late 70's to mid 90's 351w same?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-23-2005, 08:39 PM
ncl's Avatar
ncl
ncl is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Green Springs, OH
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
late 70's to mid 90's 351w same?

My question is are the late 70's 351w the same as the fuel injected late 80's to mid 90's 351w. I would like to know this because I plan on swapping out my 351m for the late model fuel injected engine and then converting it to MAF. I would also like to run the old style waterpump with V-belt system rather than serpentine setup. I just think this would be easier for the powersteering hook up. Also need to know this for the flywheel. I plan on keeping the c6 but I think the flywheel is the same on the 351w and 351m. Not sure if that flywheel will work on the newer engine. Accordin to the ford racing website the 289, 302,351w,c,m. all use the 164 tooth 28 oz flywheel are the 88-93 351w use the same flywheel? My vehicle is a 1977 f150 4x4 351m/400 and c6 tranny. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
  #2  
Old 05-24-2005, 10:31 AM
Kemicalburns's Avatar
Kemicalburns
Kemicalburns is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bend,OR
Posts: 14,265
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
the 351m and 351w are to different motors so nothing between the 2 are interchangable.

the c6 was mated to many 351w's so getting the right flexplate shouldnt be a problem. best bet would be to find a complete 351w from 93 and older at a wrecking yard. check out www.fordfuelinjection.com for a mass air kit at a great price.
i would keep the serp setup.
 
  #3  
Old 05-24-2005, 10:36 AM
ronclark's Avatar
ronclark
ronclark is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Fleming Ga
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
351w 289 and 302 up to 81 uses 28 oz flywheel with the number of teeth dependent on the trans used.81 and up 302 uses 50 oz flywheel. Not sure about the 351m and 400 but I think they are internally balanced engines.

If you have a 351m then the c-6 is the large bell housing bolt pattern and will not bolt up to a 351w and the flywheel will not work. You need a small bell housing c-6 or if you can get the complete setup for the fuel injected 351then swap whatever trans is in the fuel injection truck.
 
  #4  
Old 05-24-2005, 01:58 PM
RTM's Avatar
RTM
RTM is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunny Florida
Posts: 2,659
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
It will be harder to find a small block 4X4 C6 trans but you can take a 2 wheel drive small block C6 and take your big block C6 and switch the guts over. You have to do this because the output shaft is different on a 4x4 from a 4x2 trans.
 
  #5  
Old 05-24-2005, 08:35 PM
ncl's Avatar
ncl
ncl is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Green Springs, OH
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Hey guys thanks for the info you think advanced adapters carries an adapter for the AOD or E40d depending which would be in the truck to adapt to my np205 I would really like to keep it in the truck I looked on their website but didnt see any info on them. Has anyone done this combination?
 
  #6  
Old 05-24-2005, 08:44 PM
RTM's Avatar
RTM
RTM is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunny Florida
Posts: 2,659
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
The E40D was offered behind 460's if I am not mistaken but it will need a computer to shift it correctly. A while back I think I had run across an after market computer that would run the E40D trans in a non computer car/truck. I have no clue where i read this at but at one point I was thinking of installing an E40D in my 78 bronco to get a OD gear. I now have a ZF which I will install instead.
 
  #7  
Old 05-25-2005, 08:49 AM
Kemicalburns's Avatar
Kemicalburns
Kemicalburns is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bend,OR
Posts: 14,265
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
either stick with the c6 or go manual ZF 5speed tranny. dont bother with the e4od or Aod. they are good trannys but for your application and the setup involved probably isnt worth it.
 
  #8  
Old 05-25-2005, 11:17 AM
loudfords's Avatar
loudfords
loudfords is offline
FTE Chapter Leader

Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Beachville, Ontario
Posts: 3,828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ncl
late model fuel injected engine and then converting it to MAF. I would also like to run the old style waterpump with V-belt system rather than serpentine setup. I just think this would be easier for the powersteering hook up.
Just use a v-belt timing cover & water pump and accessory mounts to do this, no problems there. The serpentine PS pump should be able to connect to your PS setup with no problems if you choose to go that route, the PS pump didn't change much over the years, just mounting and pulleys.
 
  #9  
Old 05-25-2005, 11:22 AM
Kemicalburns's Avatar
Kemicalburns
Kemicalburns is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bend,OR
Posts: 14,265
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
he will need some sort of fuelpump block off plate if he uses that type of timing cover
 
  #10  
Old 06-13-2005, 08:38 PM
ncl's Avatar
ncl
ncl is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Green Springs, OH
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I would like to keep the c6 but I want to have overdrive. And my c6 wont bolt up to the 351w or I guess I could swap in a efi 460 then I would be set but then the gas mileage would work out to be the same as I have now. It is one big dilemma sooner or later I am going to have to get a new truck or modernize what I have.What kind of mileage do you think I would get if I kept my current setup but just add a gear vendor od unit. Current highway 8-10 mpg. I turn about 2600rpm at 60mph.

current setup

351m bored .030 w/400 crank
high energy 260h cam
36" tires
4.11 gears
c6 tranny
 
  #11  
Old 09-28-2012, 02:44 PM
chamblizi's Avatar
chamblizi
chamblizi is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Des Moines, WA
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Kemicalburns
the 351m and 351w are to different motors so nothing between the 2 are interchangable.

the c6 was mated to many 351w's so getting the right flexplate shouldnt be a problem. best bet would be to find a complete 351w from 93 and older at a wrecking yard. check out www.fordfuelinjection.com for a mass air kit at a great price.
i would keep the serp setup.
In regards to your response.... there is a buddy of mine that gave me a idea for my ranchero... which is to put a 89 351w in my ranchero.... i am down for this idea because i know the windsor from 89 puts down a beautiful wopping 250hp stock.

Will the 90's windsor bolt up to my 75 c6? the 13 mpg is well worth it in the long run..... that kinda hp can put me in the line against fast acceleration cars...
 
  #12  
Old 09-28-2012, 09:39 PM
willowbilly3's Avatar
willowbilly3
willowbilly3 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Black Hills of SD
Posts: 8,209
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
I've owned 2 EFI 351 4x4s automatics, one of them I bought new. They both got horrible mileage.
 
  #13  
Old 09-29-2012, 01:42 PM
chamblizi's Avatar
chamblizi
chamblizi is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Des Moines, WA
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by willowbilly3
I've owned 2 EFI 351 4x4s automatics, one of them I bought new. They both got horrible mileage.
with a 1975 ranchero and having 250hp under the hood by adding a new 351w why would you need to care about mpg.... searching for a 351m/400 is not worth the time in a swap... if i am going out might as well go for broke.
 
  #14  
Old 09-30-2012, 11:46 AM
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
baddad457 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: May 2003
Location: south louisiana
Posts: 11,122
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by ronclark
351w 289 and 302 up to 81 uses 28 oz flywheel with the number of teeth dependent on the trans used.81 and up 302 uses 50 oz flywheel. Not sure about the 351m and 400 but I think they are internally balanced engines.
WRONG!! The 351W's never went to the 50 oz flywheel(or flexplate) They kept the 28oz throughout their production run. Which is also the same imbalance used on the 351M/400.
 
  #15  
Old 09-30-2012, 11:53 AM
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
baddad457 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: May 2003
Location: south louisiana
Posts: 11,122
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by chamblizi
In regards to your response.... there is a buddy of mine that gave me a idea for my ranchero... which is to put a 89 351w in my ranchero.... i am down for this idea because i know the windsor from 89 puts down a beautiful wopping 250hp stock.

Will the 90's windsor bolt up to my 75 c6? the 13 mpg is well worth it in the long run..... that kinda hp can put me in the line against fast acceleration cars...
Depends on which 351 your Ranchero came with. If it's a 351M, then no, you'll need a small block C6. The 351M/400 used the same bell pattern as the 429/460 (with the exception of a very few 400's, which used the small block pattern) If you're going to swap to a 351W, then get one out of a 95-97 truck, these came with roller cams, same cam used in the 96-2001 Explorer/Mountaineer, which is just a tad less cam than the HO roller.
 


Quick Reply: late 70's to mid 90's 351w same?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:41 PM.