Notices

Engine simulation programs

Old Nov 19, 2004 | 11:47 AM
  #16  
90f150moneypit's Avatar
90f150moneypit
Posting Guru
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
From: Still under the hood in O
Keep in mind, I'm building for torque in the 2K to 4500 RPM range and letting the HP fall where it may.

According to EA (YES, I know these are wishadyno numbers) it's close to 491HP @5500 and 533TQ @4K.

I'm not looking for peak numbers, rather the TQ curve.
The AFR numbers I used are from AFR's web site. I know I could have made much more HP but this is the curve I like for the truck.
Here is a graph from EA.

 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 12:03 PM
  #17  
jwtaylor's Avatar
jwtaylor
Postmaster
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,496
Likes: 0
I know what you mean, Seems like 5 degrees more cam, and slightly narrower lobe separation gave 3 more hp and peaked 500 rpm sooner and held for another 500 rpm. Also provided 15 lbfttq more at the same rpm. How does that adjustment affect the combo on the EA?


Only a red X shows up on my end.


later
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 12:24 PM
  #18  
Saurian's Avatar
Saurian
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,155
Likes: 3
From: Centerville, Iowa
Does anybody have the stock specs for the 302 cam that would be running around in my 94 Ford? I entered as close to stock as I could make it find, and it is returning that I have 231 Peak HP and 303 Peak Tq....and I think its the cam that is doing it.

Interesting is the fact that addition of headers and full 2.25" dual exhaust did little to nothing with EA....
 

Last edited by Saurian; Nov 19, 2004 at 12:46 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 01:44 PM
  #19  
jwtaylor's Avatar
jwtaylor
Postmaster
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,496
Likes: 0
All I have is what haynes states as lift at the lobe for .2375 int and .2474 exh. If you really wanted to know, a cam company that offers oe replacements, should have that information.
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 07:25 PM
  #20  
Fordever2's Avatar
Fordever2
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
when i go to instal it. it says cant read in ms dos thing or sumthin along those lines then asks cancel or ignore then if i hit ignore nuthin happens still.
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 08:01 PM
  #21  
jwtaylor's Avatar
jwtaylor
Postmaster
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,496
Likes: 0
I uninstalled the program to narrow down another problem I am having. You might wanna remove/delete the folder and try it again from the beginning. I listed the following, which is every step I took to get the program working again...good luck

Go to 90f150moneypits website.

Right click on red EA analyzer link.

When it was complete I hit close.

Then went to desk top , found EA30 folder and RIGHT clicked on it then chose open

Then I RIGHT clicked on DISK 1 then chose open

Then I RIGHT clicked on the 13th icon, looks like an empty screen with INSTALL under it, chose open

then clicked open on the next window that popped up

clicked yes ...next ...yes ...next ...yes ...yes

couple errors popped up clicked okay, then clicked out of a screen listing info on the ea, then punched in a username and password, hit okay and its done.
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 08:12 PM
  #22  
jwtaylor's Avatar
jwtaylor
Postmaster
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,496
Likes: 0
You may wanna rethink installing this right now. I just double checked some things and when I downloaded this program it blocked my access to a few sites...again. Not sure why but just letting you know, do it at your own risk. good luck
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 09:39 PM
  #23  
Fordever2's Avatar
Fordever2
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
still couldnt get it to work
just gets to the same part where it says cancel or ignore then i can click either one and nothing happens
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Nov 20, 2004 | 11:08 AM
  #24  
mako5972's Avatar
mako5972
Elder User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
From: Ocala, Florida
I am not one that can get programs to work for me. I guess I must be challenged. Would somebody be as so kind as to assist me? Can you run my combination and help me get the most out of it, without any problems? I would appreciate it. 351W with Windsor Jr heads (58cc), Keith Black Silvolite Pistons (hypereutectic) 22 cc cup, Roller Rockers, Weiand Stealth Intake, Holley Truck Avenger 670 cfm, Hedmann Elite Headers, Jacobs Mileagemaster Ignition, Comp Cams Xtreme Energy 4X4 camshaft X4254H. Operating range 1200 to 5200 rpms, duration @ .050 Intake 210, Exhaust 218, valve lift w/1.6 rocker Intake .477, Exhaust .493. ARP Bolts. Reduced friction bearings, the rotating assembly is balanced. I really appreciate it.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2004 | 12:54 PM
  #25  
jwtaylor's Avatar
jwtaylor
Postmaster
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,496
Likes: 0
I punched in world heads, it shows 10:1 comp, I thought that was high, so I punched in 9.5:1, not able to get specific with the gaskets and piston cc, you either punch in the overall cc (heads, cylinder, gasket) or guess. Its only 3-4 hp either way add if between 9.5 and 10 or subtract if between 8 and 9.5.

I was able to get to get something real close to elite headers, I used a dual 2 1/4" exhast as well.

Found a camshaft real close to the 4X4 comp, the comp XE256H-10 changed the lift and duration to match the 4X4 grind, which wasn't but a small amount, so the specs should be accurate.

NO weiand but I did find a performer rpm, don't have the stealth specs so I went with the performer rpm, close enough.

clicked low friction for the assembly as well. I am unable to copy or print the graph so I cannot show you the actual graph/ data but I will write down what I see:


.......horsepower.....torque
1500...59.................209
2000...102...............269
2500...144...............303
3000...180...............316
3500...222...............332
4000...254...............334
4500...271...............316
5000...262...............275
5500...237...............227
6000...201...............176

Average torque 276 and average horsepower 193. later
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2004 | 01:16 PM
  #26  
mako5972's Avatar
mako5972
Elder User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
From: Ocala, Florida
Thank you. Were there any problems w/valve train noise?
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2004 | 01:37 PM
  #27  
mako5972's Avatar
mako5972
Elder User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
From: Ocala, Florida
Thank you. Maybe before I bring the stuff to the machine shop I will get a bigger cam, I was looking for 300 plus horsepower and more torque. I don't want to go too big on the cam because I need the low end grunt. I want to be able to have the same power as the new trucks. Do you have any suggestions?
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2004 | 03:30 PM
  #28  
jwtaylor's Avatar
jwtaylor
Postmaster
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,496
Likes: 0
Thats a pretty basic combo you shouldn't have any problems.


I may be wrong but you should have 300hp with that combo. You could always use a better head.

On this program going from world jr to edelborck performer the hp and tq jumped.

peak tq 341 average tq 289
peak hp 300 average hp 210


If thats not enough for you there is afr 165's and if that doesn't satisfy you, stroke it to 393 and throw a bigger carb on it. I would figure out what heads you wanna run then get a cam to match it vs upping the cam without upping the head flow. later
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2004 | 08:17 PM
  #29  
jwtaylor's Avatar
jwtaylor
Postmaster
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,496
Likes: 0
mako5972

Food for thought, I punched in the larger 4X4 cam and the hp and tq did not improve until after 4500-5000 rpm so going with a larger cam wouldn't be needed. I also punched in the specs for the stock 85 and later 351w cam, according to this program the results were very close to the cam you wanted me to run the first time. odd huh?

The performer were definitely better than the world jr though.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2004 | 09:47 PM
  #30  
90f150moneypit's Avatar
90f150moneypit
Posting Guru
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
From: Still under the hood in O
Man, I need to get online more often....Sorry guy's, should have said to select 'open' instead of 'save' when downloading.

Not knowing what bore size, head gasket size or deck height we can only guess at the compression.....

Well I ran the guessadyno and as JW did, used the RPM manifold. I used 9:0.1 CR and Jr's with the 4x4 cam. I came up with 320HP and 369TQ. A switch to the RPM heads got 346HP and 384TQ with the improvements happening between 2500 and 3K RPM and up. Both test's with open headers.

Are my graph's showing up for anyone?
 

Last edited by 90f150moneypit; Nov 20, 2004 at 09:55 PM.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:54 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE