When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Champ, I had my front 2 rotors resurfaced about 3 weeks ago because of grooving, which was covered under warranty (Milage was about 10K). No hassle from my dealer. I'm not sure if pads are under warranty but I know the rotors should be. Hope this helps
It is my opinion that no one should have worn out brakes before 50,000 to 60,000 miles. The reason they are wearing out is because they are being overused. Try coasting to a stop rather than coming to a screeching stop. The rear brakes should last to about 100,000 miles.
50k to 60k on brakes? Maybe if you were driving a Ranger that weighed 1/2 of the 150. The rears for 100K. Not likely on a vehicle with a tow pack. Ford has more rear bias on the brakes on vehicles with the tow pack to help improve braking while towing a trailer.
I agree that coasting to a stop will improve the life of the brakes, but 50-60 on the fronts and 100 on the rear is not realistic in my opinion. I have found that on the newer Fords I have had (98-150, 01-150, 03-Expedition, 03-250) that the fronts and rears wear pretty close to the same.
Thanks for the replies. I had the pads all replaced and the rotors resurfaced at the dealer. The brakes were pretty worn out. Only had about 2-mm left on them. I was at about 27k in mileage. Came out to $450.00. They said that becuase I did not have any of the vibration issues they were not going to replace the rotors under waranty.
50k to 60k on brakes? Maybe if you were driving a Ranger that weighed 1/2 of the 150. The rears for 100K. Not likely on a vehicle with a tow pack. Ford has more rear bias on the brakes on vehicles with the tow pack to help improve braking while towing a trailer.
I agree that coasting to a stop will improve the life of the brakes, but 50-60 on the fronts and 100 on the rear is not realistic in my opinion. I have found that on the newer Fords I have had (98-150, 01-150, 03-Expedition, 03-250) that the fronts and rears wear pretty close to the same.
Just my opinion and observations
50K to 60K would be conservative. I'll bet I can get 75K -100K out of a set of brake pads. The answer is not to lean on the brakes and let it coast to a stop. Anticipate the stops and it'll extend both the brakes and fuel mileage. I see people all the time speed up and then have to brake sharply to stop. That eats up brake pads and rotors. I replaced the pads on my '96 Ranger SC 4x4 at 60,000 miles and it could easily have gotten to 80-90K with no difficulty.
True Missouri Mule, I have never replaced brakes on anything that I was the exclusive driver on with the exeption of an 81 Vette, but that was because of the bad calipers they came with.
However, my wife, who is very careful, can go through a set of brakes in 30-40K on about anything she drives. She brakes a little too late, almost every time.
So advice on how to brake only works if you are the only person driving it...
Chris
some one mentioned new harder rotors, are these being put on newer f-150s or is this an after production fix. BTW I'm glad to have a vehicle with cheap brake issues. My BMW needs new brakes all around and I was quoted $1000. Thank god for domestic trucks.