Some '06 Chevy notes
Mountain Pass
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
When I was a heavy equipment operator running a D8R, D8N, and a Vermeer TG400 Tub Grinder that all used the CAT 3406, if it reached 205* all three of them would puke coolant. I find it hard to believe that that is normal and not getting hot. But on the other hand when I drove truck the W900 KW with a Detroit of some kind(430hp) would run 210-220* all day long with no problems.
Last edited by MofW; Jul 31, 2005 at 11:12 AM.
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
It is official: 360Hp and 650lb-in for Duramax: Here is info from GM.
http://www.media.gm.com/servlet/Gate...12&docid=16955
(You may need to copy link).
http://www.media.gm.com/servlet/Gate...12&docid=16955
(You may need to copy link).
Posting Guru
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,221
Likes: 5
This thing sounds like it's going to be a pig on fuel. I don't understand why companies are forced to reduce NVH so much. I love the sound. Infact, I see most 6.0L guys putting new exhaust on their trucks anyways, so that effectively kills the purpose in making a quiet diesel....Although 650 FT/LBS at 1600 RPM will be sweet. I'd like to see a chassis dyno of one of these things.
Drives me crazy wandering what Ford has up their sleeve, especially with this (according to Polar) GM 6.9L coming out at the same time. When does the contract that Chrysler and Cummins have end? I wander what this new Mercedes engine will be like as well.
Drives me crazy wandering what Ford has up their sleeve, especially with this (according to Polar) GM 6.9L coming out at the same time. When does the contract that Chrysler and Cummins have end? I wander what this new Mercedes engine will be like as well.
FTE Leadership Emeritus
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 18,787
Likes: 30
From: Melbourne, Aus
100% agree, MB will not build a Diesel that will be accepted by the US pickup public anytime (especially Dodge buyers).
I say that, because MB is (apparently) already building a 6.0l V12 Diesel with an expected 500hp, but it will have more technology on that engine than you can poke a stick at, which will not bode well with someone who wants a big rig engine in thier pickup.
Not to mention it will cost more to build the engine, than what they sell a base Cummins equipped Ram for...
I say that, because MB is (apparently) already building a 6.0l V12 Diesel with an expected 500hp, but it will have more technology on that engine than you can poke a stick at, which will not bode well with someone who wants a big rig engine in thier pickup.
Not to mention it will cost more to build the engine, than what they sell a base Cummins equipped Ram for...
Freshman User
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
I wonder if GM is still going to handicap the manual tranny Duramax with the 300hp 520tq rating?
That GM press release said the the "new Duramax 6600 .... will be available exclusively with the new Allison 1000 6 speed...."
Also the 310 hp motor will be made thru the 3rd Qtr. With the new 360 Hp LBZ Duramax replacing it in the 4th Qtr of 2005.
This is in reference to the Silverado HD and Sierra HD
That GM press release said the the "new Duramax 6600 .... will be available exclusively with the new Allison 1000 6 speed...."
Also the 310 hp motor will be made thru the 3rd Qtr. With the new 360 Hp LBZ Duramax replacing it in the 4th Qtr of 2005.
This is in reference to the Silverado HD and Sierra HD
Posting Guru
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by milan
It is official: 360Hp and 650lb-in for Duramax: Here is info from GM.
http://www.media.gm.com/servlet/GatewayServlet?target=http://image.emerald.gm.com/gmnews/viewpressreldetail.do?domain=12&docid=16955
(You may need to copy link).
http://www.media.gm.com/servlet/GatewayServlet?target=http://image.emerald.gm.com/gmnews/viewpressreldetail.do?domain=12&docid=16955
(You may need to copy link).
Thread Starter
|
Post Fiend
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,728
Likes: 1
From: Damascus-Boring, Ore
Originally Posted by Lordabbett1
I wonder if GM is still going to handicap the manual tranny Duramax with the 300hp 520tq rating?
That GM press release said the the "new Duramax 6600 .... will be available exclusively with the new Allison 1000 6 speed...."
Also the 310 hp motor will be made thru the 3rd Qtr. With the new 360 Hp LBZ Duramax replacing it in the 4th Qtr of 2005.
This is in reference to the Silverado HD and Sierra HD
That GM press release said the the "new Duramax 6600 .... will be available exclusively with the new Allison 1000 6 speed...."
Also the 310 hp motor will be made thru the 3rd Qtr. With the new 360 Hp LBZ Duramax replacing it in the 4th Qtr of 2005.
This is in reference to the Silverado HD and Sierra HD
FTE Stories
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership
Brett Foote
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches
Pouria Savadkouei
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained
Brett Foote
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love
Joe Kucinski
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)
Michael S. Palmer
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer
Joe Kucinski
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)
Brett Foote
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies
Joe Kucinski
FTE Leadership Emeritus
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 18,787
Likes: 30
From: Melbourne, Aus
Originally Posted by polarbear
Don't forget the possibility that they may not even offer a manual with a D-Max. In the land of Chebbie, manual transmissions are an absolute non-starter, even in the Kodiak line. I think it's been over two years since I've actually, physically seen one.
Thier lack of concentration on developing a good combo with the manual, or the fact that the other transmission option is an Allison?
I know 95% of all F-Series sold here are PSD's, and of that, 85% come equipped with the ZF...
Elder User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 761
Likes: 0
That's because "down under" they still realise that even for all it's improvements, the automatic transmission is still a very delicate piece of machinery in it's own right. Don't get me wrong here, I believe the autos have come a long way, they can pull hard, are simple to use, and are much more durable than they used to be in truck applications. Still, durability is a relative term, and when you consider the overall complexity of an auto to begin with, the improvements aren't really saying much.
With a manual transmission truck, it's the engine itself which offers the most complexity of any component built into the truck - the transmission is just a simple gear box used to multiply torque at varying speeds. With an auto, you have literally a complete sub system to worry of - and one which is actually more complex than the engine itself.
I guess in Australia they follow the KIS principle- Keep It Simple ( no bothering with KISS - the last "S" which stands for "stupid", serves no descriptive purpose other than to add unneeded complexity)
With a manual transmission truck, it's the engine itself which offers the most complexity of any component built into the truck - the transmission is just a simple gear box used to multiply torque at varying speeds. With an auto, you have literally a complete sub system to worry of - and one which is actually more complex than the engine itself.
I guess in Australia they follow the KIS principle- Keep It Simple ( no bothering with KISS - the last "S" which stands for "stupid", serves no descriptive purpose other than to add unneeded complexity)
Cargo Master
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,898
Likes: 185
Originally Posted by sinister73
That's because "down under" they still realise that even for all it's improvements, the automatic transmission is still a very delicate piece of machinery in it's own right. Don't get me wrong here, I believe the autos have come a long way, they can pull hard, are simple to use, and are much more durable than they used to be in truck applications. Still, durability is a relative term, and when you consider the overall complexity of an auto to begin with, the improvements aren't really saying
Most concrete mixer trucks have automatics and I don't classify a concrete mixer truck or its auto transmission as being "delicate".
Thread Starter
|
Post Fiend
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,728
Likes: 1
From: Damascus-Boring, Ore
I'm going to guess that in Australia they're used more for commercial purposes. Also, the 7.3/4-spd Auto combination is still offered (no Torqueshift). Oddly, in the Cab-Chassis models, I see the 6-speed is standard, but in the 250 Supercab/Crew Cab Pickup models, the Automatic becomes standard.
FTE Leadership Emeritus
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 18,787
Likes: 30
From: Melbourne, Aus
I'm going to guess that in Australia they're used more for commercial purposes.
Yes that would be correct, but would it be correct to say that the Chevy is not really used (often) for commercial purposes?
Yes that would be correct, but would it be correct to say that the Chevy is not really used (often) for commercial purposes?