Notices

Differences in 302 engines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 16, 2007 | 01:15 PM
  #1  
occupant's Avatar
occupant
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
From: Westerville, OH
Differences in 302 engines

OK. I've searched the last ten pages of posts for 302 engine information and here's what I have so far...

1968 was the first year for the 302 engine. It was introduced in mid-1969 in F-series trucks. 1970 Boss 302's are a real animal. 1974 was the last year for the heavy blocks. 1986 was the last year for carbureted 302's. 1982 was the year they switched from a 50-ounce balancer to a 28-ounce one. 302's share bellhousings with 221, 260, 289, and 351W engines and will work with most transmissions out there but not the C6's with big-block (M or FE) bellhousings.

What I want to know is about pulleys and accessories. I'm looking at a 1967 model truck. I don't know the original engine but it had a 289 at one point which was swapped for a carbureted 302. So I'm down to 68-86. The seller says he thinks early 80s, so we'll say 80-86. This tells me the engine probably has EGR, cast iron manifolds, and probably came out of an LTD, pickup, or van. So we'll go with that.

The pulleys don't line up. I'm hoping that can be fixed. Is there a way to adjust pulleys in and out? Would it be simpler to install a serpentine pulley kit in the truck? Are there serpentine belt kits available that allow me to continue to use a clutch fan or flex fan setup or will I be forced to install an electric fan of some kind?

Truck runs, just not for long since the water pump and alternator won't line up. I wonder if the water pump is off a different motor? What would cause the pulleys to not line up, maybe this thing was cobbled together from several different engines and there are some wrong parts on it? I don't mind starting from scratch if I have to.
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2007 | 09:31 AM
  #2  
Huntersbo's Avatar
Huntersbo
Elder User
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
From: So. California
I have a 1968 302 and I thought that it was the first year but a friend told me he had a 1967 302 in his 1967 Bronco. So I suppose that mabe in late 1966 Ford started putting 302s in some vehicles of model year 1967. I would check with casting numbers.
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2007 | 06:53 PM
  #3  
ken75ranger's Avatar
ken75ranger
Elder User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
From: Troy,NY
Since you don't mind starting from scratch I'd find a junker 5.0 car or truck with a serpentine setup and swap everything from the front cover out. Just check for clearance around the steering box and distance to the radiator. Explorer 5.0 are usually the shortest but you would need the front cover too. They have a special front cover. Vans and mustangs are pretty short too.
I picked up a whole motor with the front accessories on ebay for $60.
Serpentine is a good upgrade and it works the motor easier than v-belts do.
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2007 | 09:06 PM
  #4  
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 11,141
Likes: 25
From: south louisiana
I don't think it's an 80's 302. If it was, you'd have a severe shake as the engine would be unbalanced. First you need to determine what year engine it is. Then figure what balancer is on it now and if it's correct for the engine. In 1970, Ford went from 3 bolt (pulley) balancers to 4 bolt. Generally you cannot mix up front accessory parts (brackets, waterpumps and timing covers) To get a trouble free install, all the front parts need to be from the same application. Going serpentine also has risks. Some are std rotation (waterpumps) some are reverse rotation and these use both style timing covers, depending on the year. At some point after the serpentine setup came out (1979 was the 1st year) Ford switched the port layout for the waterpump on the reverse rotation. The mid 80's to 91 Fullsize Ford/Merc/Lincolns use a std rotation W/P with a two belt serpentine system.
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2007 | 09:08 PM
  #5  
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 11,141
Likes: 25
From: south louisiana
Also one other thing you posted about the bellhousing interchange, the 221,260 and early 289's have a smaller 5 bolt bellhousing that does not fit 302 blocks. The late 289, 302, 255 (early 80's abortion), 351 (W & C) and a handfull of 400's, all share the same bellhousing pattern.
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2007 | 09:42 PM
  #6  
Trav460's Avatar
Trav460
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver
why not just use a couple washers to space out the water pump pulley and altenater? how badly are they off alignment? i had a old chevy years back and had the same problem.. played with a couple washers.. longer bolts.. untill the belt stopped smoking and whineing.. just a thought
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 10:39 AM
  #7  
occupant's Avatar
occupant
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
From: Westerville, OH
Originally Posted by Trav460
why not just use a couple washers to space out the water pump pulley and altenater? how badly are they off alignment? i had a old chevy years back and had the same problem.. played with a couple washers.. longer bolts.. untill the belt stopped smoking and whineing.. just a thought
Ooh...I like this idea.

I did this before in 2002 with a hood latch on a wrecked '93 Tempo coupe that I bought on eBay for just over $200. The previous owner had replaced all the necessary body parts but didn't pull the core support straight nor did he change the hood latch. So I drove it with a bungee cord holding the hood shut for 210 miles to get it to my parent's house. Then I went to ACE hardware and bought some longer bolts, nuts, washers, and some cool little metal tubes (can't remember what they're called) which put enough space between the core support and the hood latch to allow it to catch the hood. Adjusted it just right and until you opened the hood you couldn't tell, it fit perfectly. Only way to know anything had been done to it at ALL from the outside was that the front bumper cover and hood were gray and the car was green. Sold it before I had a chance to pull those two parts and have them painted to match.

That will get me by with it until I can find an appropriate serpentine setup with a clutch fan and all. That and I need to find out what year motor and if it's reverse or not. I might not have the truck until the first week of February, depends on whether or not it's still for sale then. But everything I've heard about it sounds good.

I'll definitely make a trip to ACE and grab some washers and such. Will have to see how far off everything is. Seller tells me the accessories are all on there, they just don't line up so there are no belts on it. So hopefully I can make them line up one way or another, or just start over fresh.

Another poster mentioned reverse rotation, I bet this motor has that and THAT'S why the belts won't stay on. I'll know for sure when I get it home and I'll update this thread either way.
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 10:40 AM
  #8  
occupant's Avatar
occupant
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
From: Westerville, OH
Originally Posted by Huntersbo
I have a 1968 302 and I thought that it was the first year but a friend told me he had a 1967 302 in his 1967 Bronco. So I suppose that mabe in late 1966 Ford started putting 302s in some vehicles of model year 1967. I would check with casting numbers.
Yeah, they had 302's in other vehicles but didn't put them in the trucks until 1969 I guess. Looked at a 1967 brochure online and the only V8 available that year was a 352 Y-block.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 05:18 PM
  #9  
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 11,141
Likes: 25
From: south louisiana
Reverse rotation pumps use a smooth waterpump pulley as the back side of the belt runs it. The belt wraps around the crank & W/P pulley in an "S" fashion. The applications I know to be reverse rotation are all Mustang/Capri from 79-95, Pickups and vans from sometime in the mid 80's-97, the Explorer/Mountaineer 5.0 and the Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 from 87-91.
 

Last edited by baddad457; Jan 19, 2007 at 05:20 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Boss50
Big Block V8 - 385 Series (6.1/370, 7.0/429, 7.5/460)
4
Sep 28, 2016 04:05 PM
BigRobK
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
19
Dec 9, 2015 05:44 AM
51dueller
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
8
Dec 30, 2014 09:02 PM
GreatNorthWoods
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
14
Apr 30, 2010 06:25 AM
Cowboy_billythekid
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
9
Jun 16, 2002 09:56 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:38 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE