Notices
2004 - 2008 F150 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 Ford F150's with 5.4 V8, 4.6 V8 engine
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Who Uses Fuel Additives? What Brands If Any Works??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 1, 2006 | 09:19 PM
  #1  
Indiana-red4x4's Avatar
Indiana-red4x4
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Who Uses Fuel Additives? What Brands If Any Works??

I did a search on this with very little luck. I was wondering out of all of us on here who has used a gas additive. I have tried a couple of octane boosters, and could tell no difference. Anyone use one that they liked. You walk into a Autozone or Advance parts place and see a ton of these on the shelf. Most of them are name brand. I have very little knowledge of these products and would like to see if anyone has used one and maybe noticed a difference in gas mileage or something. I do use HEET products in the red bottle in the winter time just in case. Thanks in advance.
<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2006 | 12:00 PM
  #2  
stang3O2's Avatar
stang3O2
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
IMO...kinda like oil additives...THEY ARE JUNK! ON a higher mileage vehicle I might run a fuel injector cleaner every 5K or so, but most gasoline requires cleaning agents etc as far as I know. And I do when they temp drops well below freezing here in Indy...use a basic fuel line antifreeze, especially if it sits for awhile. As far as Octane booster...JUNK and may make your truck run worse and do damage. Our trucks are made to run great on 87oct. But again, just my thoughts!!!
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2006 | 12:25 PM
  #3  
CMOS's Avatar
CMOS
Laughing Gas
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 3
From: Magnolia, TX
Agreed.

The only additives I use on occasion is Ford Fuel Injection Cleaner. I pour in a bottle 2 or 3 times a year as a preventative. Other than that, it's my opinion that additives are just snake-oil.

CMOS
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2006 | 01:58 PM
  #4  
HawaiianStyle's Avatar
HawaiianStyle
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: Subz of the Windy City!
Unlike some I have tried the majority of additives and as they said (Junk, snake oil) I have to agree as well. I also tried to do that acetone mixture with the gas to see if I could squeeze more miles out of a tank and just can't seem to get the mixture right so after about a month of testing and logging I gave up. I have a friend that is a technician at the BMW dealership here and he said that the octane boosters and fuel cleaners is a waste of money because they all use the same product (ethanol & MTBE). they warn their customers to stay away from these additives because it does more harm then good.

The following was taken from the EPA testing on these products:

“On-Road Study of the Effects of Reformulated Gasoline on Motor Vehicle Fuel Economy in Southeastern Wisconsin " U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency conducted an on-road study of the fuel economy effects of RFG. The intent of the study was to respond to consumer concerns that RFG was responsible for large reductions in motor vehicle fuel economy much larger than the 2% to 3% reduction predicted by previous studies or by the
theoretical energy content of the fuel formulations. In this study, fuel economy was measured from a group of Milwaukee area vehicles representing various model years and fuel delivery systems, and using four types of gasolines, one conventional gasoline and three oxygenated RFGs (MTBE, ETBE, and ethanol). Eight vehicles were driven over a fixed, 100-mile route with urban, suburban and rural segments. Their fuel usage was
determined by weighing the fuel at the beginning and end of the route. The study utilized vehicles with highly variable technologies and included carbureted vehicles, port fuelinjected vehicles, and throttle body fuel-injected vehicles. The study vehicles included older and newer technology vehicles as well as a pickup truck in order to represent as large an array of on-road vehicles as possible.
In general, the results of this practical on-the-road study were consistent with the predictions (based on both laboratory and on-road studies, as well as the energy content of the fuels tested) that were set out in the RFG regulations. The average change in fuel economy when RFG was compared to conventional gasoline was a 2.8% reduction in miles per gallon when using RFG.
 

Last edited by HawaiianStyle; Feb 2, 2006 at 02:00 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2006 | 02:38 PM
  #5  
KevinM's Avatar
KevinM
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,479
Likes: 4
Well the last test I saw was that Techron was the only product that actualy produced some results. Fuels today contain MTBE's which produce a carbon byproduct,Techron was one product that kept the combustion deposits down.
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2006 | 05:04 PM
  #6  
superrangerman2002's Avatar
superrangerman2002
Logistics Pro
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,821
Likes: 19
From: South Dakota
About the only thing that is worthwhile in my book is Seafoam.

However, I don't add it into the tank or oil....I use it to decarbon the top end of the motor via the brake booster line.

Sure does a bang up job when used properly, and makes one heck of a mosquito fogger!
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Christof13T
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
4
Oct 12, 2013 06:33 PM
BJsCOOT2
General Diesel Discussion
3
Oct 31, 2012 08:51 PM
ToddShroats
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
25
Jul 15, 2012 11:19 AM
ctownson
6.4L Power Stroke Diesel
9
Nov 8, 2008 04:14 PM
t4kne
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
15
Apr 5, 2007 09:15 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:52 PM.