255ci V8?
#1
255ci V8?
Earlier this year I bought a 1981 F100. it is a good truck, but I have some questions I have been trying to answer for several months now. (that is how I found FTE). here are some of my questions.
When I first bought the truck I noticed that the tag said it was a 255ci (4.2l).
The only 4.2l I have heard of was the 256ci v6, but I noticed that this thing had 8 cylinders, so the idea of their being a typo, and the engine realy being a 256was dropped. since then I have determined that the crank was bad; removed the engine and replaced it with a 302fi with rollercams.
If anyone as any info at all I am willing to listen.
My second question that this truck is labeled as a custom f100 explorer, i thought these were known earlier as the rangers, and then as the f100.
When I first bought the truck I noticed that the tag said it was a 255ci (4.2l).
The only 4.2l I have heard of was the 256ci v6, but I noticed that this thing had 8 cylinders, so the idea of their being a typo, and the engine realy being a 256was dropped. since then I have determined that the crank was bad; removed the engine and replaced it with a 302fi with rollercams.
If anyone as any info at all I am willing to listen.
My second question that this truck is labeled as a custom f100 explorer, i thought these were known earlier as the rangers, and then as the f100.
#2
I bought a parts truck a little over a year ago and it had a 255CI V8. It is a Y block and is most common in the older T-Birds and 60's van's.
The Ranger and Explorer names were a trim level. I have seen many early 80's F100's/F150's with the Explorer labels on them. For example the XLT Ranger trim could be on an F100 or F250 (maybe an F350 but I have not seen any).
The Ranger and Explorer names were a trim level. I have seen many early 80's F100's/F150's with the Explorer labels on them. For example the XLT Ranger trim could be on an F100 or F250 (maybe an F350 but I have not seen any).
#4
255v8?
So far I have heard that it was made in the early 80's as a more fuel efficient 302. it was the same block just smaller bore, and slightly diffrent valves. It was lacking about 10 hp from the 302, and they droped it becouse t-bird fans were not happy with the loss of power. I did not know it was made in any other years except 1980-83.
#5
#6
Originally Posted by Mr. Finch
So far I have heard that it was made in the early 80's as a more fuel efficient 302. it was the same block just smaller bore, and slightly diffrent valves. It was lacking about 10 hp from the 302, and they droped it becouse t-bird fans were not happy with the loss of power. I did not know it was made in any other years except 1980-83.
Specifications are virtually the same as the 302 with exception of the bores. They were reduced to 3.68 (i.e. 3.68 x 3.00) inches and unnecessary cast-iron was removed to make the block even lighter.
Built from 1980 to 1982 MY, cars and trucks.
#7
Trending Topics
#8
That is the reason I heard it was dropped is becouse it lacked the power. But does it have any value to a collector. In other words, if I decide to fix and sell the truck as an antique would it be worth morewith the original carberated 255, or with an after thought fuel injected 302 (with roller cams)
#9
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JohnOB
Y-Block V8 (239, 272, 292, 312, 317, 341, 368)
14
12-22-2006 01:01 PM