Notices
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Bumpsides Ford Truck

Need to install motor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 05:45 AM
  #1  
moparnut's Avatar
moparnut
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Need to install motor

Ive got a 67 2 wheel drive,F 100 shortbed.The body is done and painted and would like to install a 87 302 out of a lincoln.The motor has a throttle body injection.What motor mounts would be used?The tranny is a older C6 out of a station wagon that had a 289.I could also use the overdrive tranny out of the lincoln.If anyone has any info it would be appreciated. moparnut
 
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 08:52 AM
  #2  
hawkrod's Avatar
hawkrod
Laughing Gas
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 869
Likes: 1
From: Apple Valley CA USA
Sounds like a fun swap. First off, you can use motor towers and mounts from a 1970-1979 2 wheel drive with a 302. They will work fine and are not too hard to find. The next thing is the trans. A 289 station wagon never came with a C6 so you should look into what you have before you consider using it. Personally I think the AOD would be a better choice and would be easier because your late model engine has a different balance from an early engine so an early C6 flywheel will not fit your engine so you would have to find a flywheel with the correct balance for your late engine (and I think the AOD one is too small). Hawkrod
 
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 09:33 AM
  #3  
Freightrain's Avatar
Freightrain
Lead Driver
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,893
Likes: 12
From: Ohio
Club FTE Silver Member

What year wagon had the 289?? Must be mid 60's(Like a galaxie ).

Like Hawkrod mentioned, the motor mounts are pretty easy to come by. Depending on if the truck was a small block before you may need to change the frame perches also. Again, not a hard thing to do. It will all bolt in really easy from there.

If you use the OD tranny from lincoln, you'll have the cable for it(hopefully). Those early AOD had a cable to control shift points, so if you have all the proper parts, it should be an easy bolt in. The tranny mount is not a deal either. The crossmember is easy to adjust and re-drill frame(been there). Did you plan on keeping the electronics or switch to carb?

Like mentioned, the balance on these motors are different from early small blocks so you have to watch what flywheel you use. I'd keep it all lincoln. You could put some decent gear out back, but have easy cruisin' with OD.
 

Last edited by Freightrain; Mar 4, 2005 at 09:35 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 01:45 PM
  #4  
jstandle's Avatar
jstandle
Elder User
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 620
Likes: 8
From: USA
If you're a real mopar nut you should drop in a 440/727 into your '67 then you'd have a real runner. 4bbl, hemi grind cam, 2500 rpm stall, headers, and watch out!!

Jordan
 
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 02:10 PM
  #5  
Freightrain's Avatar
Freightrain
Lead Driver
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,893
Likes: 12
From: Ohio
Club FTE Silver Member

Jordan........put down the wrenches and step away from the truck..........LOL!!

Come on....A Mopar in a Ford!!! Geez, don't even think that...........
Gunno have to send you over to the street rod guys with their Cheby powered Ford rods
 
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 05:27 PM
  #6  
moparnut's Avatar
moparnut
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Thanks for all the replies,Been worried about this for awhile.Hate to get started on something and find out you have to change.Hawkrod ,I see what your saying.Those few tips will save me alot of running around.Freighttrain ,I have the cable intact with the tranny so that should work out fine.The pad on the motor said 67,and was told by the oldtimer it was a wagon.Jstandle,the reasonfor the moparnut handle.My other toy is a 69 charger 383 HP 335 horse factory,4spd,the motor will have to stay in that.They didnt make many 4spd chargers. Looks like the lincoln drive line will be the way to go.Now can anyone give any advice on getting rid of the front drums and converting to disc.Ive converted a few cars over in the past.I would even rather go with manual disc if the swap would be easier.finger is getting tired will check back.moparnut Ive got a few things extra for a 67.If I can help anyone out let me know.Right now a pair of front fenders,not perfect but descent.
 
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2005 | 04:57 AM
  #7  
jowilker's Avatar
jowilker
Fleet Owner
25 Year Member
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 24,552
Likes: 74
From: Creedmoor, North Carolina
Club FTE Silver Member

Try using the search feature. There are hundreds of threads on ps conversion on this board.

John
 
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2005 | 06:45 AM
  #8  
moparnut's Avatar
moparnut
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
jowilker,Copied the conversion for my application (cool).Ive found out more here in two days than I could of in 6 months of asking around.Thanks alot Im off to the junk yard to find some parts. moparnut
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 06:44 AM
  #9  
jowilker's Avatar
jowilker
Fleet Owner
25 Year Member
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 24,552
Likes: 74
From: Creedmoor, North Carolina
Club FTE Silver Member

Save some money buy a donor truck, sell parts that you don't need and maybe like me your upgrade parts can be had for -0- cost.

John
 
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:19 PM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE