible in anybody's world. Hell going to a straight ram air system on a 428CJ without an air cleaner gave less than a 1/10 in an aerodynamic car that weighed almost a 1000 pounds less.
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2006 | 09:28 AM
  #11  
stngh8r's Avatar
stngh8r
Senior User
15 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
From: Idabel, OK
Exclamation Drag Racing 101 is now in session

Originally Posted by Bear 45/70
You dropped a second by removing a noise reducer? I find that extremely hard to believe. You do realize the kind of power increase it takes to drop a second in the quarter mile don't you and in a heavy truck to boot. Just not possible in anybody's world.
I do believe you are the one with very little track experience and also not capable of reading numbers into the tenths. I picked up .3 tenths, not a full second and yes I do believe that is very possible because the slower a vehicle is, the easier it is for speed to increase with mods. My truck weighs in at 5560, which is heavier as you correctly pointed out, but while that is a handicap, I can see no reason that this would hinder its ability to respond to mods.

As a general rule in drag racing:
10HP=0.1
100lbs=0.1

Just to stir the pot a little:
- I saw a .3 drop in the et when taking the airfilter out of the box. This was done with 2 baseline passes and 3 post airfilter removed passes.

Originally Posted by Bear 45/70
You do realize the kind of power increase it takes to drop a second in the quarter mile don't you
- As a matter of fact I do. I saw a full second drop in the et with nitrous. BUT! On the dyno the nitrous only increased 40rwhp and 50rwtq???? For a total of 264rwhp/415rwtq(105* day and before the magnifico restrictor cutting mod)


Quieres tu papa
 

Last edited by stngh8r; Jun 12, 2006 at 09:40 AM. Reason: change text
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2006 | 12:54 PM
  #12  
Bear 45/70's Avatar
Bear 45/70
Post Fiend
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 8
From: Union, Washington
Originally Posted by stngh8r
I do believe you are the one with very little track experience and also not capable of reading numbers into the tenths. I picked up .3 tenths, not a full second and yes I do believe that is very possible because the slower a vehicle is, the easier it is for speed to increase with mods. My truck weighs in at 5560, which is heavier as you correctly pointed out, but while that is a handicap, I can see no reason that this would hinder its ability to respond to mods.

As a general rule in drag racing:
10HP=0.1
100lbs=0.1

Just to stir the pot a little:
- I saw a .3 drop in the et when taking the airfilter out of the box. This was done with 2 baseline passes and 3 post airfilter removed passes.


- As a matter of fact I do. I saw a full second drop in the et with nitrous. BUT! On the dyno the nitrous only increased 40rwhp and 50rwtq???? For a total of 264rwhp/415rwtq(105* day and before the magnifico restrictor cutting mod)


Quieres tu papa
Little track experience? I was racing cars clear back in the 1960s (both drag and roundy-roundy) and did that for 20 some years then switched over to boats. I mechaniced, drove and owned. I even won some local championships back then. The boat racing I did real well at with several National Championships and some speed records. I still say there ain't no way a stinking air filter gave you 3/10s unless the filter was the dirtious thing on the planet or an air/noise divertor gave you a 1/10. By the way a general rule usually means one guy got it to work. An air filter is not gonna give you 10 hp for a 1/10 drp in ET much less 30 hp. Do you sell used cars too?
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2006 | 01:18 PM
  #13  
stngh8r's Avatar
stngh8r
Senior User
15 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
From: Idabel, OK
Bear, I am sorry that you doubt. I am also sorry that I got defensive in the first place. I, like yourself, am also very skeptical when people speak of gains they got and then find out they have no basis for their comments. I have logged many passes at the drag strip and have a few trophies as well(one was obtained weekend before last). As hard as it may be to believe, the clean paper air filter being removed on the same night showed .3 and the restrictor horn thing did help as well IMHO. The air horns in the intake tract of these EFI trucks are pretty small, so It would seem quite feasible to me to gain HP by removing it.

As far as the general rule thing, I agree, it is a general rule. My truck picked up a second with nitrous that only showed 40rwhp gain on the chassis dyno; on the contrary, my low 12sec ls1 vette barely picks up a 2/10s at best with a 50shot?

tsavino-sorry for the deviation in topic, please do give the restrictor horn thing a try, its not going to hurt and I feel that it is a worthy free mod.

hehe, no I am not a car salesmen

Dr. E
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2006 | 04:05 PM
  #14  
Bear 45/70's Avatar
Bear 45/70
Post Fiend
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 8
From: Union, Washington
Originally Posted by stngh8r
Bear, I am sorry that you doubt. I am also sorry that I got defensive in the first place. I, like yourself, am also very skeptical when people speak of gains they got and then find out they have no basis for their comments. I have logged many passes at the drag strip and have a few trophies as well(one was obtained weekend before last). As hard as it may be to believe, the clean paper air filter being removed on the same night showed .3 and the restrictor horn thing did help as well IMHO. The air horns in the intake tract of these EFI trucks are pretty small, so It would seem quite feasible to me to gain HP by removing it.

As far as the general rule thing, I agree, it is a general rule. My truck picked up a second with nitrous that only showed 40rwhp gain on the chassis dyno; on the contrary, my low 12sec ls1 vette barely picks up a 2/10s at best with a 50shot?

tsavino-sorry for the deviation in topic, please do give the restrictor horn thing a try, its not going to hurt and I feel that it is a worthy free mod.

hehe, no I am not a car salesmen

Dr. E
Well, I sorry I got snooty too. I've be around a long time and seen a lot of things and heard a lot of claims that when it got down to it the claimer sort of dried up and blew away. It's true I don't have much car/truck EFI experience but I have a lot of marine EFI time but there the only intake restriction is a flame arrestor which flow air pretty well.

I have found that in drag racing the torque numbers effect ET and horsepower numbers effect mph normally. I once had a 3800 pound car with a 3:1 rearend that ran 14.7 at 99mph using first and second gear only. Switched to a 4.30 rear with the same tires and then ran 14.05 at 100mph. The gear changed multiplied the torque for a much better ET but horsepower remained pretty much the same.
 
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2006 | 10:26 PM
  #15  
Uglyhat's Avatar
Uglyhat
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: Klamath Falls, Orygun
nice to see you two worked things out.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
coolfeet
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
6
Jan 8, 2019 10:17 AM
overbore66
Big Block V8 - 385 Series (6.1/370, 7.0/429, 7.5/460)
2
Jul 5, 2010 10:50 AM
stngh8r
Big Block V8 - 385 Series (6.1/370, 7.0/429, 7.5/460)
2
Oct 15, 2005 01:45 PM
ac1108
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
14
Nov 28, 2004 12:22 PM
jowilker
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
6
Jan 17, 2001 12:23 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:56 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-1
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-3
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-6
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-9
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE