255ci V8?
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 684
Likes: 1
255ci V8?
Earlier this year I bought a 1981 F100. it is a good truck, but I have some questions I have been trying to answer for several months now. (that is how I found FTE). here are some of my questions.
When I first bought the truck I noticed that the tag said it was a 255ci (4.2l).
The only 4.2l I have heard of was the 256ci v6, but I noticed that this thing had 8 cylinders, so the idea of their being a typo, and the engine realy being a 256was dropped. since then I have determined that the crank was bad; removed the engine and replaced it with a 302fi with rollercams.
If anyone as any info at all I am willing to listen.
My second question that this truck is labeled as a custom f100 explorer, i thought these were known earlier as the rangers, and then as the f100.
When I first bought the truck I noticed that the tag said it was a 255ci (4.2l).
The only 4.2l I have heard of was the 256ci v6, but I noticed that this thing had 8 cylinders, so the idea of their being a typo, and the engine realy being a 256was dropped. since then I have determined that the crank was bad; removed the engine and replaced it with a 302fi with rollercams.
If anyone as any info at all I am willing to listen.
My second question that this truck is labeled as a custom f100 explorer, i thought these were known earlier as the rangers, and then as the f100.
Cargo Master
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,430
Likes: 2
From: NH
I bought a parts truck a little over a year ago and it had a 255CI V8. It is a Y block and is most common in the older T-Birds and 60's van's.
The Ranger and Explorer names were a trim level. I have seen many early 80's F100's/F150's with the Explorer labels on them. For example the XLT Ranger trim could be on an F100 or F250 (maybe an F350 but I have not seen any).
The Ranger and Explorer names were a trim level. I have seen many early 80's F100's/F150's with the Explorer labels on them. For example the XLT Ranger trim could be on an F100 or F250 (maybe an F350 but I have not seen any).
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 684
Likes: 1
255v8?
So far I have heard that it was made in the early 80's as a more fuel efficient 302. it was the same block just smaller bore, and slightly diffrent valves. It was lacking about 10 hp from the 302, and they droped it becouse t-bird fans were not happy with the loss of power. I did not know it was made in any other years except 1980-83.
Cargo Master
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,430
Likes: 2
From: NH
guess I need to look into this more.
Somone somewhere told be it was a Y block. didn't keep the motor so I didn't look into it more.
sorry for the mis-information
I knew someone on here whould know tho.
Sence I joined here I have gained some knowledge and have seen lots of smart ppl.
Somone somewhere told be it was a Y block. didn't keep the motor so I didn't look into it more.
sorry for the mis-information
I knew someone on here whould know tho.
Sence I joined here I have gained some knowledge and have seen lots of smart ppl.
Freshman User
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Chile, SouthAmerica
Originally Posted by Mr. Finch
So far I have heard that it was made in the early 80's as a more fuel efficient 302. it was the same block just smaller bore, and slightly diffrent valves. It was lacking about 10 hp from the 302, and they droped it becouse t-bird fans were not happy with the loss of power. I did not know it was made in any other years except 1980-83.
Specifications are virtually the same as the 302 with exception of the bores. They were reduced to 3.68 (i.e. 3.68 x 3.00) inches and unnecessary cast-iron was removed to make the block even lighter.
Built from 1980 to 1982 MY, cars and trucks.
New User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Central Florida
About the only use it has any more is as a boat anchor. It wasn't a bad motor, just lacked power and was a very limited run. I had one in a Capri. Was a reliable motor but it was definately lacking power.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 684
Likes: 1
That is the reason I heard it was dropped is becouse it lacked the power. But does it have any value to a collector. In other words, if I decide to fix and sell the truck as an antique would it be worth morewith the original carberated 255, or with an after thought fuel injected 302 (with roller cams)
FTE Stories
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make
Brett Foote
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!
Michael S. Palmer
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home
Verdad Gallardo
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!
Joe Kucinski
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?
Brett Foote
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!
Michael S. Palmer
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!
Joe Kucinski
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026
Brett Foote
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time
Joe Kucinski
Elder User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 926
Likes: 3
From: SE, Michigan
I wouldn't think it would have any collector value. I have a 82 F100 with the 300 I6. I believe that you could get the 80-83 F100's with the 3.8 V6, 4.2 V8, 4.9 I6 or the 5.0 V8. The first two engines where horrible attempts at trying to get better gas mileage.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JohnOB
Y-Block V8 (239, 272, 292, 312, 317, 341, 368)
14
Dec 22, 2006 01:01 PM
rwall0113
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
8
Apr 15, 2004 08:44 AM