Notices

Towing + MPG setups

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 24, 2005 | 12:22 AM
  #16  
Lead_Foot's Avatar
Lead_Foot
Thread Starter
|
More Turbo
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
I was under the impression the stock carb on these engines is crap, the 670 is only 20 cfm larger, ive been told that a good 600 cfm carb is better than the stock one.
 
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2005 | 02:39 AM
  #17  
Bear 45/70's Avatar
Bear 45/70
Post Fiend
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 8
From: Union, Washington
Actually it is 70 CFM larger. A stock carb is an Holley built emissions 600 CFM carb. Replacing it with a standard 600 improves things.
 
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2005 | 11:43 PM
  #18  
Big O Dave's Avatar
Big O Dave
Tuned
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 320
Likes: 1
Lot's of great info, here. Thanks especially to Brad Johnson for the detailed and well-thought out (and well-researched) cam suggestions.
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2005 | 08:57 PM
  #19  
kermmydog's Avatar
kermmydog
Post Fiend
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 9,176
Likes: 4
From: Western Central NV
As for gas mileage the 4180 600 CFM STOCK CARB, is alittle better on gas mileage, than a replacement 4160 600 CFM out of the box. One reason the 4180 has a 2 stage power valve and a few internal things that were for gas mileage.
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2005 | 09:18 PM
  #20  
Bear 45/70's Avatar
Bear 45/70
Post Fiend
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 8
From: Union, Washington
Just swap the dual stage power valve into the new carb. Then you will be ahead because with the 4160 or even a 4150 you has infinite idle mixture adjustment where on the 4180 you are extremely limited to a lean conition.
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 07:11 PM
  #21  
staysbroken's Avatar
staysbroken
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Temple, TX
Originally Posted by Brad Johnson
With the Crane 353931, DD predicts 366 HP @4500 and 480 lb-ft all the way from idle to 3500 RPM. The torque line on the graph is dead flat across that RPM range.

With the 353901, DD predicts 365 HP @4500 and 490 lb-ft torque from idle to 3500 RPM. Again, the torque line is dead flat.

With the 350901, DD predicts 338 HP @4000 RPM and 515 lb-ft at 2000 RPM. Unfortunately, the torque takes an immediate nose dive and is down to 450 lb-ft by 4000 RPM.
Just out of curiosity, how accurate are Desktop Dyno estimates usually? The only reason I ask is, the claims Edelbrock makes for their performer cam/intake package are nowhere near those numbers.

I've got a set of headers (1 3/4" I believe, not certain though), dual 2 1/4" exhaust, and a Holley 750 in the truck now. Could I realistically expect numbers like those by swapping in one of the cams you mentioned?

Thanks,
Richard
 
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2005 | 06:16 PM
  #22  
Brad Johnson's Avatar
Brad Johnson
Elder User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Just out of curiosity, how accurate are Desktop Dyno estimates usually? The only reason I ask is, the claims Edelbrock makes for their performer cam/intake package are nowhere near those numbers.

I've got a set of headers (1 3/4" I believe, not certain though), dual 2 1/4" exhaust, and a Holley 750 in the truck now. Could I realistically expect numbers like those by swapping in one of the cams you mentioned?

Only as accurate as the input info, especially head flow numbers. Given good info it usually comes within a few percent. However... remember that it's still a sim, and presumes sea-level altitude and a perfect tune. Also, it's crank HP. You have to deduct for driveline losses to get wheel HP.

Also remember that the sim for this thread presumes stock heads. The Edelbrock packages are usually quoted using their aftermarket heads (which aren't bad, by the way). The late 60's factory 429 and 460 specs hovered around 350-360 HP and 450-475 lb-ft torque. You should be able to at least duplicate that, and possibly improve on it, with some specific bolt-ons and careful tuning.

Brad
 
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2005 | 06:23 PM
  #23  
Lead_Foot's Avatar
Lead_Foot
Thread Starter
|
More Turbo
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Come to think of it they changed the heads a couple times in the eighties, this engine is older, and has D3VE heads, will this change things at all, or are the numbers still similar.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-3

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-5

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 05:08 PM
  #24  
ClydeSDale's Avatar
ClydeSDale
Laughing Gas
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 837
Likes: 2
From: Minnesota
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by kermmydog
I have an 86 F250 4x4 460 C-6 3:55 gears and I can get 9.5-11 MPG on a squeze empty and on the road. Towing our travel trailer about 7,000# I get 6-7 MPG.
Does that mileage ever sound familiar!! Differences being 4X2, professionally rebuilt 4180 carb and, with the exception of low restriction exhaust and recurved distributor, it's all stock. My old trailer ran ~7,000#. The new(er) one is closer to 9,000#; a little longer, a little higher but I really don't notice a difference in mileage so far.

I'm toying with the idea of changing over to 4.10's since most of my mileage is towing. If it wasn't such a hassle I'd like to try 3.73's first but might as well go all the way if I'm going to do it. I've even been told I might pick up a little mileage with the stouter gears because the engine wouldn't be working as hard to do the same job.

Brad Thanks for the input. You've laid out a plan I'd really like to follow when the $$$ are available ... provided we can afford to even drive these things in the future

Lead_Foot Interesting that you're thinking about getting out of 4.10's and I'm looking to go into them for the same reason ...

Roger

Clyde S Dale, my chestnut brown & tan 5th wheel workhorse is a
1984 F250HD XLT RCLB 4X2 8600 GVW
460 C6 3.55's
68,500 original miles (and counting)
 
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 05:12 PM
  #25  
Lead_Foot's Avatar
Lead_Foot
Thread Starter
|
More Turbo
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
I never mentioned a gear change, im happy with my gearing, if i go larger tires i'll go an even lower gear, probably 35's with 4.56 gears.

EDIT my gas mileage is better than i thought, although i still dont know what it is under normal conditions because my mom has been driving my truck for two months, but towing a 6k lb trailer, including stump pulling, and crawling up a few miles in 4L i got 9.5 MPG, im fairly happy with it the way it is.
 
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 06:00 PM
  #26  
ClydeSDale's Avatar
ClydeSDale
Laughing Gas
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 837
Likes: 2
From: Minnesota
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Lead_Foot
...keep it at as low RPM as possible, what is a good way to set this up ...
I stand corrected. It was Bear who mentioned the gear change as a way to lower the rpm.

Roger
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
swampthang
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
1
Feb 13, 2014 01:49 PM
donovan
Modular V10 (6.8l)
2
May 26, 2011 05:10 PM
44dwarf
Modular V10 (6.8l)
32
Jan 13, 2011 12:01 AM
ja2488
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
39
Jan 5, 2011 12:13 PM
sgreen
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
3
Jan 26, 2001 09:58 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:09 AM.

story-0
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-12 11:01:55


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-2
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-7
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE