Notices
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DP Tuner

Air Intake

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 3, 2005 | 10:29 PM
  #31  
Forced347sn95's Avatar
Forced347sn95
Junior User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
I just put on a AEM intake and I haven't really felt a seat difference. I do know that my mpg on the over head was always at 13.8-14.2 and now it goes from 15.8-16.1. I know that I had a dirty filter before also. Im sure a new filter would have helped but I was waiting for the intake kit
 
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2005 | 12:19 AM
  #32  
444dieselrod's Avatar
444dieselrod
Posting Guru
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,417
Likes: 4
From: Braham MN
I shouldn't even respond but I have to give my .02 I remember that linked thread and this one is turning into the same thing, I didnt respond on the last one, this one I will.

Originally Posted by MobeyDick
If the are no performance gains that really means there are no gains at all so why waist the money for no gain!! They are a waist of your money and could (In his case a loss) be a loss of preformance!! Also from what I have seen in the photos posted with Aftermarket systems they look like they will (if you drive like I do) give you more problems tham they would solve!!

They are still a waist of money!!
A Napa 6637 filter is $30 bucks, hardly a watse of money, a trip to a movie cost that much for a family and that is over in two hours, and you might laugh once, with an aftermarket, the turbo sound will make you smile FOR WEEKS!!!!

Originally Posted by clux
It is pretty well established that the AIS, tymar, and many other system have a higher filtering efficiency with less restriction than the stock system, even though you get no horsepower gain. Filtering efficiency is pretty important, at least to some of us.

All air filters result in a performance loss. So following your train of logic all the way to the to the scene of the train wreck, you should just take the filter out completely (maybe use some screen to keep the big chunks out) and let her rip.

Seems like a great way for you to save money to me.
Cleaner air is denser air, has more potential to make power. try telling anyone who knows there HP stuff that dirty, less filtered air is just as good as clean, well filtered air. But a window screen over your turbo inlet will work too, or leave it off, most insects will burn.

Originally Posted by MobeyDick
It's established by those that have them. It's Human nature to say I have the best!! The stock filter and Box works fine!!

psdjeff: Spend your money if you wish!!
Kind of a contradictory sentence isn't it??? have you ever tried a napa 6637 filter??? I tried the stock box, then I tried the 6637 filter cuz i had an OPEN MIND!!!! don't knock it till you have tried it. 8,000 miles on the filter, still white, no dusting, have hit a few big holes, been bounced to h*ll, still attached, still in one piece.

So try one of these aftermaket or homemade ones and see for yourself. in my case the stock one sucked I noticed a difference in the acceleration, slightly quicker and the turbo realy sings with the 6637. So there you have it.


Diesel Rod
 
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2005 | 07:20 AM
  #33  
Kwikkordead's Avatar
Kwikkordead
Fleet Owner
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 25,090
Likes: 1,111
From: Rio Rico, AZ.
Originally Posted by 444dieselrod
I tried the stock box, then I tried the 6637 filter cuz i had an OPEN MIND!!!! don't knock it till you have tried it. 8,000 miles on the filter, still white, no dusting, have hit a few big holes, been bounced to h*ll, still attached, still in one piece.

So try one of these aftermaket or homemade ones and see for yourself. in my case the stock one sucked I noticed a difference in the acceleration, slightly quicker and the turbo realy sings with the 6637. So there you have it.


Diesel Rod
Amen, preach it brother!!
 
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2005 | 07:42 AM
  #34  
clux's Avatar
clux
Post Fiend
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,600
Likes: 3
From: Carhenge
Originally Posted by MobeyDick
It's established by those that have them. It's Human nature to say I have the best!!
Yes, you've made that point painfully obvious.
 
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2005 | 05:21 PM
  #35  
badabing's Avatar
badabing
New User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
What I have noticed with the NAPA filter set up,is lower EGT which is good for me.I'm glad I went to the Tymar type intake,just need to figure out my CCV.Any suggestions is appreciated.I went with a 4" pipe to replace the CCV adapter thing is all I know to call it.This baby breathes good now.
 
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2005 | 12:46 AM
  #36  
StinkyD's Avatar
StinkyD
Junior User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Victoria
Got my Napa filter installed today. Had some money to "waste" plus got a pretty good deal on the filter. Noticed a little more get up and go. And it sounds pretty tough too.
 
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2005 | 11:42 AM
  #37  
Max1775's Avatar
Max1775
Elder User
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 824
Likes: 0
From: Helotes, Texas
I guess one guys test on aftermarket intakes disproves millions of dollars in research and development that have been done since the internal combustion engine was invented. So this theory doesn't hold up: get more air, then add more fuel, give it a place to exhaust, and BINGO, more power? Increased airflow efficiency in and out doesn't help? I guess I've been mislead by every knowledgeable person I have ever come into contact with on this subject and my own experience to boot. I feel like such a fool... I think it's time to put this thread out to pasture. You can't teach an old dog new tricks, or old tricks for that matter. Good luck everyone on whatever you do to modify your trucks. If it works for you, I don't think it's a waste of money. That's all I have left to say on this thread, so I will unsubscribe.

Max
 
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2005 | 10:12 AM
  #38  
DavidHaile's Avatar
DavidHaile
Junior User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
I agree with the previous poster's message about Ford research being better and more complete than a seat-of-the-pants aftermarket research. I would never had done this modification if the clamps on my airbox were not broken off. I rigged around the problem for several years. I figured the 6637 was the easiest and best way to fix it once and forever. With the sort of driving we do, this air filter should go two years between changes so that is another benefit.

It 6637 mod is easy. I never saw a description on how to do it so I just figured it out myself. Here's the method I would use if I did it again:

(right side, looking at the front of the vehicle)

- Remove battery cables and battery

- Unclip air filter, remove air filter lid by undoing the hose clamp on the near side of the bracket mounted to the engine. Pull the entire assembly off and put it aside.

- Remove air temperature sensor on the side of the air filter box. Tie-wrap it to that handy bracket near the brake master cylinder.

- Remove 2 bolts that were under the battery and 2 bolts that were to the side of the battery. You might also have to remove two very small bolts that were under the air filter.

- Pull complete battery box/air thing out. Using a Sawzall or hack saw, cut the part of the box off that was around the air filter, leaving as complete of a battery box as you can. Hack away!

- Reinstall battery box.

- Attention moves to air filter - Remove air filter lid. Remove the big hose clamp from the hose on the air filter end of the tube. Check the inside of 6637 filter to make sure you haven't dropped a cigarette butt in there.

- The 6637 filter is about 1/4" greater in diameter than the diameter of the rubber tube. It takes some elbow grease but you can get the rubber tube to expand enough to slide it over the end of the filter. It is a very tight fit. I might use some soap on it next time.

- The original hose clamp Will Work! You need to cut off one of the nubs on the outside of the rubber tube so it will fit. You'll only get about 3 or 4 turns on the screw. A slightly longer hose clamp might be better. Crank it down tight.

- Put rubber tube back on the engine-mounted connection.

- Reinstall battery, connect cables. Done!

My filter points slightly down. The steel mesh on the outside does not touch anything valuable so I'm just going to leave it like that. I could do this whole job in less than 30 minutes now that I've done it once. Total cost was about $42 including shipping from Napa. It should easily outlast 3 OEM filters so I figure it pays for itself.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Feb 15, 2005 | 04:23 PM
  #39  
MRBASS's Avatar
MRBASS
Elder User
25 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
From: LAKE FORK TEXAS
I just recently put the factory air box back on and I can tell you i lost 4lbs of boost, EGT's are up 100-150* and nowhere near the throttle response i had before either. I think 4lbs of boost is significant..The kwik filter made a heck of a difference in performance of my truck. Now i know all trucks are different, but even the slightest performance gain makes it worthy of the expense. My 02 has a decent airbox. dosent leak and i did the zoodad mod,not sure if it made any difference though and it is still quite obviously very restrictive, especially compared to the napa 6637 open filter..
Even if the open style filter made no performance gain (but it did) the better filtration would be good enough reason to lose the stock box I would think..
 
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2005 | 05:30 PM
  #40  
Steelbass's Avatar
Steelbass
Freshman User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Ive been told that K&N filters allow bigger chunks of dirt to pass through hence more air flow. Ive used one on a 99 V-10 for 137k miles now and it is still very strong. Its a welding rig so its off road alot. But on a turbo I think its more about surface area than bigger pores in the element. Dale at Tymar has impressed the heck out of me on his knowlegde on this subject. I was worried about an open element but with the amount of surface area it has it should last awhile unless your in the deep dust. Cooler air is always better for performance but less restriction is just as good. As with any upgrades they work better all together than just by themselves. Just a welders point of view, Jamie
 
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2005 | 05:40 PM
  #41  
bodabdan's Avatar
bodabdan
Fleet Mechanic
Veteran: Navy
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,816
Likes: 3
From: River Valley AR
Originally Posted by IABill
OK this may add fuel to an already hot fire but here we go. Is there any downside from using an aftermarket system in respect to pulling warm or hot intake air from under the hood instead of cooler air that may come in from the grill on the stock airbox???
The warmer air is less dense so you get less of it. The negative aspect of getting warmer air is far outweighed by the increased airflow. I have yet to see anyone post that they have regrets about going to an aftermarket intake regardless of which one they use.
I did not stay at a Holiday Inn but I have read many many posts that address this issue. These are real world results posted by my fellow Ford truckers like you. Or you. Or you.
 

Last edited by bodabdan; Feb 15, 2005 at 05:45 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2005 | 11:13 PM
  #42  
Kwikkordead's Avatar
Kwikkordead
Fleet Owner
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 25,090
Likes: 1,111
From: Rio Rico, AZ.
Originally Posted by MRBASS
I just recently put the factory air box back on and I can tell you i lost 4lbs of boost, EGT's are up 100-150* and nowhere near the throttle response i had before either. I think 4lbs of boost is significant..The kwik filter made a heck of a difference in performance of my truck. Now i know all trucks are different, but even the slightest performance gain makes it worthy of the expense. My 02 has a decent airbox. dosent leak and i did the zoodad mod,not sure if it made any difference though and it is still quite obviously very restrictive, especially compared to the napa 6637 open filter..
Even if the open style filter made no performance gain (but it did) the better filtration would be good enough reason to lose the stock box I would think..
Well now I am curious.... what made you decide to put the smaller filter back in? Quieter operation?
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2005 | 10:48 AM
  #43  
trakman's Avatar
trakman
Elder User
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 568
Likes: 1
From: Kansas
I'll jump in this fire now.....I run the Ford AIS on both of my trucks and have piece of mine knowing it's doing a good job of filtering and flows enought air to provide all the power I need. I run a Super Chip on the 70 horsepower setting and couldn't be happer .
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
YooperUno
335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland
11
Feb 17, 2014 10:26 AM
fancyvern
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
3
Sep 26, 2012 12:37 AM
firecatab
6.4L Power Stroke Diesel
3
Aug 20, 2011 12:04 AM
rellikkcaj
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
3
Jan 19, 2007 07:19 AM
bbfan
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
5
May 26, 2006 06:19 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:45 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE