Ford vs The Competition Technical discussion and comparison ONLY. Trolls will not be tolerated.

454 vs 460

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-27-2005, 03:45 PM
Dunkindonuts97's Avatar
Dunkindonuts97
Dunkindonuts97 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas Tx.
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question 454 vs 460

I am looking for a bigger engine (not only in size but in hp) like a 454 or 460 to swap out with my '83 302; a year that no company seems to want to make parts for . Right now I am leaning toward the 454 but that is mainly because I can get a great deal on one right now. But before I go out and get it I would like to know from you guys what engine has the most horsepower and torque and/or the best points about them.
 
  #2  
Old 08-27-2005, 04:38 PM
tkondro's Avatar
tkondro
tkondro is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
which years are you looking at? I believe the year will dictate the H.P. and torque.
 
  #3  
Old 08-27-2005, 06:40 PM
tmyers's Avatar
tmyers
tmyers is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Everett, Wa
Posts: 2,404
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
What type of vehicle are we taking about?
 
  #4  
Old 08-27-2005, 09:12 PM
302s&460srocks's Avatar
302s&460srocks
302s&460srocks is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlo, New Brunswick
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm pretty sure building your 302 (headers, intake manifold, carb... oversize pistons, stroker crank, aftermarket heads...) or swapping in a 351W with a few bolt-ons would be less trouble and less expensive than swapping in a big block especially a chebby one. If you want a big block get a 429 or 460 '71 or earlier (hehe) and a C6 or 4 speed.
 
  #5  
Old 08-28-2005, 03:05 PM
Dunkindonuts97's Avatar
Dunkindonuts97
Dunkindonuts97 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas Tx.
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not sure what year it is but the engine, I still have to talk to the guy who has it for sale but it is going into a '52 Ford pickup. And in regards to 302s&460srocks, when you do all that to a 302 the doesn't that lessen the life of the engine?
 
  #6  
Old 08-28-2005, 06:07 PM
85e150's Avatar
85e150
85e150 is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 31,870
Received 1,592 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Is this '52 an F1 or an F2?

An F1 isn't going to like the extra road hugging weight of a BB be it chev or ford.

And if you want the HP king, I think the BBC gets it there, with 4 bolt mains and the ability to spin harder than a comparably built 460. But that gets you back to the question of how well your '52 can handle the weight and power of a stock big block, let alone a built one.
 
  #7  
Old 08-28-2005, 09:45 PM
Dunkindonuts97's Avatar
Dunkindonuts97
Dunkindonuts97 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas Tx.
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 85e150six4mtod
Is this '52 an F1 or an F2?

An F1 isn't going to like the extra road hugging weight of a BB be it chev or ford.

And if you want the HP king, I think the BBC gets it there, with 4 bolt mains and the ability to spin harder than a comparably built 460. But that gets you back to the question of how well your '52 can handle the weight and power of a stock big block, let alone a built one.
It is an F1. Now what I have to do and I mean HAVE TO DO is put the nine inch rear end I have on the truck. Then I have to look at transmission and up-graded brakes. Would you have any advice as to what transmission to get?
 
  #8  
Old 08-28-2005, 10:40 PM
MBBFord's Avatar
MBBFord
MBBFord is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 8,542
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
If you like autos, I think the best one out there would be a C6. I like them they are real strong, and can handle the abuse of slamming threw gears.
 
  #9  
Old 08-28-2005, 11:16 PM
rusty70f100's Avatar
rusty70f100
rusty70f100 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Iowa
Posts: 8,600
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 85e150six4mtod
And if you want the HP king, I think the BBC gets it there, with 4 bolt mains and the ability to spin harder than a comparably built 460. But that gets you back to the question of how well your '52 can handle the weight and power of a stock big block, let alone a built one.
Sure, if you like thrown rods.
 
  #10  
Old 08-29-2005, 12:24 AM
85e150's Avatar
85e150
85e150 is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 31,870
Received 1,592 Likes on 1,297 Posts
I'm sure both motors will throw rods, it just that a 2 bolt 460 is going to have trouble before a 4 bolt main 454, dontchathink? And if you wants lots of HP you need lots of RPM's, as I recall.....

Anyway, a BB anything into an F1 is more like a rebuild the whole truck project, imo.
 
  #11  
Old 08-29-2005, 12:26 AM
NickFordMan's Avatar
NickFordMan
NickFordMan is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,221
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
This is disgusting. You would actually consider a 454 in your FORD truck????
The 460 has superior torque, and when built right, will have as much, or more HP then a comparable 454. Not to mention the 460 is a FORD engine. Keep it together man!!
 
  #12  
Old 08-29-2005, 01:38 AM
tmyers's Avatar
tmyers
tmyers is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Everett, Wa
Posts: 2,404
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 85e150six4mtod
I'm sure both motors will throw rods, it just that a 2 bolt 460 is going to have trouble before a 4 bolt main 454, dontchathink? And if you wants lots of HP you need lots of RPM's, as I recall.....

Anyway, a BB anything into an F1 is more like a rebuild the whole truck project, imo.
The reason the 454 has a 4 bolt main is because the block is weaker. In the last 2 big block shootouts the 460 took the honors. It's good for about 7k rpms and that is with the stock crank and 2 bolt mains.

Unless you are going to drag race the truck you don't need to turn 7K or more. A small stroked 460 will make 600+ hp, 700+lbs of torque and run on pump gas and do this before 7K rpms.
 
  #13  
Old 08-29-2005, 02:17 AM
Ramrod48's Avatar
Ramrod48
Ramrod48 is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the 302 with a lil work would be the prefect motor for the truck,, Al that horse power is great but what you going to do with it ???? Go to the store for a pack of smokes ??I mean were talking serious overkill here, Geesss what the new crate motor Ford has a 512 ???, Go for Broke !!!!!!!!!!!!!!{ I gotta admit I liked the FORD vs CHEBBY debate },, Every body knows those chebby's go fast then puke, While the Ford just stroke's along
 
  #14  
Old 08-29-2005, 02:50 AM
NickFordMan's Avatar
NickFordMan
NickFordMan is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,221
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well put tymers.
As of overkill...I don't think so, he's building a classic truck, and he wants it to be his own creation. The 460 will make the HP cheaper, and a lot lower in the RPM range. Along with MASSIVE amounts of torque, that the 302 would struggle to handle. Don't get me wrong, the 302 is an outstanding engine, and will handle as much power as the BB, but the BBF will do it cheaper, easier, and quicker.
 
  #15  
Old 08-29-2005, 05:58 PM
P51D Mustang's Avatar
P51D Mustang
P51D Mustang is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's interesting how many people view the BBC in these forums:

As being more durable at high rpm than a 460(the opossite is true).
As being the endurance racing king (really?).
As having more power potential, particularly at high rpm(not likely).
As in having four bolt mains caps decreases the potential to throw rods(a non-causal relationship).

I have been asked to consult on problems involved with a non-automotive high performance application using the BBC. The problems are manifold, from thrown rods, broken cranks, broken valve seats, broken cams, sucked valves, broken piston skirts and scored piston cylinders. They seem pre-disposed to detonation problems, although in this application the fuel octane exceeds 100 octane. That was on several engines with less than 50 hours of operation. The problems seem to be repeatable and not random. The few willing to try a Ford or Mopar alternative are no longer enccountering these problems so early or as ofton.

Several years ago I had friend with a older Chevy work truck. The 454 at 80,000 miles was shot so, he went through no less than three GM Performance BBC crate engines(not cheap) in the space two years before giving up.

Trust me, the 460 is a much better choice.
 


Quick Reply: 454 vs 460



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:44 PM.