Notices
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Slick Sixties Ford Truck

New Engine Choices

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 1, 2006 | 04:55 PM
  #1  
1963F100inNC's Avatar
1963F100inNC
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Question New Engine Choices

Hello,

I bought a 1963 F100, and am interested in which engines I can put in to replace the shot 223. I want to swap out engines, however, I am not into body cutting and welding, since I don't have the equipment.

So what will work? it has the 3 speed on the tree as well. I might need to rebuild or change it out as well. Are the any v-8's that will work well?

I am certainly new at this so any help would be appreciated.

Thanks

Geno

And IF YOU HAVE AN ENGINE FOR ME IN NORTH CAROLINA let me know. I want to drop it in and go...so no tuckered out motors.
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2006 | 06:55 PM
  #2  
Sam_Fear's Avatar
Sam_Fear
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 2
From: Davenport, IA
The bad news: your '63 has a front motor mount and the only V8's that will fit in there stock are the old Y-blocks. 292, 312. If you want something newer or different, you'll have to change the mounts.

The good news: it's fairly easy to put a side mount set up in and there is lots of room to work with.

Somebody else can give you the details...
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2006 | 07:43 PM
  #3  
banjopicker66's Avatar
banjopicker66
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,613
Likes: 6
From: Coal country
Actually, there is ONE possible option: An FE motor (352, 360, 390 and more) IF and ONLY IF you can find a '65 - '66 4x4 with the 352 engine and complete mounting system in it.
You will need all the motor mounts, bell housing, everything between the front frame member and the front of the transmission.

The '65/'66 4x4 used the older design frame and motor mount system such as your truck has, but offered a 352 option.
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2006 | 08:14 PM
  #4  
Highboy4x4's Avatar
Highboy4x4
Mountain Pass
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 211
Likes: 9
From: Beckley, WV
Don't forget that the 1965-66 F350 and larger trucks also had that front engine mount as well on the FE motor as the frames were still using the straight front axle. (I personally would also change the timing belt cover since the aluminum housings don't have the proper support to hold the weight of the FE engine) I'm not sure about using the bell housing off the trucks that are larger than the F350 models because I think the transmission mounts may be larger is size, but I could be wrong. Lewis
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2006 | 08:28 PM
  #5  
banjopicker66's Avatar
banjopicker66
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,613
Likes: 6
From: Coal country
Correct on the 350 and higher - but there is a potential conflict here. Many of the larger trucks used the FT engine - and the FT front timing cover won't seal around the FE crankshaft. The FT cranks have a larger snout.
The front mount and timing cover from a 352 in a '65/'66 4x4 will fit, fit correctly and work properly as well.
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2006 | 09:30 PM
  #6  
1963F100inNC's Avatar
1963F100inNC
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Lightbulb

Hmmmm. Sounds like the first catch would be to find a donor vehicle to do the change over to a 352. But, in the meantime, I want to be driving my truck. If I don't drive it, and it sits and sits, then + + = an eventual loss of interest and a new lawn ornament.

IF such an undertaking would be done, then what books would be suggested? Manual-wise? Custom-wise? Would getting a manual that breaks-down my trucks components and the donor's a good idea. We must keep in mind that I have no prior history with conversions.

Also what is the FE and FT?

You might as well put a diaper on me and warm a bottle.

SO in the meantime, we have nailed down 312, 292 as being direct converts. Also, how bout the 300 L6, I hear from different mechanics (the day mine blew) that this was a great dependable motor, and it can be somewhat hipo'ed. If I drop a 300 in it, what needs changing. I am inept enough to know that the manifold on the 300 is on the passenger's side of the truck, and the 223 is on the driver's side.

Also, it seems to me that finding an ole Ford 4x4 of the appropriate year would be tough to come by. It is my experience that these are not common as the 2W brother.

Keep them coming...I need all the help you can dish!

Geno
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2006 | 10:22 PM
  #7  
FordBoypete's Avatar
FordBoypete
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 1
From: East Central Florida
Look, problem is style of chassis you have isn't conducive to better types of engines built by FoMoCo after 1965 when they did away with the system of mounting your early chassis necessitates. . .ergo = change the chassis to make it accept what you really need/ want to have, as in; instead of another "Older Type Engine & Power Train.
The early style [57-64] chassis limits your "bolt in choices" considerably.

Bite the bullet, use a mount kit to put in an power train that improves your situation.
By using an aftermarket engine mount conversion set up you could put any engine you can find mount set up for, in your truck. It makes more sense to select what you need than to settle for whatever you get stuck with 'cause you have to use it. Even if you gotta pay a guy with a portable welder to come install mounts, IMHO it's worth it.

Older technology engines are nostalgic, and classic & all that, but new tech engines run better, last longer when cared for & maintained, and are more powerful & efficient than most older engines you can Bolt into your 63 FoMoCo Truck "OEM" style. It's a rogue to hook an AOD to a pre 65 Ford Engine that will fit in a 63 F Series.

Most 64 & earlier style engines were designed & appeared in the 1950s. the later engines began in 1965. . . .

FE 1st appeared in '58 as a 2V 332 CID V8 in Fairlane Body, thus Fairlane Engine or FE the larger FT engine appeared about the same time in larger trucks, school busses etc thus Ford Truck or FT Engine.
The FE went through a lot of changes, 332-352-360- 361(= U-Haul) 390, 401, 406, 407, 410, 427 & 428 CID and all are "FE" style engines, and not the most efficient.

FBp
 
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2006 | 10:11 AM
  #8  
Ringo Fonebone's Avatar
Ringo Fonebone
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 0
From: Southern Alberta
My vote? find and rebuild a Y block.
They are damn good motors, built like tanks.
Have a unique and very cool sound to them too.
Most guys build them back as 312's with the crank bearings taken down to the size of standard 292, so they can use the neoprene back bearing seal instead of the archaic rope seal that's the one available for 312's.
you can get some decent horses out of a Y too.

Many options available as far as trans adapters, Do a google search on John Mummert for more info.

This, from a guy who has Windsors in a '63 and a '64. If either of them had been left alone enough to stick a Y block in, I would have done it without hesitation.

One proviso, if I am not mistaken the front loop motor mount (behind the radiator) is a different length for a six than a V8, may require some modification.

Cant beat that Y block sound. Except with another unique sound, the one of a Flathead.
But thats another kettle of fish.
 

Last edited by Ringo Fonebone; Apr 2, 2006 at 10:17 AM.
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Apr 2, 2006 | 10:33 AM
  #9  
drof46's Avatar
drof46
Elder User
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 998
Likes: 2
From: Benton, AR
If you want to get some Ideas about difficulty and price of putting in a cross member that will accept a different engine I would suggest getting an issue of classic trucks magazine from wally world and requesting a free catalog from everyone in the mag that offers one. Some suppliers I've seen even offer a bolt in cross member so you wouldn't have to weld. They have the crossmembers for the new transmissions also. If you go with a chebby engine and trans don't post that on here though, lol. When you decide on a engine, trans combo you can ask these guys about any bell housing clearance issues or anything else on the install, they know their stuff.
 
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2006 | 10:39 PM
  #10  
Fomoko1's Avatar
Fomoko1
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 97,516
Likes: 1,998
From: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Ringo Fonebone
My vote? find and rebuild a Y block. Cant beat that Y block sound. Except with another unique sound, the one of a Flathead.
But thats another kettle of fish.
Excellent choice.
 
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 05:54 AM
  #11  
garbz2's Avatar
garbz2
Post Fiend
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 6,060
Likes: 7
From: Glendale Arizona
Little tid bit... A V8 will not bolt in to a six cylender truck as it does not have the additional front mount on the frame.

Six cyl equipped trucks 61 to 64 that mount a 223 or 262 have a hole in the front crossmember for the front mount.

Eight Cyl. trucks using a 292 have an additional bracket welded to the front crossmember to account for the V8s shorter legenth.

The FT front bracket will bolt on the the FE with custom spacers. The bell housings were avalible in bolth the F series to F800 the N series and the C series with a FT engine

Garbz
 
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 07:23 AM
  #12  
BobbyFord's Avatar
BobbyFord
Logistics Pro
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,919
Likes: 271
I've had a 390 in my '63 for 20+ years. I used an aftermarket engine crossmember ($75 at the time, if I remember) 60s passenger car mounts (2141, I think), trans crossmember out of a 68 Galaxie and a floor shifter out of a '69 Mustang.
 
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 03:52 PM
  #13  
Col Flashman's Avatar
Col Flashman
Postmaster
25 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,890
Likes: 9
From: La Verne, California
Originally Posted by 1963F100inNC
Hello,

I bought a 1963 F100, and am interested in which engines I can put in to replace the shot 223. I want to swap out engines, however, I am not into body cutting and welding, since I don't have the equipment.

So what will work? it has the 3 speed on the tree as well. I might need to rebuild or change it out as well. Are the any v-8's that will work well?

I am certainly new at this so any help would be appreciated.

Thanks

Geno

And IF YOU HAVE AN ENGINE FOR ME IN NORTH CAROLINA let me know. I want to drop it in and go...so no tuckered out motors.
What's the matter w/ going w/ the Venerable 223 I-6 again?
Great relyable engine, FPT in that correct RPM range for all your needs, Performance Parts can be easily found for it on e-Bay & else where, 25mpg Average on the Hwy.

The first 2 years of the 300 I-6 have the same mounts as your truck.
Just thought I'd throw that it for grins.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:58 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE