351M vs. 351W
#16
Certainly the 300 6 cylinder has quite a reputation for reliability and torque. If you are going to the trouble to swap things out I would only consider the 351W. It is by far the easiest and most popular around to make torque and hp. I would not have much good to say about the 351M/400 having owned one years ago, although in all fairness, I had no trouble with it. If the 6 is doing OK why are you switching? The C and M motors are not worth the effort if you want ease and reliable torque. In fact, the 6 banger you have in may be the best bet yet. Have you really factored in what you want from this swap? Having done engine swaps in the past, I can tell you, be ready for a lot of work and unexpected problems.
#17
#18
#19
the 400 m build up article is on this site in the techical articles section it is a good read. I had the 351 m in my 77 f250 and it had lots of power. The 351m and 400m are the same blocks and heads, and intakes, (put a 400 crank rods, and pistons in the 351 m makes it a 400 cube monster with tons of torque. The heads will interchange from a 351c to a 400m/ 351m motor.
I agree the 351w is indeed the easiest option for a bronco setup, I have heard great reviews of 351w heads on a 302 block (lil opening of cooling passages required) Too bad it didnt have a 302 in it then i'd suggest putting a 351w crank in it with the 351w heads and make a 347 stroker motor. SWEET.
My favourite motor for performance/ fuel savings in the old trucks was the 390 (stroked 352) had gobs of power and decent gas mileage. My 351m was a pig on gas, passing everything but a gas station.
Sorry i kinda ran off topic
G'day
Stoney
I agree the 351w is indeed the easiest option for a bronco setup, I have heard great reviews of 351w heads on a 302 block (lil opening of cooling passages required) Too bad it didnt have a 302 in it then i'd suggest putting a 351w crank in it with the 351w heads and make a 347 stroker motor. SWEET.
My favourite motor for performance/ fuel savings in the old trucks was the 390 (stroked 352) had gobs of power and decent gas mileage. My 351m was a pig on gas, passing everything but a gas station.
Sorry i kinda ran off topic
G'day
Stoney
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gettler
335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland
46
12-16-2019 02:51 PM
429 merc
Manitoba / Saskatchewan Chapter
21
06-30-2015 06:37 PM
ranger1985
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
8
06-19-2010 07:57 PM
rsalter66
335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland
1
05-28-2007 01:35 PM