Chrysler 300C vs...
#46
I iagree the terms musclecar and ponycar were from the 60s but the cars that first fit that description were from the 50s (and many were better performers). The 50 Mercury was the most chopped and customized vehicle of the era and there was as reason. The 53-56 Olds 88 was the hot rod of that era and won a bunch of NASCAR races when they were still stock cars. The Studebaker Silver Hawks, Golden Hawks and Gran Turismos (with supercharger) were the first pony cars and performed much better than the Mustang and Camaros of the 60s. The 55-57 Bel-Air coupes were the most sought out cars of their day (and still are to collectors). The 58 Bel-air got oversized but it was the first with a 348 and 3 deuces.
#47
nobody seems to argue with the fact that Dodge has a history of overhyped junk that has no resale value and will go away within a very few years.
300c might be exciting now, but I don't see anyone getting rid of their camrys and accords to buy one. Dodge is the main reason most people went that direction. Kcar anyone?
300c might be exciting now, but I don't see anyone getting rid of their camrys and accords to buy one. Dodge is the main reason most people went that direction. Kcar anyone?
#48
Originally Posted by 73Fastbackv10
1.) The Crown Vic has the governments highest safety rating in every category, so the 300C doesn't protect it better. It's probably worst due to the likelyhood of having it stolen.
2.) I don't smoke anything and I'll only ask you one time to never insinuate that again.
3.) I never said that the 300C was a fad.
4.) Like Tmyers said, it was the GTO that ushered in the musclecar era when John DeLorean put a larger engine (389) into the tempest body in 1964 without the consent of GM.
2.) I don't smoke anything and I'll only ask you one time to never insinuate that again.
3.) I never said that the 300C was a fad.
4.) Like Tmyers said, it was the GTO that ushered in the musclecar era when John DeLorean put a larger engine (389) into the tempest body in 1964 without the consent of GM.
#50
#51
I'll bet on the Crown Vic...The cops here bought a whole fleet of new Intrepids last year...Now they have one out of like 16...The rest are so undependable that it isn't profitable to run them anymore...They usually wait about 4 years before buying new cars for the fleet...This year they replaced EVERY Intrepid except for one with brand new Crown Vics and auctioned off the Dodges...The quality and the ability to take abuse just isn't there in the Dodges...
Last edited by FordLariat; 02-17-2005 at 11:56 PM.
#52
Originally Posted by bigbluebronco43
Is that safety rating true? I'm sure a few widows of cops who died in fires from rear collisions could say different.
http://www.detnews.com/2004/autosins...tos-305582.htm
http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/proble...Vic021003.html
http://www.used-police-cars.com/ford...ptor-safe.html
#53
#54
Originally Posted by Fordlover55
We have new Dodge Intrepids here in our Sheriff Dept. Dodge is underselling Ford by a LONG shot on them. And with tight budgets ... you can guess who's going to buy what ... and let's see if they get the miles the Crown Vics have attained over the years. Bets anyone?
#55
Originally Posted by bluegrasmtns
nobody seems to argue with the fact that Dodge has a history of overhyped junk that has no resale value and will go away within a very few years.
300c might be exciting now, but I don't see anyone getting rid of their camrys and accords to buy one. Dodge is the main reason most people went that direction. Kcar anyone?
300c might be exciting now, but I don't see anyone getting rid of their camrys and accords to buy one. Dodge is the main reason most people went that direction. Kcar anyone?
Also do some research on your statement about "camrys and accords" and tell us who is buying the 300. You maybe surprised.
These statements are not based on facts, they are simply bashing. Again this demostrates the frustration that many have due to the inferior non exciting products from manufactors they are loyal to.
#56
Okay. I <i>know</i> that Chrysler is now owned by Mercedes. Theoretically, MB's build quality would improve the Chrysler breed. It hasn't affected the trucks yet (sadly), but the fact is that the 300C is more than a little bit Mercedes, where the trucks (up til now, anyway) contain no Mercedes DNA. So, I am hopeful that products like the 300C will show a vast improvement in quality control and reliability compared to past Chrysler products...
That having been said, I have to say the I really like the looks of the 300C - it is beautiful, different, and with just a touch of brutality in the styling. Whereas the Ford Five Hundred is just, well, it is quite attractive, but it is kind of bland. It looks like just another sedan, but the 300C stands out in a crowd.
There is another automotive comparison with similar results - though this one favors the Ford.
Ford redesigned the Mustang, and WOW!! I love it! So does the car buying public. Dealers seem to have trouble keeping them in stock. Good for Ford!!
Pontiac reintroduced the GTO, and it is a very good performer, and great fun to drive (with the 6-speed it is serious fun!!). <i>But it looks like a modified Taurus...</i> As a result, the care buying public has received it with a great big yawn. In fact, you might still find examples of last year's model languishing at some dealer with a fairly deep discount attached to it.
Were I to choose between the 300C and a Five Hundred sedan - well, I'd have to go with the 300C and pray it wasn't typical of past Mopars...
...and if it was, I'd enjoy it for a year or two, then trade it in on something else.
That having been said, I have to say the I really like the looks of the 300C - it is beautiful, different, and with just a touch of brutality in the styling. Whereas the Ford Five Hundred is just, well, it is quite attractive, but it is kind of bland. It looks like just another sedan, but the 300C stands out in a crowd.
There is another automotive comparison with similar results - though this one favors the Ford.
Ford redesigned the Mustang, and WOW!! I love it! So does the car buying public. Dealers seem to have trouble keeping them in stock. Good for Ford!!
Pontiac reintroduced the GTO, and it is a very good performer, and great fun to drive (with the 6-speed it is serious fun!!). <i>But it looks like a modified Taurus...</i> As a result, the care buying public has received it with a great big yawn. In fact, you might still find examples of last year's model languishing at some dealer with a fairly deep discount attached to it.
Were I to choose between the 300C and a Five Hundred sedan - well, I'd have to go with the 300C and pray it wasn't typical of past Mopars...
...and if it was, I'd enjoy it for a year or two, then trade it in on something else.
#57
60's Classic MOpars like Roadrunner and Challengers probably do sell well. but for the general buying public you can't honestly say that Kcars, voyagers, Aries, Cirrus, Stratus Volare aspen, and newer cars like intrepids hold resale value, which is to what I am referring.
I have know several people who have been tempted by the deals that dodge makes, only to have it bite them when they go to trade off
I have know several people who have been tempted by the deals that dodge makes, only to have it bite them when they go to trade off
#59
Acronyms for FORD
EDITED out brand bashing acronyms.
I can go on, but just trying to prove a point to stop brand bashing. Read the rules man. I read them but posted this to make a point that all makes have their goods and bads.
EDITED out brand bashing acronyms.
I can go on, but just trying to prove a point to stop brand bashing. Read the rules man. I read them but posted this to make a point that all makes have their goods and bads.
Last edited by Fordlover55; 02-18-2005 at 09:50 PM. Reason: brand bashing
#60
Originally Posted by FRECSF
Check your resale values again. Classic Mopars are ones with the most resale value. I have seen them sale for over 2 million dollars.
Almost any car that had a limited production run, where only a few exist, is in stock trim and you have all the documentation to prove it is worth lots of cash. It does not mean that a company has good resale value.
A little known fact is there are where 11 super charged Shelby 350's built. Only 2 are known to exist and they are not in running condition. I had a chance at one of these 5 years ago. It was all there but a total basket case. 25k to trailer it home. This car though if properly restored would be worth lots. Every manufacture has cars like this and these cars are the cars that bring the big money. You just need to know what to look for and hope the guy selling it dosen't.