Notices
General Automotive Discussion

half ton, full ton

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 30, 2004 | 06:45 PM
  #1  
thetomster's Avatar
thetomster
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
half ton, full ton

This might be a stupid question but I am wondering what the half-ton, 3/4 ton, and full ton actually weigh. I believe it is the frame weight but get a lot of arguments. Please reply back with an answer. Thanks Tom
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2004 | 07:19 PM
  #2  
andym's Avatar
andym
Post Fiend
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 19,402
Likes: 38
From: Bonita Springs FL
It has nothing to do with actual weight. Well, anymore. Now it's basically used as an indicator of strength. A one tun truck is stronger than a 3/4 ton, which is stronger than a half ton.
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2004 | 07:52 PM
  #3  
fellro86's Avatar
fellro86
Hotshot
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 11,697
Likes: 3
From: Marengo, Iowa
The initial designation, at least by marketing, supposedly was the weight of the chassis, sans body and extras. The heavier the chassis, the stronger it was supposed to be.
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2004 | 08:05 PM
  #4  
cpe41's Avatar
cpe41
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 339
Likes: 1
From: north central Indiana
Hmmm... Interesting. I had been told many, many years ago that it was originally an indicator of load capacity. This is the first I've ever heard of the "frame weight" thing.
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2004 | 08:24 PM
  #5  
CowboyBilly9Mile's Avatar
CowboyBilly9Mile
Post Fiend
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,940
Likes: 2
From: Eastern WA
Payload (load capacity) = GVWR minus curb weight.
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2004 | 09:09 PM
  #6  
fellro86's Avatar
fellro86
Hotshot
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 11,697
Likes: 3
From: Marengo, Iowa
At least that was my understanding, that was the reasoning for swiss cheezing the frames, but it is possible I was mislead, you know how that goes.
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2004 | 09:40 PM
  #7  
johnsdiesel's Avatar
johnsdiesel
Post Fiend
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,324
Likes: 1
From: Denton,TX
Originally Posted by cpe41
Hmmm... Interesting. I had been told many, many years ago that it was originally an indicator of load capacity. This is the first I've ever heard of the "frame weight" thing.
You're correct, it never had anything to do with truck weight. It had to do with payload. The same designations are still used except the standards for 1/2 ton payload, for example, have gone up quite a bit. If it had to do with truck weight the payload would be almost zero. A 1000 lb truck would probably max out with passengers in that scenario.

Anyway..........

You are right, it has to do with payload, not truck weight.
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2004 | 03:30 PM
  #8  
benwantland's Avatar
benwantland
Elder User
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Originally Posted by fellro86
At least that was my understanding, that was the reasoning for swiss cheezing the frames, but it is possible I was mislead, you know how that goes.
I imagine that was just to make things lighter for mileage and emissions purposes. They did anything and everything back in those days...
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-7

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Aug 31, 2004 | 03:41 PM
  #9  
dhermesc's Avatar
dhermesc
Posting Guru
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 0
From: Near Wamego KS
To me a 1/2 ton is a pickup, a 1 ton is a truck.
 
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2004 | 10:32 AM
  #10  
77fordguy's Avatar
77fordguy
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
1/2 ton - you can put 1000 lbs. in the bed
3/4 ton - you can put 1500 lbs. in the bed
1 ton - you can put 2000 lbs. in the bed

etc...
 
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2004 | 10:39 AM
  #11  
biggieou's Avatar
biggieou
Elder User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
From: Ravenna/Athens
Originally Posted by 77fordguy
1/2 ton - you can put 1000 lbs. in the bed
3/4 ton - you can put 1500 lbs. in the bed
1 ton - you can put 2000 lbs. in the bed

etc...
Thats not true either. Ive seen 1/2tons easily pull/handle 2000, its the stopping thats an experience in itself. I just hauled 2 grand worth of scrap metal in my 78 150. It actually pulled and accelerated better under the load. But like has been said earlier, I think that 1/2 tons are lighter duty pickups, 3/4 tons are inbetween and 1 tons are your big boys. The suspensions beef up, but the only real thing I wish my 1/2 ton had that it doesnt are BIGGER brakes, LOL.
 
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2004 | 11:14 AM
  #12  
johnsdiesel's Avatar
johnsdiesel
Post Fiend
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,324
Likes: 1
From: Denton,TX
Originally Posted by 77fordguy
1/2 ton - you can put 1000 lbs. in the bed
3/4 ton - you can put 1500 lbs. in the bed
1 ton - you can put 2000 lbs. in the bed

etc...
That's what it meant in the "old days," but the classifications have been kept around while the payloads have drastically increased. The new F150 can haul more than 1 ton in the right configuration.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fat Fendered Ford
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
7
Jun 3, 2013 11:59 PM
36th Tom
1947 and Older Ford Trucks
9
Jul 27, 2012 06:49 AM
Fat Fendered Ford
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
1
Oct 30, 2003 05:26 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:41 AM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE