When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have to agree with allanhillard, you have to do your homework when looking at products. I did do the research and I know not to believe the hype that comes with products. I tlaked with friends who are in the tire business and they stated you cannot go wrong with the revos. They also stated sure the LTXs are just as good but are a little pricey. I had the LTXs on my 01 expy and they were excellent. I just decided to look for something a little less costly but just as good. So far I am pleased with my choice.
I had a set of Michelin Cross Terrains on my 2000 Expy. They held up well and did good in all weather. Had them out on the beach and they worked well on sand too. Snow was also good.
Are the LTX's better than those? If so are they more expensine?
I have a 2004 Expy with the Contitacs on it that I'm really not impressed with. They break loose in rain all the time, even if I just give it a little gas to get into traffic.
They need rebalancing constantly. Every 7,000 miles or so. That's how I get around the vibration problems.
My Michelins were balanced once in 28,000 miles before I noticed they needed it again.
So far the LTX's seem to fit, ride and handle the water well. Here Down East (Eastern North Carolina) you never know when gully washers will hit. I think I'll be happy as long as my wife keeps from hitting the brick retaining wall! Ride feels better already, which is probably part mental.
If you're looking at Michelins go with the LTX M/S over the Michelin Cross Terrains. The LTX are great tires and have a history of going 60K miles. The Cross Terrains are higher (so most shops will push these) but you will not get the same wear. I have LTX M/S on my Explorer and Cross Terrains on my Expedition. Check the Explorer forum and you will see. And I had more than one tire shop rep admit that the LTX M/S are a better buy for the money and last longer.
I am new to the forum and came across this thread on tires and noticed the negative comments about the factory Continental Contitrac TR's which are what's on my 04 XLT w/AdvanceTrac, 4x4, 5.4. This is our first Expedition and mainly driven by my wife during the week and myself on weekends. During the week I commute to work in one of two 1970 Olds Cutlass' (one green, one brown) which I prefer over all other vehicles. Our XLT has 19K miles and the tires have functioned perfectly, rain or not. We have driven up to 90 mph for short spurts and the ride is smooth as glass. My wife took three other ladies to Atlanta from Jackson, MS, for a retreat and in a thunderstorm the entire trip. The traction and handling were fine. Tires rotated at 5K miles with each oil change. No problems. Maybe this tire set was manufactured with good quality control. Still very deep tread and even wear showing on all four tires. No complaints so far. We really are enjoying our first Expedition and it gets 14.5 mpg in the city whereas my Cutlass' get 13.0 (4 bbl) and 14.0 (2 bbl) Rocket 350's.
Go back to the tire rack and read their ratings. The Yokohama HT-S is the highest rated tire in this class. I just put 4 on my 99 eb and they are the best tires i have ever bought. They are quiet great in the snow and handle great.
I was considering the Revo's but then I saw the Kumho on TireRack. I read the reviews and looked at the rating and they seem to be a good tire. They only run about $86 each also. Now I'm just waiting for a free shipping special to kick in and i will purchase those.
What sold me on those tires was the reviews. I saw alot of them for Expy's which help me make my decision.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.