'95 Aerostar 4.0l driveability problem
So, replaced fuel filter (it had been a while) and pulled codes. Got a 114-ACT sensor out of self-test, and 118-ECT sensor circuit open. Replaced the ECT sensor, since the ACT was out of stock. After that I got a 114 and a 111. So far, so good, but it didn't solve the problem.
This morning, the van stumbled again until warm, then would "idle" at about 2500 rpm (just a guess) at lights. Blipping the throttle did no good, so I proceeded to work trying to minimize stops. Same behavior after work, so I did both KOEO and KOER this evening. Results below:
KOEO
121 TP sensor is out of self-test
111 Pass
KOER
114 ACT sensor is out of self-test
121 TP sensor is out of self-test
411 Cannot control RPM during KOER low RPM check
538 Insufficient RPM change during KOER dynamic response test
412 Cannot control RPM during KOER high RPM check
then 121, 411, and 538 again.
Again, the vehicle engine speed was very elevated during the test. What do I make of this, and what should I try next? I have my suspicions, but many have warned here about just replacing parts *****-nilly. So who'll step up to the challenge? Thanks in advance for your help.
Welcome truckbuilder to Aero forum,
from your codes, looks like your '95 is an OBDI ECU system with diag port on firewall...Ford changed mid year 95 to OBDII with diag port at bottom of dash plastic in front of steering column
the 121 TP sensor code is the first to correct, check and make sure electrical plug is connected-on top front of throttle body at least on 96 4L...check for damage to connectors and wiring then clean connectors with electrical spray or throttle body spray and retest...check for any binding between throttle and sensor movement....still 121 then time for new TP
you could go thru all the hoops of measuring TP resistance at wide open and closed position but they do wear out
same with next culprit ACT, check and clean electrical connectors, located on black air tube between air cleaner, MAF and throttle body
rerun OBD tests
disconnect batt. neg. lead for 10 minutes to clear ECU K.eep A.live M.emory after each sensor replacement so that ECU will relearn from default new op. parameters, OBDI takes 10 minutes or so of driving to relearn
how long since MAF serviced, either replaced or cleaned?
Also same question for IAC?
how many miles on O2 sensors?, slow delayed action contaminated old O2 sensor on it's last legs will not always show on OBDI code tests but will show in performance and fuel mileage
run cyl. balance test to get idea of condition of plugs and wires
has vehicle been ran thru deep water to cause corrosion to sensors and connectors, strange that several would fail at same time?
how long has CEL/MIL been on?
Last edited by 96_4wdr; Feb 23, 2006 at 01:21 AM.
My Aerostar was built in Aug. 1995 and has the OBDI port on the firewall.
I'll try the fixes you suggested for the 121 code. Strangely, drove it to work today and had no idle speed problem and no CEL. It did stumble as usual before warm-up. On the ACT, the local parts store said they had 3 different ACT's for this vehicle in the book and would need the old one to compare. Any way I can know what I have without disabling the van, since they have to order a new one?
To answer your questions, MAF and IAC never serviced to my knowledge,unless they would have been touched when my head gaskets were repaired 3 years ago. Don't have those records handy but I doubt it.
O2 sensor is original. Performance isn't bad, don't track fuel econ closely since its my in-town daily driver and rarely have it out of town. I tried to get cylinder balance test to initiate, but it didn't and was getting late so I'll need to try again. Good suggestion.
No deep water ever, certainly not in last 4-5 years. CEL has been on intermittently for several months, a few seconds at a time, during accels. Usually accompanied by noticeable pinging, but backing off the throttle would invariably make it go away. (Lest you think me negligent, I tried once to get it checked and the local dealer said they didn't have a scanner for something that old anymore. I should have come here and done what I'm doing now
but its apparent they didn't want to mess with it and I got too comfortable with the CEL since it didn't stay on. My bad.) Strangely, or perhaps not so strangely, it doesn't ping on accels anymore. Any of this help to point out a trouble spot? I have had friends mention the O2 sensor as well, for the reason you stated. I'm trying to run this down myself, out of aversion to having a shop do $100/hour diagnosis and parts repl. labor on a 10 year old van.
going to have to get the codes solved to get the engine running half way smooth enough to run the cyl balance test...
try cleaning MAF, throttle body throat and plate gap, and the IAC with throttle body cleaner....nothing stronger or will cause damage...search Aero forum for tips, instructions...Ford says IAC cannot be cleaned, some on forum have success
time for a new O2 sensor, every 80k to 100k miles per Ford and O2 manuf's
all this can easily be done by DIY'er.... lotso fun, satisfaction and saved $$$$ in wallet
Anyway, I also popped off the inlet air duct and cleaned the throttle throat and plate thoroughly. Pretty cruddy in there, and it seemed for a second as if the throttle plate stuck when I was trying to move it manually. (I won't be that lucky though.) Nice and shiny now though, and the plate moved smoothly. Also checked the TPS voltage at around 5V, couldn't do the sweep test on it tonight. TPS connector seemed OK.
Other things--noticed 2 small cracks in the accordian section of the clean air duct. Hopefully this is not a problem. And my radiator fan hub is partially cracked through. Another part to replace.
And I noticed a loose, apparently never-used harness end, just under the TPS, which looked just like the ECT sensor connector. It went into the main harness the TPS and ECT are plugged into, but appeared to have no purpose. It's female connector ports were pretty dirty, so it didn't look like it came off something, but what would it be intended for? Another vehicle or engine?
if throttle plate is cruddy, expect the same thing in the IAC and MAF
spray some TB cleaner on 2 small cracks in clean air tube, engine speeds up and smooths out=holes...time for new tube...heat and time take their toll
extra unused sensor plug was for optional digital display temp gauge
there is also a wiggle test for OBDI that really helps isolate failing connectors and wiring...both KOEO and KOER...listed on pg 6-4 of Haynes......i'm spoiled by OBDII computer scanner
the 4L OHV Ford is notorious for carbon build up in heads combustion chamber, top of pistons and ring pack...a Seafoam 1 hr hot soak and hard run clean the ring packs and a qt of water slowly injected in thru TB or plenum at 2k rpm on a hot engine make the heads/pistons sparkle and is completely safe...change oil after...will be black if not done for some time...
agree on cracked fan hub, don't want a propeller going thru the radiator, ruins an otherwise good day
saw an inboard prop come apart on a Herc 130 on takeoff one time...ruined the fatigues on several guys before it finished chopping up aluminum
moral=never lean over an engine while revving it and never set near the red line inside a Herc 130
Last edited by 96_4wdr; Feb 24, 2006 at 02:29 AM.
Trending Topics
Probably I'll get an oxygen sensor since they seem to have a finite life and I'm way over it. Are these hard to replace, ie break loose?
Left ignition on last night, so I had to jump start and warm up in garage this morning. Much less stumble on way to work, but we'll see tonight when I start it and drive off while cold.
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Tuesday night I got 111 and 116 from the KOEO and 538 from the KOER. The 116 points me back to the ECT I replaced--is it possible the new sensor is bad too? Not the first time for electrical parts, but... I'm also starting to suspect the harness for the ECT. And the 538 seems to be pretty consistent, does that indicate a fault in any specific part?
I've been busy all week but I hope to do the O2 sensor this weekend, unless I get shocks for my E150...there's always something.
You did not give the gas peddal enough of a push at the begining of the KOER, or you are having issues with the TPS.
I would disconect the battery for 20 minutes and see if the 116 code comes back again. If it does, than the new sensor is bad, or you replaced the wrong sensor (You might have replaced the temp gauge sensor.)
Anyway, the O2 process required pulling the battery cable, and after reconnect I did a KOEO and got 111 and 118 codes. Next morning I still had the cold stumble condition, and got a few short CEL's when warmed up, so after getting home that evening I ran the KOER--116 and 538 codes. Darn, that suggests 93nighthawk is right and the new ECT sensor, or wiring, is bad too. Is there any way to test the harness, and would that being damaged also give a 116? And I thought I floored the pedal, so how long do you have to hold it down to get rid of the 538?
Over the last two days, the cold stumble has diminished considerably, but it may be the higher ambient temps at startup (40-50 degrees F, not 20-30 like before). Would anyone expect the Seafoam in the tank to have such a dramatic effect? Or the O2 sensor?
If you think I need to be more aggressive during the KOER to initiate the goose test, that'll be the next thing I try, plus replacing the TPS. Any other suggestions?



