Which 292 block to use
I have two ECZ-C 312 blocks already, including one that's bored .060, and I was thinking that maybe that's the direction I should go, an ECZ-A 292 block that can be easily bored to 3.80 or more.
When I check the distance between the cylinders on the ECZ-C blocks (inserting a drill bit through the freeze plug holes to see what size drill fits between the cylinders) I find that a 1/4" drill will not fit and a 15/64" will fit. I did find that one of the blocks seemed to have a slightly tilted cylinder; the space was wider at the bottom than the top.
When I try the same test on the C2AE block, one side measures 15/64" but the other side measures 17/64 or more; a difference of more than .030", presumably that's .015 per side.
I had heard that the later C1AE and C2AE blocks can't be bored out as much as the ECZ blocks. But the advantage of going with the later block is that they are reported to have beefier main webs, and have main bolt holes drilled a little deeper. I'll have to do a side-by-side comparison tomorrow to see if I can tell the difference.
I have two ECZ-C 312 blocks already, including one that's bored .060, and I was thinking that maybe that's the direction I should go, an ECZ-A 292 block that can be easily bored to 3.80 or more.
When I check the distance between the cylinders on the ECZ-C blocks (inserting a drill bit through the freeze plug holes to see what size drill fits between the cylinders) I find that a 1/4" drill will not fit and a 15/64" will fit. I did find that one of the blocks seemed to have a slightly tilted cylinder; the space was wider at the bottom than the top.
When I try the same test on the C2AE block, one side measures 15/64" but the other side measures 17/64 or more; a difference of more than .030", presumably that's .015 per side.
I had heard that the later C1AE and C2AE blocks can't be bored out as much as the ECZ blocks. But the advantage of going with the later block is that they are reported to have beefier main webs, and have main bolt holes drilled a little deeper. I'll have to do a side-by-side comparison tomorrow to see if I can tell the difference.
It was told to me by teacher Danny Clabourne and owner of Moores garage when i went to vocational mechanic school, that pre 1960 Yblocks had two problems, crank saddles that were not straight, and flat spots on the crankshafts prior to 1960 due to the lathes used in that time, but then today, that could easily be fixed. It is true however that the late Yblock does not have the beefier upper end (cylinder, heads and rockers) that the earlier y's did. But i can say, i have had very good luck with both my late Y's. If you can get away with not having to bore that C2AE out anymore than 0.60 over, i think you'll have a great engine, in my case i got lucky and mine is only 0.20 over, imagine how long mine will last, it has at least two more bores left in it, provided i take care of it......Janet
Last edited by Janet40; Dec 19, 2004 at 05:32 AM.
Obviously the original processes were far from rocket science and I wonder if the later blocks were just simply drilled & tapped deeper. There certainly is plenty of depth available in early blocks.





