Notices
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series All Ford Ranger and Mazda B-Series models

Miss at startup

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 27, 2005 | 12:45 PM
  #16  
pawpaw's Avatar
pawpaw
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,851
Likes: 111
From: SW Va
Club FTE Gold Member
Fastow, have you had the computer scanned for trouble codes????

If not, why not run this puppy by your favorite autoparts store for a scan, most will do it at no charge, then post ALL the codes found. Maybe it'll sniff out a good clue to follow up on!!!!
 
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 01:38 AM
  #17  
fastow's Avatar
fastow
New User
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Yes pawpaw i did have a friend run it on his snap on scanner and it past every test and it did no trouble codes. We sprayed carb cleaner through the air intake as while it was running and unhooked the battery to try and reset the computer. thought maybe at first we had something but after driving it, it still is rough when started cold and it sometimes will stumble when running down the highway it s like someone shut the switch off and on .
 
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 07:07 AM
  #18  
pawpaw's Avatar
pawpaw
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,851
Likes: 111
From: SW Va
Club FTE Gold Member
Well if the fuel pressure reading you posted is accurate, it's more than double what it's supposed to be, according to my Haynes manual, which lists the pressure range as... KOEO (Key On Engine Off) 35 - 45 psi.

At idle with the fuel pressure regulator vaccum hose CONNECTED, pressure should be 25 - 35 psi. Or about 10 lbs lower than the KOEO reading, but between the 25-35 lb reading.

At idle, with the fuel pressure regulator's vacuum hose DISCONNECTED, pressure should be 35 - 45 psi. Or it should RISE to about the KOEO number with no regulation.

If you don't get the psi RISE by disconnecting the fuel pressure regulators vacuum line, replace the regulator.

Needless to say, if the fuel pressure is really as high as the numbers you've posted, you have a fuel pressure regulator problem IMHO!!!

I'm surprised your friends SnapOn scan tool didn't spot the excessive fuel pressre, it should have, if your readngs are real.

Recheck your pressue readings, as I've listed above & confirm they are high & if so, double check your vacuum lines to the regulator for leaks, if they are ok, then replace the regulator & be shure to test the new one & let us know how things go.
 
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 10:54 AM
  #19  
Rockledge's Avatar
Rockledge
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,748
Likes: 16
From: Connecticut
Originally Posted by pawpaw
Well if the fuel pressure reading you posted is accurate, it's more than double what it's supposed to be, according to my Haynes manual, which lists the pressure range as... KOEO (Key On Engine Off) 35 - 45 psi.

At idle with the fuel pressure regulator vaccum hose CONNECTED, pressure should be 25 - 35 psi. Or about 10 lbs lower than the KOEO reading, but between the 25-35 lb reading.

At idle, with the fuel pressure regulator's vacuum hose DISCONNECTED, pressure should be 35 - 45 psi. Or it should RISE to about the KOEO number with no regulation.

If you don't get the psi RISE by disconnecting the fuel pressure regulators vacuum line, replace the regulator.

Needless to say, if the fuel pressure is really as high as the numbers you've posted, you have a fuel pressure regulator problem IMHO!!!

I'm surprised your friends SnapOn scan tool didn't spot the excessive fuel pressre, it should have, if your readngs are real.

Recheck your pressue readings, as I've listed above & confirm they are high & if so, double check your vacuum lines to the regulator for leaks, if they are ok, then replace the regulator & be shure to test the new one & let us know how things go.
That's good advice pawpaw. I agree that the fuel pressure on fastow's Ranger is way out of line and that the fuel system needs to be looked over carefully.

However, keep in mind that the '98 Ranger is equipped with a "returnless" fuel system which is a little bit different than the standard Ford fuel system used up thru '97 (on Ranger's anyway). In the "returnless" system, there is no return fuel line from the fuel rail back to the tank, and the fuel pressure regulator is actually inside the tank along with the pump assembly. The fuel pressure specs are also different, since the system operates under a higher pressure. Take a look:

1998 Ranger

- All gasoline engines (except 3.0L FFV): KOEO/KOER = 64±8 psi

- 3.0L FFV: KOEO/KOER =55±8 psi

In any event, it's still evident from the above that the numbers fastow posted aren't even in the ballpark.
 
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 12:52 PM
  #20  
pawpaw's Avatar
pawpaw
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,851
Likes: 111
From: SW Va
Club FTE Gold Member
Good point Rockledge, thanks for straightening me out on that, somehow my foggy mind thought we were talkig about a 94, 4cyl, doublechecking it, I see it's a 98, 4cyl!!!! Dang pitiful when my mind can't remeber something long enough to turn a page!!!! LOL

You know, the build sheet on my 99 4.0L says it has a feedback fuel system!!!! Was something different on 98's?????
 
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2005 | 10:13 AM
  #21  
98 POS's Avatar
98 POS
New User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
I'm having the exact same problem. Plugs, wires, and the fuel filter are new. Could it be the camshaft position sensor
 
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2005 | 08:13 PM
  #22  
MazdaRangerGuy's Avatar
MazdaRangerGuy
Elder User
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
If it is the OVERHEAD CAM engine (It will say SOHC on the cover) then it's likely to be the intake gaskets. Fairly easy to replace.. no coolant travels through the plastic intake... just don't tighten the bolts too much your you'll crack it. You might even have a "extended warranty" on it, (a "recall" campaign extends it to i believe 10 years/150k miles). If yours isn't covered I would purchase the recall kit from ford.. comes with all the gaskets and a new chain tensioner (easy to replace once intake is off), as it's cheaper than just getting the gaskets. The gaskets (look like rubber bands) get brittle and leak when cold... and the mildest increase in temperature allows them to seal up again, hence the rough cold starting.

If you have the non overhead cam engine, then this does not apply.

Another possibility is coolant leaking into the combustion chamber due to a leaking head or intake gasket. Have you had to add any antifreeze? Sometimes they leak so little it doesn't show any symptoms, but while sitting a couple droplets make their way into the cylinders, causing it to run rough until it burns out.. (a couple seconds or so)...

Just a couple ideas to consider...
 
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2005 | 09:36 PM
  #23  
fastow's Avatar
fastow
New User
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Sorry its been awhile gettin back on here. This truck of mine is still being a problem after installing the fuel pump , disconnecting the battery to reset the computer and running carb cleaner through the ait intake while it was running it seems maybe a little better but still there is times when it still idles rough and will fall on its face out on the highway. Something I thought about is on the fuel rail where the fuel line connects looks to be some type of regulator with a vacuum hose hooked to it I havn't checked it out but just wondered if it could be bad or the vacuum line somewhat plugged. Some other food for thought is when i had the fuel pump out there was some type of valve in the line between the pump and where the line hooks to come out of the tank It had a return line on it while I had the pump out I took this out A mechanic at the parts store said that it was not used with a after market fuel pump. In the directions for the new pump there was no mention of this piece and nothing even pictured in the instructions. I'll keep everyone posted and thanks for the reply's and info.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Sep 2, 2005 | 02:29 AM
  #24  
irishguyincc's Avatar
irishguyincc
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: South Texas
That thing on the fuel rail with the vacuum hose on it is your fuel pressure regulator. I had one go bad a few years ago and my truck did exactly what you are describing, so check it. Someone posted a way to check it above using a fuel pressure gauge on the system. Another low tech way to test it is to pull the vacuum line off it just after running it. If there is any fuel in that vacuum tube then the regulator is bad. Good luck.
 
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2005 | 04:35 AM
  #25  
Rockledge's Avatar
Rockledge
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,748
Likes: 16
From: Connecticut
Originally Posted by irishguyincc
That thing on the fuel rail with the vacuum hose on it is your fuel pressure regulator. I had one go bad a few years ago and my truck did exactly what you are describing, so check it. Someone posted a way to check it above using a fuel pressure gauge on the system. Another low tech way to test it is to pull the vacuum line off it just after running it. If there is any fuel in that vacuum tube then the regulator is bad. Good luck.
Good advice, but it's not applicable to '98+ Rangers, which have a returnless fuel system.

In a returnless fuel system, the pressure regulator is in the tank. The little thingy on the fuel supply manifold with a hose coming off of it looks very much like a FPR, but it's not. It's actually a fuel pulse damper which purportedly reduces fuel injection "noise". The vacuum port coming off the damper is connected to manifold vacuum so as to avoid fuel spillage in the event the damper’s diaphragm were to rupture.

fastow, I can't help but think back to what you said about the fuel pump replacement repair job you did. It sounds to me that you might have changed some things around (you said you removed a fuel line with a valve that was in the tank) that probably shouldn't have been.
 
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2005 | 09:55 AM
  #26  
98 POS's Avatar
98 POS
New User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
My 98 explorer 4.0 sohc idles rough when I start it up and hesitates getting on the freeway in the morning. I've replaced the #4 spark plug 3 times in the last year. the wires, coil, fuel filter, and vacuum leaks have all been eliminated as possible causes. my mechanic thinks it's a blown head gasket, but there is no coolant in the oil and it doesn't overheat. If it is a blown head gasket, what are the cons of just replacing the spark plug instead of repairing the blown head gasket?
 
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2005 | 05:36 PM
  #27  
irishguyincc's Avatar
irishguyincc
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: South Texas
That's good to know, thanks for the correction and info Rockledge.
 
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2005 | 06:02 PM
  #28  
Rockledge's Avatar
Rockledge
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,748
Likes: 16
From: Connecticut
Originally Posted by irishguyincc
That's good to know, thanks for the correction and info Rockledge.
Your quite welcome. Just passing along what I myself was forced to learn on account of my '98.

FYI, the reason Ford (and others) are going with the Returnless Fuel Systems has to do mostly with emissions. Getting rid of the return line is one more tweak in the never-ending quest toward lower evaporative hydrocarbons. The less fuel lines and fuel travel distance, the less chance for hydrocarbons to get into the atmosphere.

Another benefit is that, only the fuel that actually gets used makes its way up through the fuel supply line(s) to the injectors; the excess (or bypass) flow doesn't have nearly as far to go and average fuel flow rate is thereby reduced, saving wear and tear on the pump. This is so even though most returnless systems operate at a higher pressure (as is the case with my '98, for example). The higher pressure helps with vaporization issues, especially during warm starts.

 
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 12:13 AM
  #29  
fastow's Avatar
fastow
New User
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
HUM Rockledge sounds like your up on this stuff. So what your saying is the thingy I removed in the fuel tank I sould not have done I thought when doin it maybe it could have been the fpr but like i said a mechanic said and in the instructions to the fuel pump there wa no mention of it. I think the mechanic and parts place thought the thing in the tank was the fuel pulse damper your theory seems more right. That said tonite when I was at the parts store I ask if they listed a fuel pressure regulator they did for like 40 bucks and the pic looked just like the one on my fuel rail. Some one also mentioned maybe the feul pressure was regulated with voltage supplied to the pump via the computer.I just hate keep throwing parts at this thing but i guess if i was paying a garage to do it they might be following the same path and costing me even more.
 
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2005 | 09:38 PM
  #30  
fastow's Avatar
fastow
New User
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
went to the parts store tonite was going to get the fpr that they had listed for the 1998 after a closer look it was not the same deal had him look up fpr for a 99 they don't list one. they just list a complete pump assembly with the float and in the pic the regulator thingy on it for like $269.00 I think i am off to the savage yard.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:19 PM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE