Engine simulation programs
Go to my page and click on the second red link 'Engine Analyzer v3.0'............ http://www.geocities.com/my90lariat/index.html
I won't charge you.... this time :-)
90f150moneypit
Do you have desktop dyno? I was wondering because this analyzer has brought on some confusion, as far as, I am concerned. If you punch in one of the smaller comp xe camshafts in a mild 351w combo you will lose torque and hp vs a stock 2V camshaft, doesn't that sound odd? Just wondering, maybe there is something I am not doing right. I read somewhere you almost have that stroker 418 together.
The 418 is almost done, well the shortblock is together anyway. I'm waiting on my AFR's. Then once my wallet stops hurting, I'm ordering my custom cam (by Jay Allen) and the rest of it like the intake and carb. The headers are going to be my problem. I was going to have Pickerel (SP?) make up a set of 1 7/8 long tubes but I see they are no longer in business.............may have to live with small tubes...
I don't think hes been outta business that long, maybe you can get him to make you a set.
Well that 418 should make for some fun, good luck
Last edited by jwtaylor; Nov 16, 2004 at 10:11 AM.
Trending Topics
If you get a chance try this, using your EA analyzer.
Punch in 351w standard bore.
stock 70 heads, change the compression to 9:1
edelbrock performer intake
600 cfm street carb
typical exhaust manifold-typical production shorty headers
typical production 8 cylinder exhaust (300 cfm flow)
then punch in these three camshafts and watch the avg hp and tq
*stock 2V camshaft
*B1R WG- 1149 (same as paw 11329) blue racer
*B1R WG- 1108 (same as paw 10328 and edelbrock performer) blueracer
My results:
Stock 2V - avg hp 180 avg tq 266
B1R 1149 - avg hp 169 avg tq 257
B1R 1108 - avg hp 175 avg tq 260 (this is the edelbrock performer)
So now I am wondering how the 351w HO or 4V camshaft would do, its not listed and I don't have the specs but given the 2V does so well, it leaves a person with two way of thinking, either a mild cam swap is useless as compared to the stock 351w camshaft or somethings not right with the program or should I say something is missing that dramatically affects the results.... or the 2V 351w camshaft listed on the EA program might be the best kept secret for a mild combo...??...
Now compare the XE250H-10 and the XE256H-10 to the 2V and the avg hp and tq is still better with the stock 2V cam, weird huh?
Last edited by jwtaylor; Nov 16, 2004 at 07:05 PM.
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
The 2V cam is actually a bit bigger than the 1149 (@.050 lift).
Now, advance the 2V cam to 8 deg advanced and look at the curve. The intake centerline of the two are now the same.
Gotta look at all the specs, well basically the whole picture.
Ohh, and no I wasn't saying EA gives either FWHP or RWHP. Just that I have seen the AVG numbers match pretty close to RW numbers that I have seen.
I am having trouble believeing that the 2v 351w camshaft specs listed are correct.
The comp XE 250 and 256 and edelbrock performer, are supposed to be an improvement over stock, but if the specs for the 2V are correct...then comp/crane/edelbrock dropped the ball. Right? Its not an improvement if you lose tq and hp. Know what I mean?
Try this on DD.
Shortblock
351W
4.030 bore
4.1 Stroke (Scat Forged)
6" Rod (Scat I Beam's)
(28cc Dishtop SRP's)
No accessories/Elec Fan and water pump
Low windage
Lower Friction Pistons/Bearings
Cam (Solid Flat);
Intake Centerline ATDC - 106
Duration @.050 224
Max Lobe Lift .312
Lash .018
Rocker 1.6
Exhaust Centerline BTDC - 114
Duration @.050 224
Max Lobe Lift .312
Lash .018
Rocker 1.6
Lobe Seperation 110
Gross Lift .499
Heads
(AFR's aren't in the library, just change these numbers after choosing Performer RPM's)
AFR 185 58cc Chambers for 10.02CR
2.02/1.60 Valves
186 Ports Volume
Port Length 5inch
Intake flow Effinciency 56.5
Exh Flow Effinciency 57.9
Intake
Edelbrock RPM Airgap (Choose Typical Race Dual Plane)
Carb - 750 Vac Sec
Exhaust
Street Headers - 1 3/4" X 38"
Open Exhaust
Running conditions
STD Dyno
91 Octane
Coolant temp - 195 deg
RPMS---- Start 1000/ number of RPM's - 10/ Increment - 500/ Peak HP - 5500/ Int runner - 10
Let me know what you come up with......
This is what your combo looks like:
423 HP @ 5500 rpm
471 LB FT @ 3500 rpm
He thinks you need about 5 degrees more cam, and slightly narrower lobe separation. This is the results of that:
with my 230/235 .510/.515 lift solid cam
426 HP @ both 5000 & 5500 RPM
486 lb ft @ 3500 RPM
He thinks you need more lift as well.
Using 1.7 ratio rocker arms which raised the lift on his cam to .530 you get the following:
426 HP @ 5500 RPM
471 lb ft @ 3500 RPM
He commented, "While this doesnt look like much I noticed that the torque curve and the hp curve were fattened some."
If you have any questions let me know, I will ask. Looks like your gonna have a torque maker for sure. Later



