Notices

4.6 or 5.4 engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 30, 2004 | 03:30 PM
  #1  
Ranger Louie's Avatar
Ranger Louie
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
20 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Question 4.6 or 5.4 engine

I'm looking at bying a new supercrew but I'm not sure which motor to go with.I was quoted a price of 30,999 for the 4.6 and 31,700 for a 5.4 ltr.Which gets better gas mileage?Which is the better engine?Need your input soon.Thankyou,Louie.
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2004 | 04:08 PM
  #2  
PaulC's Avatar
PaulC
Posting Guru
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,297
Likes: 0
The SuperCrew is a lot of truck for a 4.6. The 5.4 will have better resale and real-world fuel economy will be extremely close, if not identical. The extra $701 is well worth it.
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2004 | 10:42 PM
  #3  
ML1983's Avatar
ML1983
Freshman User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
For the cost difference I would go with the 5.4L V-8. The gas mileage difference isn't much, but I understand power is alot more satisfying with the 5.4L.
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2004 | 11:44 PM
  #4  
LxMan1's Avatar
LxMan1
Moderator
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 22,436
Likes: 17
From: Louisville,Ky.
Ditto, especially if you are going to do any hauling. I would also recommend either 3.73 or 4.10 gears to go along with the 5.4L.
 
Reply
Old May 2, 2004 | 11:04 PM
  #5  
calgary_redneck's Avatar
calgary_redneck
Senior User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Both the 5.4 and the 4.6 are pretty guttless so you might as well go for the bigger one and give it all the help it can get
 
Reply
Old May 3, 2004 | 04:41 PM
  #6  
Andysutt's Avatar
Andysutt
Postmaster
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,775
Likes: 2
From: Conway Arkansas
Originally Posted by calgary_redneck
Both the 5.4 and the 4.6 are pretty guttless so you might as well go for the bigger one and give it all the help it can get

I don't know where you get your information, but the 4.6 and the 5.4s are not gutless
In my 97 F-150 Extended cab, Ive beaten a few chevy X-cabs that had 350s and most of them hard exhaust/cams/intakes etc
So, they hold their own
As for in the S-crew Id get the 5.4l or a Diesel
As like was said before... better resale, and for the extra couple hundred bucks you get a bit more power
 
Reply
Old May 3, 2004 | 05:31 PM
  #7  
superrangerman2002's Avatar
superrangerman2002
Logistics Pro
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,821
Likes: 19
From: South Dakota
Originally Posted by calgary_redneck
Both the 5.4 and the 4.6 are pretty guttless so you might as well go for the bigger one and give it all the help it can get
Come on.

I've read through all your posts, and it seems that you are not interested in helping.

I even wonder if you have any knowledge of either engine, or is it just the muddled rumors of what you heard from a friend of a friend?

Back to the point:

IMO you'll like the power of the 5.4L in a S-Crew (which for all intensive purposes is not that much heavier than a standard F-150), and drop in a intake and a tuner, you'll be smiles for miles.
 
Reply
Old May 3, 2004 | 09:21 PM
  #8  
calgary_redneck's Avatar
calgary_redneck
Senior User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Andysutt
I don't know where you get your information, but the 4.6 and the 5.4s are not gutless
In my 97 F-150 Extended cab, Ive beaten a few chevy X-cabs that had 350s and most of them hard exhaust/cams/intakes etc
So, they hold their own
As for in the S-crew Id get the 5.4l or a Diesel
As like was said before... better resale, and for the extra couple hundred bucks you get a bit more power

Lol perhaps you need to go research the 0-60 time of the 5.4 compaired to the vortec 350 equipt units I'm sure you will find it is very competitive if no slightly faster with definetly better fuel economy which I find particularly amusing seeing how the 350 sb is essentually a design which dates back to the mid 50's. If you wanna see something more dramatic compair the 0-60 times of a 99 5.3 equipt chev against a 5.4 triton.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old May 3, 2004 | 09:36 PM
  #9  
Andysutt's Avatar
Andysutt
Postmaster
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,775
Likes: 2
From: Conway Arkansas
Originally Posted by calgary_redneck
Lol perhaps you need to go research the 0-60 time of the 5.4 compaired to the vortec 350 equipt units I'm sure you will find it is very competitive if no slightly faster with definetly better fuel economy which I find particularly amusing seeing how the 350 sb is essentually a design which dates back to the mid 50's. If you wanna see something more dramatic compair the 0-60 times of a 99 5.3 equipt chev against a 5.4 triton.
Oh, so your saying it was a fluke that my stock 4.6L in an extended cab truck beat several 350s with cams/intakes/headers/exhaust?
Kinda weird....
Only add on I have is flowmasters... big wow

Also... the 350 may have been designed years and years ago... but the vortec is different than the regular 350s (not by a lot however)
and they are fuel injected and such... So the mid 50s 350s are different than the 350s of today... nice comparison buddy

lol, I like reading your responses however as you are here just to badmouth ford... Well, its not working
 
Reply
Old May 3, 2004 | 10:33 PM
  #10  
Indybroncoman's Avatar
Indybroncoman
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
Originally Posted by ML1983
For the cost difference I would go with the 5.4L V-8. The gas mileage difference isn't much, but I understand power is alot more satisfying with the 5.4L.
I'm with him. Nobody complains of having too much power. My wife's Expy has the 4.6 which is fine for her (it hauls groceries and our two Great Danes) but if I drove it I'd have to have the 5.4. I would not call either engine gutless. I would say that the 4.6 has no business in a large truck (but Ford should offer it in the Ranger) and that Ford could-and should-get more out of the 5.4.
 
Reply
Old May 3, 2004 | 10:45 PM
  #11  
calgary_redneck's Avatar
calgary_redneck
Senior User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
[QUOTE=Also... the 350 may have been designed years and years ago... but the vortec is different than the regular 350s (not by a lot however)
and they are fuel injected and such... So the mid 50s 350s are different than the 350s of today... nice comparison buddy

lol, I like reading your responses however as you are here just to badmouth ford... Well, its not working[/QUOTE]


Lol well if you bothered to take the time to read what I wrote or learn information you would know that the 350 didn't come out till 68, I said the esential design of the small block chev dates back to then. And yes its not exactly the same the vortec heads are a modern design and its gona multi port fuel injection exeta but its still pretty damn close and almost everything interchanges between that of the new and that of the old. Hence my point of it being essentually the same engine
 
Reply
Old May 3, 2004 | 11:15 PM
  #12  
Andysutt's Avatar
Andysutt
Postmaster
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,775
Likes: 2
From: Conway Arkansas
[QUOTE=calgary_redneck]
Originally Posted by Also... the 350 may have been designed years and years ago... but the vortec is different than the regular 350s (not by a lot however)
and they are fuel injected and such... So the mid 50s 350s are different than the 350s of today... nice comparison buddy

lol, I like reading your responses however as you are here just to badmouth ford... Well, its not working[/QUOTE


Lol well if you bothered to take the time to read what I wrote or learn information you would know that the 350 didn't come out till 68, I said the esential design of the small block chev dates back to then. And yes its not exactly the same the vortec heads are a modern design and its gona multi port fuel injection exeta but its still pretty damn close and almost everything interchanges between that of the new and that of the old. Hence my point of it being essentually the same engine
I was going by what you said... I meant the design, not the 350 itself. My bad.

But anyways, Im thru replying to you on here...
Id recommend spreading your knowledge at a chevy site, because not a lot of people come to a ford website looking for chevy info
 
Reply
Old May 4, 2004 | 12:30 AM
  #13  
Racerguy's Avatar
Racerguy
Hotshot
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 12,679
Likes: 15
From: BC, Canada
hmmm I could have sworn they stopped making Chevy 350s a few years ago now.
 
Reply
Old May 4, 2004 | 01:00 AM
  #14  
Mil1ion's Avatar
Mil1ion
New User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 0
Likes: 24
The biggest difference between Ford Engines & GM engines is that Ford Engine produce their greatest torque at lower RPM's.
I like that ***Just off Idle.... Power****.

If there are any more personal comments directed at anyone by anyone, there will be consequences.
 
Reply
Old May 4, 2004 | 08:34 AM
  #15  
Andysutt's Avatar
Andysutt
Postmaster
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,775
Likes: 2
From: Conway Arkansas
Originally Posted by Racerguy
hmmm I could have sworn they stopped making Chevy 350s a few years ago now.
They did... they put 325/326/327's whatever they are in the new trucks and such
The vette and such still use a 350 I think
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:15 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE