Notices
Audio & Video Systems, Navigation, Satellite Radio & Mobile Electronics
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

Bi-Amping

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 21, 2004 | 03:16 PM
  #1  
2004lariat's Avatar
2004lariat
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Bi-Amping

Speakers - SPS571A Alpine Component speekers
Amp - MRV-F340 4 channel Alpine V12 Amp

Situation - want to take the 2 front channels and send to the 2 tweeters. Take the 2 rear channels and send to the 2 mids.

Question - the cross overs that came with the speakers do not support bi-amping, however, my amp does have both high/low crossovers built in for both front and rear channels.

Is it still safe to do it this way (using the amps built in cross oversand removing the speaker crossovers)without adding in an external crossover before the amp?
 
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2004 | 03:27 PM
  #2  
PrPlayboy's Avatar
PrPlayboy
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
From: New Canaan, CT
You best bet would be an external crossover because you will have the ability to adjust the cut off frequancy. The high cut off on the amp is only a high pass crossover which would send your tweeters way too much to play. The low pass X over is just bass. Set both to full or turn them off then run an external x-over from the radio to the amp.

If you not going for a high SQ system you might be impressed with just bridging the amp to the components at full range and the the speaker cross overs do the rest....
 
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2004 | 04:13 PM
  #3  
2004lariat's Avatar
2004lariat
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: Canada
I beleive the MRV-F340 4 channel Alpine V12 Amp has adjustable crossovers built in for the high & low crossovers. If that is the case would I still need the an extra crossover berore the amp?
 
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2004 | 05:28 PM
  #4  
LinearPower's Avatar
LinearPower
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Central Ohio
Originally Posted by 2004lariat
Speakers - SPS571A Alpine Component speekers
Amp - MRV-F340 4 channel Alpine V12 Amp

Situation - want to take the 2 front channels and send to the 2 tweeters. Take the 2 rear channels and send to the 2 mids.

Question - the cross overs that came with the speakers do not support bi-amping, however, my amp does have both high/low crossovers built in for both front and rear channels.

Is it still safe to do it this way (using the amps built in cross oversand removing the speaker crossovers)without adding in an external crossover before the amp?


I've seen your question on two or three different forums. I'm curious to know why you want to do this. There are several reasons NOT to. The amp's low pass/high pass filter is NOT the same as the crossover NETWORK with your components. The amp does NOT provide for the "bandpass" filtering you will need for the mids. Bandpass means it passes a band of frequencies in the middle of the frequency spectrum for your mids. The amp does NOT provide a high enough filter "point" for the tweeters. The tweeters on their own, without their passive crossover NETWORK, would not handle 55 watts. I can think of no reason this would be beneficial. Like I said on another forum, you could use an electronic crossover, but even that would give you little, if any, sound quality benefits.
 
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2004 | 07:34 PM
  #5  
angus's Avatar
angus
Posting Guru
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 2
From: Vancouver Island
Use the passive crossover; if it's a good design it may deliver more accurate sound quality than an active crossover. (because a passive crossover can be designed to specifically match the tweeter and midbass, whereas an active crossover assumes "perfect" drivers).
Bridge the other two channels and drive a sub.
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2004 | 10:20 PM
  #6  
Muffinman's Avatar
Muffinman
Laughing Gas
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 3
From: Dallas, Texas
I have this very same setup. You can use your head unit to control the crossover for the front speakers, If it's a Alpine highend unit. I use the CDA-9831 which supports Amp linking. This allows you to adjust the crossover and all from there without opening the Amp.


I hooked up my F340 in 4 channel mode to the rear 571A's, Then used the other 2 channels to drive Two SWS 1042D's Subs which support Bi-Amping. I would not bridge these speakers. If you got the extra cash get the 9833 which has V-Drive to 17.4 volts.

The Speakers are in a Aerostar with the Rear hatch housing the 571's and the Two Subs mounted in the floor angled at 30 Degrees to reflect off the rear glass first.
 
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2004 | 01:35 PM
  #7  
LinearPower's Avatar
LinearPower
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Central Ohio
Originally Posted by Muffinman
I have this very same setup. You can use your head unit to control the crossover for the front speakers, If it's a Alpine highend unit. I use the CDA-9831 which supports Amp linking. This allows you to adjust the crossover and all from there without opening the Amp.


I hooked up my F340 in 4 channel mode to the rear 571A's, Then used the other 2 channels to drive Two SWS 1042D's Subs which support Bi-Amping. I would not bridge these speakers. If you got the extra cash get the 9833 which has V-Drive to 17.4 volts.

The Speakers are in a Aerostar with the Rear hatch housing the 571's and the Two Subs mounted in the floor angled at 30 Degrees to reflect off the rear glass first.
Re-read what he was considering. It wasn't the same thing that you did. He was wanting to amplify the tweeters and the mids separately WITHOUT using the passive crossovers that came with the speakers. The amp does not work for this on its own. There has to be some kind of crossover system used, as I mentioned.
 
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2004 | 08:08 PM
  #8  
Muffinman's Avatar
Muffinman
Laughing Gas
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 3
From: Dallas, Texas
Originally Posted by LinearPower
Re-read what he was considering. It wasn't the same thing that you did. He was wanting to amplify the tweeters and the mids separately WITHOUT using the passive crossovers that came with the speakers. The amp does not work for this on its own. There has to be some kind of crossover system used, as I mentioned.
I forgot that he needs a Alpine CDA9835 or 9833 head unit to do this.

I still would not do what he is asking. The crossover that comes with the speakers need to be there. I also upgraded to a 9833 today and I think it can control the configuration he is tring to do. I just have no need to.
 

Last edited by Muffinman; Nov 26, 2004 at 08:12 PM.
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-3

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-4

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-6

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

Ford Super Duty: 5 Things Owners LOVE, 5 Things They LOATHE!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Every 2026 Ford Truck Engine RANKED from WORST to FIRST!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

The Best F-150 Deal of Every Trim Level (XL through Raptor)

 Joe Kucinski
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gman97005
1968-Present E-Series Van/Cutaway/Chassis
3
Jun 26, 2014 02:55 PM
rizocg
Audio & Video Systems, Navigation, Satellite Radio & Mobile Electronics
1
Aug 1, 2006 10:23 PM
captain p4
Audio & Video Systems, Navigation, Satellite Radio & Mobile Electronics
15
May 5, 2006 02:25 PM
k80kid
2004 - 2008 F150
47
Jan 13, 2005 07:54 AM
Squirrel RJ
Audio & Video Systems, Navigation, Satellite Radio & Mobile Electronics
2
Jan 3, 2005 07:37 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:41 PM.

story-0
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-2
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-3
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-6
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
Ford Super Duty: 5 Things Owners LOVE, 5 Things They LOATHE!

Slideshow: Ranking the 5 things owners love about their Super Duty and 5 things they don't

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:36:49


VIEW MORE
story-8
Every 2026 Ford Truck Engine RANKED from WORST to FIRST!

Slideshow: Ranking all 12 Ford truck engines available in 2026.

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 13:32:20


VIEW MORE
story-9
The Best F-150 Deal of Every Trim Level (XL through Raptor)

Slideshow: The best Ford F-150 deal for every trim level (XL through Raptor)

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-21 15:59:01


VIEW MORE