Notices
1999 - 2016 Super Duty 1999 to 2016 Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty with diesel V8 and gas V8 and V10 engines
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

Air Filters?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 20, 2004 | 04:28 PM
  #16  
papatrq's Avatar
papatrq
Freshman User
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
For the 1st 15K used Motorcraft. Oil samples showed slight amount of dirt. Well below danger levels. Switched to K&N. Oil samples came back much better and stayed that way. Sample every 7,000 miles. Have run over 100K and still strong. Just broke in. Punched a 3" hole in plastic grille right in front of fresh air intake to allow cooler air in. Seems logical that it would draw cooler air instead of air drawn around raditor assy. Talked to Ford, they said the reason they opted not to do that from factory was a chance of plugging with snow in certain conditions or applications. Don't plan on that being a problem. They seemed to like the idea. Only thing is that you do catch more small critters. Anyway seems to work for me.
 
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2004 | 05:33 PM
  #17  
Lashlaroo's Avatar
Lashlaroo
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Don't use a K&N with the 6.o liter diesel! Too many dust type particles get through and interfear with the variable vanes in the turbo. Factory type filter only..
 
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2004 | 06:45 PM
  #18  
papatrq's Avatar
papatrq
Freshman User
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Thanks, Ill keep that in mind. I hope to order a 2005 later this year. Wanted them to get bugs worked out first. May even wait for the 2006
 
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2004 | 02:28 PM
  #19  
PeteC's Avatar
PeteC
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Does anybody have any proof (independent tests, worn out engines...) that the K&Ns let more dirt in?
 
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2004 | 02:51 PM
  #20  
papatrq's Avatar
papatrq
Freshman User
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
I certainly don't. I've been VERY happy with my K&N's over the years. Don't know if they even show an application for the 6.0
 
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2004 | 03:01 PM
  #21  
papatrq's Avatar
papatrq
Freshman User
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Exclamation

Originally Posted by Lashlaroo
Don't use a K&N with the 6.o liter diesel! Too many dust type particles get through and interfear with the variable vanes in the turbo. Factory type filter only..
Well Lasharoo, Turns out that K&N doesn't even make an air filter for that application. Where did you get your inside information on the lack of effeciency on a filter that as of this date does not exist?
 
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2004 | 03:12 PM
  #22  
johnsdiesel's Avatar
johnsdiesel
Post Fiend
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,324
Likes: 1
From: Denton,TX
Originally Posted by PeteC
Does anybody have any proof (independent tests, worn out engines...) that the K&Ns let more dirt in?
Yes, and it's based on their own statistics. K&N claims a filtration rate of between 97-99%. Their filters tend to filter right around 97% when clean and get more efficient when dirty. Other testing done by other companies seems to be right in line with 97% for a clean filter. I don't think K&N lies about their own filtration rate on their website. On the other hand, the Donaldson filters in the 6.0, AIS, and Tymar filter at 99.8% when clean and 99.9% with some dirt on the filter media. Again, these are not my numbers for the K&N filter, they are posted on the K&N website.

From K&N:

Our testing has demonstrated that on average, K&N air filters have an overall efficiency rating of between 97 and 99%.
 

Last edited by johnsdiesel; Jul 21, 2004 at 03:27 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2004 | 06:20 PM
  #23  
papatrq's Avatar
papatrq
Freshman User
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
I'm not disputing your numbers. My problem is for someone to tell someone else in language that a person would have you believe that their firsthand knowledge is that K&N should not be used on a 6.0 because it will cause damage to the turbo, when in fact there is no application so how can that be proven or disproven.
It has been my personal experience that a K&N is more efficient in keeping dirt out of my 7.3 and my other engines based on oil sample reports as compared to OEM.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-1

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-4

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-6

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
Old Jul 21, 2004 | 07:19 PM
  #24  
johnsdiesel's Avatar
johnsdiesel
Post Fiend
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,324
Likes: 1
From: Denton,TX
Originally Posted by papatrq
I'm not disputing your numbers. My problem is for someone to tell someone else in language that a person would have you believe that their firsthand knowledge is that K&N should not be used on a 6.0 because it will cause damage to the turbo, when in fact there is no application so how can that be proven or disproven.
It has been my personal experience that a K&N is more efficient in keeping dirt out of my 7.3 and my other engines based on oil sample reports as compared to OEM.
Once again, they are NOT my numbers, they are K&N's numbers, which show their filter to be far less efficient. I have know several people who have had damaged turbos due to K&N filters. Use the search function on this website and you'll come across some of these people, and yes, they did know how to install and maintain a K&N filter.

No offense, but I think it's crazy that you won't even believe the numbers from K&N themselves.
 
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2004 | 07:29 PM
  #25  
jdadamsjr's Avatar
jdadamsjr
Post Fiend
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,314
Likes: 4
For those that say the 6-oh K&N air filters don't exist....
Choctaw Bob has had one on his 6-oh for at least 6 months... and his blackstone reports show less silicone than averages and not much more than my stock filtered 6-oh does on a lot less miles

so I'm just not sure WHAT to believe !

Have had K&N's for years and never had a dusted engine personally,
no matter what I do though, I'm just getting my monies worth out of this stock filter first...
 

Last edited by jdadamsjr; Jul 21, 2004 at 07:38 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2004 | 08:14 PM
  #26  
Choctaw Bob's Avatar
Choctaw Bob
Postmaster
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,359
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Originally Posted by Lashlaroo
Don't use a K&N with the 6.o liter diesel! Too many dust type particles get through and interfear with the variable vanes in the turbo. Factory type filter only..
Wrong!

I finally have the ammo to put this false rumor to rest once and for all!

Check my Gallery!

I have a K&N FIPK on my 6.0 PSD. It made 387 HP and 728 Ft Lb of Torque with a Predator and no other mods.

My Blackstone oil sample showed a silicone content of nearly half normal levels.

The K&N provides superior filtration and more power at the same time!
 
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2004 | 08:16 PM
  #27  
Choctaw Bob's Avatar
Choctaw Bob
Postmaster
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,359
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Originally Posted by johnsdiesel
The factory filter also does a much better job filtering than any of the reusable filters. The Donaldson specs are 99.8% for a clean filter, 99.9% when it has some dirt on it. K&N's numbers, as posted on their own website, range from 97-99%. That doesn't seem like much, but it is. Take a clean Donaldson paper filter against a clean K&N filter. The K&N is letting in 15 times more dirt/dust. Again, not my numbers, but the numbers posted by K&N and Donaldson.
The test data simply doesn't support this. K&N Posted independent lab data showing their filters filter within .001% of the stock test filters.

My oil test data proves that my K&N KIPK filters better than the stock filter.
 

Last edited by Choctaw Bob; Jul 21, 2004 at 08:18 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2004 | 08:32 PM
  #28  
johnsdiesel's Avatar
johnsdiesel
Post Fiend
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,324
Likes: 1
From: Denton,TX
Originally Posted by Choctaw Bob
The test data simply doesn't support this. K&N Posted independent lab data showing their filters filter within .001% of the stock test filters.

My oil test data proves that my K&N KIPK filters better than the stock filter.
Bob, I'm not disputing anyone's choice to use a K&N filter, but my data is based on K&N's own figures and the figures from Donaldson for their filters. All the independant tests I've seen support the numbers that K&N posts on their website. I don't think they underestimate their own product with their numbers, but their numbers are well below those of paper filters.
 
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2004 | 08:40 PM
  #29  
OMCUSNR's Avatar
OMCUSNR
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Medford, Oregon
Red face

Well, I'll put my flame retardent undies on first, here...

I just got through a VERY interesting read over at the diesel place for Damx's. They were able to cajole an independant testing lab (actually the firm that makes filter test stands) to run tests on Ummmmm 7 or 8 different stock & aftermarket filters (unfortunatly, Donaldson didn't make the list). It was a bit long & generated much discussion.

Seems the factory (AC/Delco) paper filter held up the best.

These were tests run just like the manufactur's run & they posted the results out there for all the world to see.

From those results, and what the guys over @ flatrate say, I'll stick with the OEM Donaldson. I can get about 6 for the price of the PRO-guard 7.
 
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2004 | 08:41 PM
  #30  
johnsdiesel's Avatar
johnsdiesel
Post Fiend
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,324
Likes: 1
From: Denton,TX
This thread is turning out like almost every other air intake thread. I guess that's why I usually recommend using the search function now when this topic comes up.

Bob, if you really want a lot more air and filtration you should consider retrofitting a Tymar intake for your truck.
 

Last edited by johnsdiesel; Jul 21, 2004 at 08:46 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:51 AM.

story-0
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-02 21:45:57


VIEW MORE
story-1
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-3
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-5
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-6
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-7
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-9
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE