Notices

390 2bbl

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 12:27 PM
  #1  
ford390gashog's Avatar
ford390gashog
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Owner
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 26,007
Likes: 573
From: Brentwood,CA
Club FTE Gold Member
390 2bbl

right now i am running a stock d5te 2bbl manifold on a 390 in a 75 ford truck the carb is a 2150 with 351 cfm is there a problem with running the setup like this and why did ford put 2bbl manifolds on the trucks
 
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 12:41 PM
  #2  
85e150's Avatar
85e150
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,419
Likes: 2,777
Club FTE Gold Member
We had a 390 2v in a '66 wagon and a '73 F100--both worked fine.

That CFM will work fine for most driving and I never had any trouble running that wagon up to 100mph, despite the total disconnect between the road and the wheel due to the steering. The F100 ran fine as well. Both were hampered more by restrictive exhaust than by intake limitations.

If your '75 has run stock that way for 29 years, I wouldn't think there is a problem.

If you want problems, put a rich running 4bbl with light secondary springs in it on there and watch your money, oil and rings go out the tailpipe.

And watch for the "You'll actually get better mileage with a 4 bbl because the primaries are smaller than the 2bbl".

Yea, that's true, but keeping your foot out of a 4bbl is like leaving those fresh cookies alone. It's a unnatural act to not step into a 4bbl.

Put a big open air cleaner on it, some headers and twice pipes with a crossover tube and roll on.
 
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 12:46 PM
  #3  
ford390gashog's Avatar
ford390gashog
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Owner
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 26,007
Likes: 573
From: Brentwood,CA
Club FTE Gold Member
the engine is a fresh rebuild and i am going to use the stock setup for now and i thought it would be ok thanks for your help
 
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 02:13 PM
  #4  
Annihilator's Avatar
Annihilator
Elder User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
I thought they were 430 or 450 CFM...
 
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 04:55 PM
  #5  
cleanLX's Avatar
cleanLX
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 541
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix Az, by way of Fre
I rebuilt my 390 and kept the stock 2bbl carb(rebuilt).
It ran.
Had hot start issues, run on issues, cold idle issues, stumbeling issues, detonation issues... just regular drivability stuff. As long as the truck was moving, and had a light throttle things were fine.
I rebuilt the carb again, hopeing to fix driveability, and again, rejet'd, phenolic spacer... tried it all. (timing, plugs, points, large cap conversion then electronic ignition etc...)
Finally broke down and picked up 500cfm Holley.
Driveability issues went bye bye, throttle response improved, and power is noticably greater...
Was $220 well spent.
If it's a 30 some year old carb, I'd consider tossing it and going with a new one. Whether you choose a stock replacemant or whatever, I went 500cfm because it was $220 rather than $300+ for the 350cfm one.

Good luck.
 
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 05:02 PM
  #6  
samckernan's Avatar
samckernan
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
From: Planet Earth
Originally Posted by 85e150six4mtod
And watch for the "You'll actually get better mileage with a 4 bbl because the primaries are smaller than the 2bbl".

Yea, that's true, but keeping your foot out of a 4bbl is like leaving those fresh cookies alone. It's a unnatural act to not step into a 4bbl.
Yeah, there's something about fresh cookies!

samckernan
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
72CS
New Member Introductions
2
May 20, 2014 10:58 PM
dusty2052000
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
1
Mar 20, 2006 09:23 PM
Chris 73
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
16
Jun 7, 2005 01:08 AM
ford390gashog
Fuel Injection, Carburetion & Fuel System
1
Sep 10, 2004 07:30 PM
philipwhite
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
6
Jun 12, 2002 10:38 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:41 AM.