Notices
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 2003 - 2007 F250, F350 pickup and F350+ Cab Chassis, 2003 - 2005 Excursion and 2003 - 2009 van

Dr Performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 21, 2006 | 10:43 PM
  #16  
Vic_Ferrari's Avatar
Vic_Ferrari
Posting Guru
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
From: Lake Mary, FL
Originally Posted by King of the Road 04
hey vic, sorry my punctuation and grammar was incorrect so many times. Lets just say friday nite happened to be an extended happy hour.

And, no i have no experience in tuning and software writing, my knowledge of it is very limited. All i was trying to say i just think it is better (at least from a home computer point of view, and using windows i have had lots of experience with the software going buggy) to flash the computer and completely change the programming, instead of altering it downstream from the main control point.

If what i just said again makes no sense well so be it, i am wrong. Thats just my general understanding of these computer systems on vehicles and what not. Im always open to learn new things, i was just stating what i thought thats all, i am by no means a guru when it comes to this stuff.

But i can say thank god our trucks dont use some sort of windows operating system LOL.

And I am no against tuning whatsoever. Done responsibly it can do wonders for these trucks.
Products like superchips, sct and diablo do reflash the entire calibration bank, and (at least I can speak from experience with the SCMT product I tuned) has all of the proper changes made to fuel, injection timing, boost, torque reduction ,shift tables, scalars, etc...

The entire stock program is extracted and saved, and is replaced by the superchips program.
There really is not a more 'correct" way to do it.

An inline device is more of a "hack" because you are tricking the PCM and not changing any of the programming, which has its own set of issues.

However, some major companies who are doing this (inline devices) are aware of the limitations and have done their due diligence to minimize drivability issues.

Most major brand tuning products are safe, because these companies reputations are on the line when they release these products.

Sorry if I came across a little harsh, but everyone can get a little fired up when is comes to subjects they have experience in or are passionate about...

 

Last edited by Vic_Ferrari; Jan 21, 2006 at 10:45 PM.
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 12:42 AM
  #17  
posner's Avatar
posner
Junior User
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
I have an 05 F350 King Ranch DRW PSD. I have used the aforementioned Dr performance module, the edge, and currently the SCMT. The Dr performance module made the truck absolutely haul ***! I had to be careful not to break the tires loose. However, I did get a few High fuel pressure codes from time to time. They were reset with a few restarts of the engine, but they really bothered me. In addition, the shifting with this module was by far the worst of the three. In fact, the strange shifting is why I GAVE it away to a friend.


I then had the edge with attitude. THe truck had some zip for sure, but not comparable to the Dr performance module until level 4 or 5. My truck ran the hottest with this module. Shifts were mediocre at best. About 3 months ago I switched to the SCMT and that is what I currently use. SHifting is perfect and installation is a breeze, but power wise, I have been sorely disappointed comparing it to the Dr performance module. While the truck is improved over stock ( I always run in economy mode) it lacks zip unless you mash the pedal to the floor. That being said, my truck runs the coolest with the SCMT which I like since I tow frequently.

Fuel mileage was the best with the Dr performance module. I was getting a shade over 18mpg on the highway at 70-75(calculated). WIth the SCMT I have fallen to a shade BELOW 16mpg on the highway; in fact, for a while I was sure someone was siphoning fuel out of my tank. I never really cared for the Edge because it seemed to run so much hotter, so I GAVE that away after about a month.

So in summary, I would have never strayed from the Dr performance were it not for the Occasional Fuel pressure code(3 times in 3 months; it only occured when towing) and the poor shifting. My mileage was improved over stock by 1.2 mpg, the power was great, and temps while towing were no problem. The only reason I stay with the SCMT is because the shifting is perfect, the truck is slightly more fun to drive than stock, and the temps are never a problem. It is certainly not because of fuel mileage or because the truck is so quick.

Posner
 
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 07:44 AM
  #18  
Ruger01's Avatar
Ruger01
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Deer Park, Tx
I really appreceiate the replies and feed back on the tuners and in line modules. It looks like I will go with a tuner for now.
 
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 12:44 PM
  #19  
BassCat's Avatar
BassCat
Junior User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by posner
I have an 05 F350 King Ranch DRW PSD. I have used the aforementioned Dr performance module, the edge, and currently the SCMT. The Dr performance module made the truck absolutely haul ***! I had to be careful not to break the tires loose. However, I did get a few High fuel pressure codes from time to time. They were reset with a few restarts of the engine, but they really bothered me. In addition, the shifting with this module was by far the worst of the three. In fact, the strange shifting is why I GAVE it away to a friend.


I then had the edge with attitude. THe truck had some zip for sure, but not comparable to the Dr performance module until level 4 or 5. My truck ran the hottest with this module. Shifts were mediocre at best. About 3 months ago I switched to the SCMT and that is what I currently use. SHifting is perfect and installation is a breeze, but power wise, I have been sorely disappointed comparing it to the Dr performance module. While the truck is improved over stock ( I always run in economy mode) it lacks zip unless you mash the pedal to the floor. That being said, my truck runs the coolest with the SCMT which I like since I tow frequently.

Fuel mileage was the best with the Dr performance module. I was getting a shade over 18mpg on the highway at 70-75(calculated). WIth the SCMT I have fallen to a shade BELOW 16mpg on the highway; in fact, for a while I was sure someone was siphoning fuel out of my tank. I never really cared for the Edge because it seemed to run so much hotter, so I GAVE that away after about a month.

So in summary, I would have never strayed from the Dr performance were it not for the Occasional Fuel pressure code(3 times in 3 months; it only occured when towing) and the poor shifting. My mileage was improved over stock by 1.2 mpg, the power was great, and temps while towing were no problem. The only reason I stay with the SCMT is because the shifting is perfect, the truck is slightly more fun to drive than stock, and the temps are never a problem. It is certainly not because of fuel mileage or because the truck is so quick.

Posner
Your comments are interesting Posner thanks for the post. I would like to ask you?

1. What HP Dr. P. Module you were running?

2. What calibration procedure did you use for the transmission?

3. Why would you give away a 500.00 performance module that had a 1 year warranty on it. As stated, Dr. Performance stays 2000 psi below max fuel pressure. Seems to me like you might have given Billy a call and sent your module to him to look at it. Three high fuel pressure codes in three months?

What was the code?
 
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 12:48 PM
  #20  
BassCat's Avatar
BassCat
Junior User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Ruger01
I really appreceiate the replies and feed back on the tuners and in line modules. It looks like I will go with a tuner for now.
Before you make your mind up and take ole Vics opinion, you might read my response to him.
 
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 01:46 PM
  #21  
BassCat's Avatar
BassCat
Junior User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Vic_Ferrari
It is obvious you have a vested interest in the product you are defending.

Thats fine.

On Dr performances site, it says PCM flashes "circumvent" fuel delivery.
Actually, a PCM flash controls it directly and correctly.
The DR Performance product circumvents fuel delivery because it is an inline device.
Anything you "bolt on" circumvents the PCM.

In my opinion, the Dr Perf is not a quality product.
I am certainly allowed to have an opinion.

Why don't we call this one a truce right here, for the sake of the forum.
It is one thing to offer an objective technical comment whether we agree or disagree but to misquote the Dr. Performance web site tells me what your all about Vic. You stated that on Dr. Performances site they say, PCM flashes “circumvent” fuel delivery. Go read it again Vic. That is not what they say at all does it? What they say is after market electronics or “chips” “circumvent” FACTORY fuel delivery. Would it be safe to say you are a liar, or you just can’t read.

Yes, your tuner Vic along with the others you endorsed “circumvent” FACTORY fuel delivery just like the Dr. Performance ad says they do. I can type it again if you did not understand what you just read? How come you fingers could not type the word FACTORY. All the “inline” “circumvent” talk sounds good and important to a novice. You know what I mean, THEY THINK YOU KNOW WHAT YOUR TALKING ABOUT when your really BS them. Dr. P. does not “circumvent” FACTORY fuel delivery just like their ad says they don‘t. No over-fueling Vic like your tuners you spent 1000‘s of hours developing do. Hell, even a guy that’s got 1000’s of hours on a dyno writing program files for SC can learn something new every day.

Predator Power Modules is the company behind Dr. Performance Modules and your right I did research them very well and I defend the principle behind the product I spent my hard earned money on. Predator not to be confused with Diablo MarkDPP endorses has a truck that set a record in Ennis, Texas, at the O’Reilly Fall Nationals, best recorded elapse ¼ mile time of 8.72 seconds at 154.44 miles per hour. Vic, my point in this comment is I think even you would agree that’s a pretty damn good run for a company that has NO engineering skills as you have suggested.

Yes, you got pie on your face Vic. Allot of pie I might add cause you got a “Big Head”



 
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 02:15 PM
  #22  
BassCat's Avatar
BassCat
Junior User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Vic_Ferrari
What the heck are you talking about?
I rarely call anyone out like this, but you are simply not very bright.

Your logic is completely invalid (as is your punctuation, spelling and general attitude).

I could sit here and tell you all the time I (and some others here) have spent tuning vehicles the correct way, but it just isn't worth the time.

When you rewrite what you call 'computer logic", do you misspell all of your commands?

Unbelieveable.
Truly unbelieveable. LOL

There are values set within the stock program to control fueling, injector timing, boost, torque reduction, line pressure, shifting, open/closed loop control (which these stay in closed loop all the time if running correctly).
These values (and what I mentioned is just the tip of the iceberg) are set by a HUMAN, and this human was an OEM Ford calibrator primarily concerned with a producton vehicle, not max performance.

These values are in 32 bit full floating hex format.
When another human (who has a clue what they are doing and has some good software tools), changes these values properly and collectively, and follows through with thousands of dyno,street and towing hours, datalogging hours and hours of information from the PCM, analyzing it, fine tuning it, etc... you then have a properly tuned vehicle.

This I have done.
Have you?

I am not against inline tuning, I just feel flashing is more ideal for many reasons.
Banks and Edge have quality inline products, if inline products are your thing.

The beef I have with you is that you have no clue what you are talking about.

There is an old saying:

"Talk what you know"

Read it (I know its hard).
Study it.
Live by it.
The guy admits he has had a drink or two and you write something like this. You talk to this guy like he is an idiot and that you are GOD and then he comes back and apologizes to you. UNBELIEVABLE yes I said UNBELEVABLE I guess I have seen it all.

Oh, I thought I would helped you out Vic with your spelling. Much like your reading problems you have the words you need spelling help with are in bold. Data logging is two words and you might try a space between dyno and street. I think you have explained why your are no longer writing program files for SC.
 
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 04:01 PM
  #23  
BigF350's Avatar
BigF350
FTE Leadership Emeritus
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 18,787
Likes: 30
From: Melbourne, Aus
FTE Emeritus
C'mon guys...
 
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-3

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-4

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-6

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

Ford Super Duty: 5 Things Owners LOVE, 5 Things They LOATHE!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Every 2026 Ford Truck Engine RANKED from WORST to FIRST!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

The Best F-150 Deal of Every Trim Level (XL through Raptor)

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 11:12 PM
  #24  
posner's Avatar
posner
Junior User
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
I had the stage II module for the 04-06 PSD. I actually purchased it from a distributor in town that I ran into when I was having my Line-X bedliner done. After a lengthy discussion, he sold me on it. I also purchased the AFE intake system with proguard 7 filter from him. He explained that I needed nothing but to plug in the module. I was new to the programmer/module thing, so I took his word for it. I was delighted with the performance and he warned me that my truck might seem to run a little strange as the transmission "learned" how to deal with the new found power. I just started to feel that I might be causing damage to my new truck when the shifting was sloppy. As far as giving it away, I really didnt care enough to try to return it. I figured it had been a couple months and that was the way it was. So I gave it to a buddy who always seems to be down on $$. Good luck


POsner
 
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 08:28 AM
  #25  
PSD6litre40's Avatar
PSD6litre40
Posting Guru
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Since the SCMT is so wonderful how come it only makes a claimed HP of 99 and when Dyno tested it made only 87hp? Yea, guys thats wonderful engineering watch out Hypertech might just catch up with you guys and I think Hypertech is the biggest joke in the Diesel Performance business besides Pacific Performance where you might as well drain your oil out because its gonna blow either way. Hypertech = OVERPRICED, OVERRATED, LOW HORSEPOWER PRODUCING JUNK! I will admit the SCMT is a moderate tuner for the common man. But, please for goodness sake don;t come on here talking crap about it when 75% of the other Diesel Performance Companys just annialate it on the Dyno. As far as I am concerned there will be no other products put on my truck as far as electronics go but, SCT, Bully Dog, and Quadzilla. They are all quality products and you can get to the bottom of something when you call unlike SCMT all they do is give you the run around after you have had your tuner re-flashed 2-3 times on a known issue by them. They just tell me over the phone we are just not sure what to do. They didn't offer to replace my tuner just to reprogram it free of charge when they even knew something was wrong. Just my opinion and nothing personal Vic just calm down on the holy griel SCMT garbage.
 
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 09:02 AM
  #26  
Vic_Ferrari's Avatar
Vic_Ferrari
Posting Guru
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
From: Lake Mary, FL
Originally Posted by PSD6litre40
Since the SCMT is so wonderful how come it only makes a claimed HP of 99 and when Dyno tested it made only 87hp? Yea, guys thats wonderful engineering watch out Hypertech might just catch up with you guys and I think Hypertech is the biggest joke in the Diesel Performance business besides Pacific Performance where you might as well drain your oil out because its gonna blow either way. Hypertech = OVERPRICED, OVERRATED, LOW HORSEPOWER PRODUCING JUNK! I will admit the SCMT is a moderate tuner for the common man. But, please for goodness sake don;t come on here talking crap about it when 75% of the other Diesel Performance Companys just annialate it on the Dyno. As far as I am concerned there will be no other products put on my truck as far as electronics go but, SCT, Bully Dog, and Quadzilla. They are all quality products and you can get to the bottom of something when you call unlike SCMT all they do is give you the run around after you have had your tuner re-flashed 2-3 times on a known issue by them. They just tell me over the phone we are just not sure what to do. They didn't offer to replace my tuner just to reprogram it free of charge when they even knew something was wrong. Just my opinion and nothing personal Vic just calm down on the holy griel SCMT garbage.
Read my posts in the past couple months...you will see that I placed some new hope in Hypertech with their new product.

As for an advertised 99 HP making only 87.....anyone who tunes vehicles will tell you that trucks vary, and more importantly DYNO OPERATORS vary.
Stock calibrations vary...

Diesel HP numbers vary WILDLY by load, and no two dynos show the same load.

Have you ever been on the dyno with a diesel truck?

Have you seen the wild difference between inertia HP testing an load HP testing?

Some think I have this huge 'ego", but what I really have is a lot of experience in diesel tuning, and I've seen it all.....
I've seen one person hop on the dyno, make a 10 pulls and get the same HP, then watch another person get in the same vehicle, on the same day on the same dyno and make 10 back to back pulls which show an entirely different number.

When you look at the datalog, no two people mash the throttle exactly the same, at the same rpm, load, etc....so HP numbers will vary.

Also, most dynojets are incapable of creating any load, and load is required for the truck to make power. Spinning an inertia dynojet is nowhere near the type of load a vehicle sees on the street, and this is why an eddy-current inertia dyno is necessary to properly test diesel HP numbers.

On the personal attacks: I'm really not concerned about it.
I'm out of the tuning business, you can buy any product you choose and is has absolutely zero affect on me.

Very few attacked diesel tuning with the tenacity and passion I had, and while I made my own mistakes (any human does), my passion was to create the msot correct, controlled and complete test environment possible.

The shifting was painstakingly adjusted, dyno runs were made, trailers were pulled, people were given the trucks to drive for awhile with no preconceived notions so they could comment on shifting/power/drivability.

Power levels were changed hundreds of times to develop a curve that was safe, streetable, not too touchy at part throttle, and safe for the engine.

Nothing is perfect, but this was all done out of sheer passion, not a half-assed attempt at making just a peak HP number with littel regard for anything else.

Contrary to what some may believe, I'm not here to flex any "muscles", I just enjoy passing on information that could only be derived from many hours (years) of tuning and dyno testing.
 
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 09:25 AM
  #27  
PSD6litre40's Avatar
PSD6litre40
Posting Guru
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
So in other words no other Diesel product is safe to use?
 
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 09:29 AM
  #28  
PSD6litre40's Avatar
PSD6litre40
Posting Guru
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
I am not personally attacking you it just absurb to call companys such as Quadzilla, Edge, Dr. Performance, and Bully Dog(Plug in Modules) nothign but hacks. Just outrageous to be honest.......
 
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 10:18 AM
  #29  
Vic_Ferrari's Avatar
Vic_Ferrari
Posting Guru
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
From: Lake Mary, FL
Originally Posted by PSD6litre40
So in other words no other Diesel product is safe to use?
I didn't say that.

Once again, PLEASE do your homework in my posts before you jump on me.

I very recently have said that Superchips, SCT, Diablosport, Edge, and Banks all have products that I would consider "safe" and are all quality saleable products for different target audiences.

I also went on to say that it appears Hypertech has now caught up in the 6.0 tuning market...releasing new product with more power.

I have no problem with a little debate now and then, but please do not put words into my mouth.


I have clarified many, many times that is is possible to make safe power with an in-line module if its done correctly (aka: edge/banks).

I PREFER a tuner, because it allows total recalibration and transmission tuning, but this does not mean inline is crap.
Some people prefer an inline box...they are not as concerned about transmission shifting/torque reduction, but more about shifting power levels on the fly.

Some prefer a tuner instead.

This is why restaurants have chicken, steak and salmon on the menu...

Different people want different things.

Tune a vehicle and put 10 people in it, you will get some wildly different opinions.
 

Last edited by Vic_Ferrari; Jan 23, 2006 at 10:27 AM.
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 11:16 AM
  #30  
PSD6litre40's Avatar
PSD6litre40
Posting Guru
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
I prefer a quad box with some trans tuning. I will have a Quad with me at the Dyno Day in Cinicinatti March 4 I am gonna try stacking it with my Power Pup. I wish I knew someone with a space Xcal2 with a trans tune so I could try it out. But, money is kinda tight right now.
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:17 AM.

story-0
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-2
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-3
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-6
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
Ford Super Duty: 5 Things Owners LOVE, 5 Things They LOATHE!

Slideshow: Ranking the 5 things owners love about their Super Duty and 5 things they don't

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:36:49


VIEW MORE
story-8
Every 2026 Ford Truck Engine RANKED from WORST to FIRST!

Slideshow: Ranking all 12 Ford truck engines available in 2026.

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 13:32:20


VIEW MORE
story-9
The Best F-150 Deal of Every Trim Level (XL through Raptor)

Slideshow: The best Ford F-150 deal for every trim level (XL through Raptor)

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-21 15:59:01


VIEW MORE