When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Someone here provided a link to a website (http://www.bgsoflex.com/auto.html) that provides automotive calculations - Playing with those numbers easily shows why our mileage is so poor.
For instance, the big mirrors I like take 3 horses to push at 70 MPH, the entire truck takes 119 horses at 70 just due to aerodynamics.
Push that up to 80 MPH and the aerodynamic loss jumps to 178 horses - which any farm boy knows is a lot of horses to feed.
Weight is a whole lot less important - a 5000 pound truck only needs 19 horses to overcome rolling resistance at 70.
The moral of the story is that if you want good gas mileage out of our trucks you had better be prepared to do a lot of chopping and channeling.
wow that is very cool but i do average more than the calculator says. i get about 13 to 16 on highway and 9 to 11 in town unloaded with 3.00 rear gear and 428
All the math shows is that a 13% increase in speed requires 33% more power - at 70 MPH. Is a good argument for running 70 instead of 80 - but not much fun in that.
Guys, Let us not forget we are in 2005 looking back 40 years. Trucks didn't have radios much less stereos, gas was $0.25 a gallon, and no one that I knew used their truck for anything but work. My father would not drive his truck to church, unless there was a work day and he had to haul something in or away.
We used the our trucks like our tractors, for work only.
WillyB, thanks for the reply about Bowling & Grippo, I built their Injector Pulser,
that thing has saved me about a grand on injectors. I have cleaned and balance checked friends injectors also as with Rovers as they are a PITA and dealers want $189 per injector.
.....=o&o>.....
Carl, I knew there was a reason I liked you - what do you think of their megaSquart vs a stock ford controler? I am looking to use an EFI engine out of a 87 Ford pickup.
Considering the FACT there are so many variables regarding fuel economy it would be hard to get a specific answer.
Things to consider:
1)Quality of Fuel
2)Additives
3)Tune & Efficiency of Engine
4)Altitude
5)Driving technique
6)Topography where you are driving
7)How much city/how much highway driving
8)Gear ratio & size of tires
9)Weight of the vehicle
10)Tire inflation
11)Vehicle design (drag)
12)Clean air filter
Just to name a few.
I drive a 78 pickup with a well tuned 429 engine,at an altitude of 3400 ft above sea level,with normal weight on the truck with a canopy,tires inflated to spec,using premium fuel,2.75 rear,C6 Trans, With my foot on the pedal like there was a egg under it, in Canada in a city that the downtown is located in a valley.
WillyB, the only injection vehicles I have are the Rover's MPI system and a Delorean with MPI. What I like so far for a future build (482" FE) is Force MPI throttle body on my own welded injector bung intake controlled by a Mega-Squirt 2 system. Besides that i'm not too familar with Ford's or other MPI systems. Sorry to disappoint. At this time and budget the Holley must due.
.....=o&o>.....
The Megasquirt system is pretty good, I am going to be using that to control a multi-port system on the 390 in my 72. It's nice because it's tunable, and their software is easy to use.
Ford_Six, can you keep us posted on your progress? What intake and location of injector bungs? Photos? Will you have Mega-Squirt control timing or retain the dizzy? Thanks.
.....=o&o>.....
I'm using a stock 352 4BBL intake, and I will be drilling it right at the base of the valve cover mount. I am using a 460 throttle body and inlet neck, and a DUI distributor. Should be a pretty good setup, no more choke worries!
FordSix, is the megaSquart II out yet? Do you have one in your hands? Seems like we have been waiting for a long time for them to release it to production.
So you'll keep the dizzy which can be matched to your truck / motor gear ratio combo but tune for fuel. Sounds simple and alot cheaper than a Force MPI system, they quoted me $3,800. I got cold feet real fast and installed a 670 SA as the 1850 had over 800,000 miles. The Mega-Squirt II which will come out around August this year will have a lap top timing curve. Price?
Did you buy or machine your own injector bungs? What intake are you going to use?
.....=o&o>.....
FordSix, is the megaSquart II out yet? Do you have one in your hands? Seems like we have been waiting for a long time for them to release it to production.
Yep, it has taken a while for us to release MS-II plug-in module. There were a lot of small delays which all added up. But we have the final PCBs coming back from the fab house and they will be sent to the contract manufacturer for assembly. So in about 3 weeks or so we will have a nice stock of MS-II for release. This version, in addition to fuel and spark, has a CAN controller for easy add-on hardware (e.g. I/O and sequential FI/spark router boards) all in the works.
Also I have finished up final torture testing of the new MegaSquirt mainboard (known as the V3 board) and it will also be released in about 3 weeks. Monitor the www.msefi.com site for release info, and info on MSII is at http://www.megasquirt.info/ms2/
Sir, that is good news, and straight from the founder's mouth.
There are several people on this board who want to add EFI to their FE engine (including me), but are held back because of the questions and expense of adding the injectors to the intake. Perhaps now with the electronics available someone will offer a mechanical kit.
As it is, I spent less on a good running EFI 300 six with a good C6 than it was going to cost me to have the injecters and fuel rail added to the intake of my 390.
This is welcome news indeed!
Clint Wilcox
For FTE Members - While Mr. Bowling is more GM orientated, he is one of the founders of Mega-Squirt which is a viable replacement for the ECU on any EFI system. If you are considering EFI you owe it to yourself to look over the Mega-Squirt website. Not only can you save major bucks, but the code is available should you want to modify the way the system works.
The links he posted did not work for me, but cutting and pasting them did.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.