Notices
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 2003 - 2007 F250, F350 pickup and F350+ Cab Chassis, 2003 - 2005 Excursion and 2003 - 2009 van

6.0l Mpg

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 27, 2004 | 02:51 PM
  #1  
Nighthawk's Avatar
Nighthawk
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: chicago
Red face 6.0l Mpg

going to buy a new pickmup and was considering gas. since i'll be towing at some point figured why take the chance and i am seriously looking at the diesel in the F250. i see mpg posted in various forums but would ask those of you with 6.0's to let me know your real life experience, city, highway, towing. Really, really appreciate your thoughts on if you'd do it again. THANKS!
 

Last edited by Nighthawk; May 27, 2004 at 02:55 PM.
Reply
Old May 27, 2004 | 02:56 PM
  #2  
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim
FTE Leadership Emeritus
20 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 161,999
Likes: 75
From: 3rd Rock
Club FTE Gold Member
Pulling over 19k total (truck and trailer) over 11.5k passes.......4 times on one trip.
I averaged 9.1.......just fine for me. I run 75 on the flats and the trailer has a huge frontal area.
Miles of open space in he southwest.
Had a v-10 pulling 1.8k smaller trailer.........it averaged (over the time I towed with it) 4.9 mpg.
It sucked, and had no HP compared to the 6.0

I have averaged 11.9 when the cruse is on and I am not pushing…………….but what fun is that.
At 68 it will get 12.3, just takes for ever to get somewhere when the speed limit is 75

I know it is not supposed to matter to any turbo motor………altitude that is…….but I live at 5995 and yes I see better MPG at sea livel than at 6k.
 
Reply
Old May 27, 2004 | 03:07 PM
  #3  
03 SuperDuty FX4's Avatar
03 SuperDuty FX4
Junior User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: Manchaca, Texas
Highway driving I get 17 mpg and in the city I get 15mpg unloaded. Those mpgs with a heavy right foot. While pulling my bobcat I average 9-11 mpg.
 
Reply
Old May 27, 2004 | 03:09 PM
  #4  
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim
FTE Leadership Emeritus
20 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 161,999
Likes: 75
From: 3rd Rock
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by 03 SuperDuty FX4
Highway driving I get 17 mpg and in the city I get 15mpg unloaded. Those mpgs with a heavy right foot. While pulling my bobcat I average 9-11 mpg.
What does you trailer and bobcat weigh............curious
 
Reply
Old May 27, 2004 | 03:54 PM
  #5  
grov58's Avatar
grov58
New User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
around town i average about 13-14 and on highway i average about 16.5-17.5 at 73-78 mph. if i set the cruise on 60 on flat ground i will get 21+..hope this can help...btw this is all hand calculated although my overhead is surprisingly accurate...within .5 mpg.
 
Reply
Old May 27, 2004 | 04:54 PM
  #6  
utahtom's Avatar
utahtom
Posting Guru
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 2
From: Northern Utah
Driving at 4,500 ft elevation, I average 15.5 to 16.5 mpg combined city & hwy. With studded winter snow tires it drops to 14-15 mpg. On summer roadtrips travelling 75-85 mph I average 18.5 to 19.8 mpg, even in 100 degree plus temps. Pulling a 7,500 lb load (boat & trailer) average 12.5-14.5 mpg with the wind being a big factor since my boat is not very aerodynamic! The 03 F250 CC 6.0 Auto has 28,900 miles. Hope this info helps.
 
Reply
Old May 27, 2004 | 05:49 PM
  #7  
03 SuperDuty FX4's Avatar
03 SuperDuty FX4
Junior User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: Manchaca, Texas
Tim my bobcat and tralier weigh around 9-11K lbs total. It just depends on what attachments I am hauling around.
 
Reply
Old May 27, 2004 | 06:38 PM
  #8  
wiz's Avatar
wiz
New User
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
wiz

04w04engineF350 4x4 cab&chassis dual r w w/9ft flat bed w one cross body toolbox. 3:73 rear, 6 speed manual.

Empty- 15.5-17.5mixed driving(have gotten 18 once recently)-seems to be rising(I'm at about 10,000mi). I have kept meticulous records with almost every tank since purchase. Have gotten 15mpg with 100 miles under load of 300 mi. driven towing 10,000 lbs round bales of hay in hilly terrain(300 miles from top off to top off with 100miles under load)- the cab and chassis comes with a 39 gallon tank and has over a 600 mi. range) Lowest I have gotten with mostly loaded miles-same load as above has been 13+.

Note to Tim: I had a CAC tube blow off at 7,000 mi. They towed it in, kept it for ten days and flashed the motor after replacing the tube and clamps. Might add after I asked both mechanic who was working on the truck and the service manager not to. So far (2,000 mi) the fuel mileage has not declined. Was told the proverbial "FMC said we had to do it". This was a minor problem.

I love the truck. It has enough power and torque so that it literally doesn't seem to recognize when the ac is on-no difference in mileage, and it doesn't seem to recognize it is pulling anything till you get over a 5,000 lb trailer load. It will pull most "decent grade" primary mountainous highways in overdrive with that kind of load. Hope this helps
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old May 27, 2004 | 06:47 PM
  #9  
tristankc's Avatar
tristankc
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
From: Second star to the right!
Originally Posted by Tim Lamkin
I know it is not supposed to matter to any turbo motor………altitude that is…….but I live at 5995 and yes I see better MPG at sea livel than at 6k.
It isn't that altitude does not matter for a turbocharged engine... The deal is that turbocharged engines just are not affected as badly to high altitude as a N/A counterpart is.

I have raced turbo's and N/A's at 4000 plus feet. Both definitely lack power. The N/A engine feel like your running minus a cylinder or two. The turbo, where not near as bad, still lacks a noticeable and considerable amout of power.

To the topic at hand, I get 13 mpg in the city, no matter how light or hard I drive it. Most of my city driving is trips of 5 miles or less. On the highway, empty, I get 15 mpg @ 75mph+. I have no data for speeds slower than that. Pulling an open car trailer, 5500#, I get 13 mpg @ 75 mph+. Same trailer @ 65-70 mph, I get 14 mpg. Pulling a 30' eclosed trailer, 12000#, I get 7.5 mpg @ 75 mph+. Same trailer at 65-70 mph, 8.5 mpg.
 
Reply
Old May 27, 2004 | 07:06 PM
  #10  
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim
FTE Leadership Emeritus
20 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 161,999
Likes: 75
From: 3rd Rock
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by 03 SuperDuty FX4
Tim my bobcat and tralier weigh around 9-11K lbs total. It just depends on what attachments I am hauling around.
Other than the aero dynamic properties of a shoe-box (see gallery) we are very close to weighing the same. Our MPG is close also.
Do you fell it is acceptable MPG?
 
Reply
Old May 27, 2004 | 07:12 PM
  #11  
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim
FTE Leadership Emeritus
20 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 161,999
Likes: 75
From: 3rd Rock
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by tristankc
It isn't that altitude does not matter for a turbocharged engine... The deal is that turbocharged engines just are not affected as badly to high altitude as a N/A counterpart is.

I have raced turbo's and N/A's at 4000 plus feet. Both definitely lack power. The N/A engine feel like your running minus a cylinder or two. The turbo, where not near as bad, still lacks a noticeable and considerable amout of power.

To the topic at hand, I get 13 mpg in the city, no matter how light or hard I drive it. Most of my city driving is trips of 5 miles or less. On the highway, empty, I get 15 mpg @ 75mph+. I have no data for speeds slower than that. Pulling an open car trailer, 5500#, I get 13 mpg @ 75 mph+. Same trailer @ 65-70 mph, I get 14 mpg. Pulling a 30' eclosed trailer, 12000#, I get 7.5 mpg @ 75 mph+. Same trailer at 65-70 mph, 8.5 mpg.



OUTSTANDING data..........real world stuff.
Supports my own finding of speed = a bit more out of the o-fuel tank!!!
Same question...Do you fell it is acceptable MPG?
No BS about what the salesperson said...just your thoughts
 
Reply
Old May 27, 2004 | 07:41 PM
  #12  
03 SuperDuty FX4's Avatar
03 SuperDuty FX4
Junior User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: Manchaca, Texas
Tim I do think the mpgs are acceptable becuase those figures are with a heavy right foot. I wish my 02 5.4L would get these mpgs and have the power that these trucks have. I know I would get better mpgs if I was easier on the right foot but what fun is that.
 
Reply
Old May 27, 2004 | 07:45 PM
  #13  
tristankc's Avatar
tristankc
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
From: Second star to the right!
Do I feel the mpg is acceptable?

In the real world and given that I have NEVER been able to get the minimum EPA range out of any vehicle I have ever driven, I would say yes, it is acceptable. It is definitely on the lower side of average with everyone else.

Was I expecting something more when I bought it?

Definitely yes. I was really looking for the upper teens to low 20's, empty on the highway. But I know now that it was probably an unrealistic expectation, especially given my driving style. So there was a little bit of disappointment there at first, but I quickly got over it.

The bottom line is that it is a great truck, with boo-koo's of power, that doesn't even hardly flinch when pulling 12000# up a 6% grade. I have come to the realization that the fuel economy is what it is. No amout of complaining or whining is going to change it. So, you can either live with it or get rid of it. I love my truck, fuel economy in all.
 
Reply
Old May 27, 2004 | 07:55 PM
  #14  
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim
FTE Leadership Emeritus
20 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 161,999
Likes: 75
From: 3rd Rock
Club FTE Gold Member
Thank you both for your honesty, I too believe it is acceptable. Yes we always want more………..but HP/TQ comes at a cost and that is fuel. Mine climbing a10% grade did accelerate to the point of disaster If I would have stayed in it. It is truly unbelievable how good these trucks pull. A friend has a chipped, piped, 7.3 and he cannot even being to do what mine does.

So many are complaining about MPG, these are 7k trucks with big HP/TQ numbers, only way to get there is through the use of fuel.

By the way mine has once, (only drove it once withour the trailer) and at 68MPH received 20.1
My foot was not part of that, I was using the cruse control.
 
Reply
Old May 27, 2004 | 08:28 PM
  #15  
Hayapower!'s Avatar
Hayapower!
Elder User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 920
Likes: 2
From: CA
Just finished a 400 mile trip last week.. First one.. Drove like a 4 ton Lexus!! Unloaded, 78 mph most of the way with 'little' round town driving, and about an hour with A/C on.. Bit of a headwind on the way, calm on the way back.. I got 17MPG..Not bad, but if I had gotten 18 or better, I'd been a bit happier!! It's never enough!! I'm going to do the same trip next week with the Predator at 65HP tune to see if/and how much of an improvement it makes..
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:04 AM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE