Notices

302 Block ID Confirmation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 11, 2005 | 04:27 PM
  #1  
PierceEye's Avatar
PierceEye
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Tampa Florida
302 Block ID Confirmation

I have a 302 with a block ID of E6SE

THe Other numbers near that are
BA
A Large "S" with 17 above to the right f the "S"

Then on the tab at the back it has 8A21

From what I can tell this is a HO 302 and yes it is a roller block.

A am I correct in saying this is out of an 86 Mustang, T-Bird etc?

It has flat top pistons and I wanted to put a mild cam in as this motor is going into a 79 F-150 that will be carburated with an Eldebrock Performer manifold and carb.

I will be using the reverse water pump and timing chain cover off the newer motor as the indent is for the fuel pump is there I just need to cut it out.
I will also switch over the serpintine belt system and the block is going in for rebuil next week and it will be bored .30 over.

Anyone that can let me know if I am on the right track here?
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2005 | 08:08 PM
  #2  
garsten's Avatar
garsten
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ
the e6se means the part was originally designed in 1986. the second e is for engine parts and s is for thunderbird, the car line for which the engine was originally designed. if the 8A21 is cast into the block, that is the date the engine was cast. january 21, 1988. if it is stamped, that is the date the engine was built. your block more than likely came out of an 88 model year car or truck. if the pistons are truely flat with no dish or valve relief notches, your engine came out of something other than an ho mustang, but you are correct, it is an ho roller block. cheers, garsten
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2005 | 07:34 AM
  #3  
PierceEye's Avatar
PierceEye
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Tampa Florida
Originally Posted by garsten
the e6se means the part was originally designed in 1986. the second e is for engine parts and s is for thunderbird, the car line for which the engine was originally designed. if the 8A21 is cast into the block, that is the date the engine was cast. january 21, 1988. if it is stamped, that is the date the engine was built. your block more than likely came out of an 88 model year car or truck. if the pistons are truely flat with no dish or valve relief notches, your engine came out of something other than an ho mustang, but you are correct, it is an ho roller block. cheers, garsten

There is a slight amount of the pistons that is resessed maybe 1/32nd with the outer part being maybe 1/2" at the most. would this still be consifered a flat top? There are no valve releases as I do have a 79 truck motor and they have the valve relief's but I want to use the HO motor in the truck.

Thanks,
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2005 | 10:56 AM
  #4  
garsten's Avatar
garsten
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ
i wouldn't be too concerned about what vehicle your engine came from. you say the block needs to be bored so you are going to be buying new pistons sooner or later. piston choice will depend on compression ratio desired, cam choice, cylinder heads and valve diameter. the fact that you have a roller block allows you to use a roller camshaft and roller lifters for improved performance and many many aftermarket choices. if you are going to use the 79 cylinder heads, they will be a major obstacle to any performance gains, followed closely by your exhaust system. cheers, garsten
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2005 | 11:03 AM
  #5  
PierceEye's Avatar
PierceEye
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Tampa Florida
Originally Posted by garsten
i wouldn't be too concerned about what vehicle your engine came from. you say the block needs to be bored so you are going to be buying new pistons sooner or later. piston choice will depend on compression ratio desired, cam choice, cylinder heads and valve diameter. the fact that you have a roller block allows you to use a roller camshaft and roller lifters for improved performance and many many aftermarket choices. if you are going to use the 79 cylinder heads, they will be a major obstacle to any performance gains, followed closely by your exhaust system. cheers, garsten

Garten,

Thanks for all you insight.
I have another set of heads that have been rebuilt I bought of a guy who needed some $. They are the Heart Shaped chambers with new valves, seats, guides etc. I was yold that those heads are great if I mod the chamber a bit by grinding off the center part of the chamber if you understand that:-)

If I used flat top pistons with those heads how much bigger of a cam do you think I can get away with?

I already have a new set of Hooker headers I bought off the same guy the had the heads. I gave him 200 bucks for all. The headers will fit a 79 150.

What else?


Thanks Again!

Roger
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2005 | 04:12 PM
  #6  
garsten's Avatar
garsten
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ
I AM NOT A CAM GURU SO READ THIS WITH SOME SPECULATION!!

cam selection depends on lots of stuff...here are some general guideline for a street truck with good idle and a low enough power band to get you moving. power should start around 1000-1500 rpms. keep the duration around 220 degrees @ 0.05". lobe seperation no less than 110 degrees (comp cams has a bunch of cams @ 110 degrees). some people say no less than 112 degrees and that's what i would use, but i know a lot of people like the comp cams and probably for good reasons. i have never used one so i would not know. if the heads have the stock valves and have not had a lot of metal milled off, and the pistons are for a 5.0L ho, you SHOULD??? be able to run around .530 lift. when you increase lift and duration, you really need to check piston to valve clearance before head installation. it's not that difficult and pays peace of mind.

look at the ford racing 303 series of cams for some more ideas as to lift and duration of waht they sell. with the exception of the Z303 cam, i believe all the rest SHOULD??? drop in without a problem.

i've pushed the envelope with larger intake valves, too much lift and stock pistons and almost destroyed pistons and valve train by trying to slide buy with thick copper head gaskets. intake valves barely touched the pistons but did no damage. i did have to pull the engine and have the pistons flycut for proper clearance and the cylinder heads torn apart and checked for bent valves. a costly mistake everyone should avoid.

increased lift also means you need the right valve springs to open and close valves at the proper rate. too much spring pressure may damage your cam and too little spring pressure will not close the valves fast enough and the pistons may help them along. if the springs are near stock, stick with a cam near stock. most cam mfgs offer their cams in a kit with springs, lifters and everything else for this very reason.

check out cam mfgs web sites. they list recommended usage for a specific cam grind. ask your machinists or local engine builders for advice. cheers, garsten
 

Last edited by garsten; May 12, 2005 at 04:18 PM.
Reply
Old May 12, 2005 | 07:39 PM
  #7  
robnrob10's Avatar
robnrob10
Freshman User
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
keep your stock cam. or get a truck roller cam for your block which will require the roller lifters, dog bones and db hold down in order to work.

those heads sound like 86 heads, which are garbage, don't even waste your money on them.

if you want power get an aftermarket aluminum head with a small intake port to help low end torque. i've head gt40 irons (l303) gt40x, holley heads, windsor srs and afr 165's. best of the bunch would be the 165's.

don't nickel and dime yourself to death with garbage parts. e7 is a good head for a tight budget, can get them for50 bucks or free.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rusty_S
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
5
Jan 10, 2015 08:41 PM
rodriguezfords
1957 - 1960 F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
Oct 26, 2012 04:59 PM
Bad92Nite302
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
16
Mar 24, 2008 09:59 PM
occupant
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
8
Jan 19, 2007 05:18 PM
durk
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
3
Jun 21, 2005 02:00 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:25 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE