1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Early Eighties Bullnose Ford Truck

255ci V8?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-29-2004, 02:43 PM
Mr. Finch's Avatar
Mr. Finch
Mr. Finch is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
255ci V8?

Earlier this year I bought a 1981 F100. it is a good truck, but I have some questions I have been trying to answer for several months now. (that is how I found FTE). here are some of my questions.

When I first bought the truck I noticed that the tag said it was a 255ci (4.2l).
The only 4.2l I have heard of was the 256ci v6, but I noticed that this thing had 8 cylinders, so the idea of their being a typo, and the engine realy being a 256was dropped. since then I have determined that the crank was bad; removed the engine and replaced it with a 302fi with rollercams.
If anyone as any info at all I am willing to listen.

My second question that this truck is labeled as a custom f100 explorer, i thought these were known earlier as the rangers, and then as the f100.
 
  #2  
Old 11-29-2004, 02:58 PM
7283-F250's Avatar
7283-F250
7283-F250 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 3,428
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I bought a parts truck a little over a year ago and it had a 255CI V8. It is a Y block and is most common in the older T-Birds and 60's van's.

The Ranger and Explorer names were a trim level. I have seen many early 80's F100's/F150's with the Explorer labels on them. For example the XLT Ranger trim could be on an F100 or F250 (maybe an F350 but I have not seen any).
 
  #3  
Old 11-29-2004, 03:10 PM
V10KLZZ71S's Avatar
V10KLZZ71S
V10KLZZ71S is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Gretna ,LA.
Posts: 1,769
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
The 255 was a smog era motor that came in Fairmonts,Granada's but i did not know they came in trucks.It was based on the 302,i believe.
 
  #4  
Old 11-29-2004, 05:18 PM
Mr. Finch's Avatar
Mr. Finch
Mr. Finch is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
255v8?

So far I have heard that it was made in the early 80's as a more fuel efficient 302. it was the same block just smaller bore, and slightly diffrent valves. It was lacking about 10 hp from the 302, and they droped it becouse t-bird fans were not happy with the loss of power. I did not know it was made in any other years except 1980-83.
 
  #5  
Old 11-30-2004, 07:39 AM
7283-F250's Avatar
7283-F250
7283-F250 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 3,428
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
guess I need to look into this more.

Somone somewhere told be it was a Y block. didn't keep the motor so I didn't look into it more.
sorry for the mis-information

I knew someone on here whould know tho.

Sence I joined here I have gained some knowledge and have seen lots of smart ppl.
 
  #6  
Old 11-30-2004, 05:45 PM
frohlich's Avatar
frohlich
frohlich is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Chile, SouthAmerica
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr. Finch
So far I have heard that it was made in the early 80's as a more fuel efficient 302. it was the same block just smaller bore, and slightly diffrent valves. It was lacking about 10 hp from the 302, and they droped it becouse t-bird fans were not happy with the loss of power. I did not know it was made in any other years except 1980-83.
(from a book)
Specifications are virtually the same as the 302 with exception of the bores. They were reduced to 3.68 (i.e. 3.68 x 3.00) inches and unnecessary cast-iron was removed to make the block even lighter.
Built from 1980 to 1982 MY, cars and trucks.
 
  #7  
Old 11-30-2004, 07:13 PM
Cougar64's Avatar
Cougar64
Cougar64 is offline
New User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
About the only use it has any more is as a boat anchor. It wasn't a bad motor, just lacked power and was a very limited run. I had one in a Capri. Was a reliable motor but it was definately lacking power.
 
  #8  
Old 11-30-2004, 07:40 PM
Mr. Finch's Avatar
Mr. Finch
Mr. Finch is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That is the reason I heard it was dropped is becouse it lacked the power. But does it have any value to a collector. In other words, if I decide to fix and sell the truck as an antique would it be worth morewith the original carberated 255, or with an after thought fuel injected 302 (with roller cams)
 
  #9  
Old 11-30-2004, 10:45 PM
1982fordf100's Avatar
1982fordf100
1982fordf100 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: SE, Michigan
Posts: 926
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I wouldn't think it would have any collector value. I have a 82 F100 with the 300 I6. I believe that you could get the 80-83 F100's with the 3.8 V6, 4.2 V8, 4.9 I6 or the 5.0 V8. The first two engines where horrible attempts at trying to get better gas mileage.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JohnOB
Y-Block V8 (239, 272, 292, 312, 317, 341, 368)
14
12-22-2006 01:01 PM
55F350Dually
Flathead V8 & Flathead 6
6
05-20-2005 05:45 PM
55F350Dually
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
04-02-2005 02:56 PM
rwall0113
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
8
04-15-2004 08:44 AM
rwall0113
3.8 & 4.2L V6
3
04-23-2003 08:05 AM



Quick Reply: 255ci V8?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:54 PM.