K&N Filters
#1
K&N Filters
I was told today by the Local NAPA parts house that a K & N filter or any other oil soaked filter will cause oil to coat a sensor in the intake pipe that will cause problems, and I should use only the stock Ford filter or equivelant. Sure would like to know if any one is using the K&N or similar filter with good or bad results.
#2
i was getting ready to get one...i could be very, very wrong but IMO the guy is crazy. The only sensor i am aware of in the intake pipe is the mass air flow sensor; these are in just about any new vehicle, gas or diesel, so by that token it would be bad to put a k+n on anything. That just doesnt fly. Im sure k and n or any other company would be smarter than that.
#3
Originally Posted by cwqueen
I was told today by the Local NAPA parts house that a K & N filter or any other oil soaked filter will cause oil to coat a sensor in the intake pipe that will cause problems, and I should use only the stock Ford filter or equivelant. Sure would like to know if any one is using the K&N or similar filter with good or bad results.
#5
MAF (Mass Air Flow) sensors have two wires in them, one is heated to a certain temp and the amount of electricity used to maintain that temp is the indication of the amount of air flowing past it. Excessive oil from any source can make the MAF think there is less air coming in than actual flow. The 6.0L MAF is upstream of the normal oil reversion and the only way to increase the amount of air flow though any filter, is to make the filter larger or more porous. More porous means more dirt!!!!!
#6
Originally Posted by johnsdiesel
There was just a post in the 7.3 forum about a dusted turbo from a K&N. Do you really want to risk a new engine for the K&N?
#7
All the dusted engines I have seen were from poor filter sealing or lack of maint. I have seen K&N filters in 7.3L not sealing in the housing, and a visible dirt track passing by the edge of the filter! I have seen lots more completely filthy K&N filters that were so restricted the air tube would collapse on accel. You can't just install and forget!!
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by Fordtech1
MAF (Mass Air Flow) sensors have two wires in them, one is heated to a certain temp and the amount of electricity used to maintain that temp is the indication of the amount of air flowing past it. Excessive oil from any source can make the MAF think there is less air coming in than actual flow. The 6.0L MAF is upstream of the normal oil reversion and the only way to increase the amount of air flow though any filter, is to make the filter larger or more porous. More porous means more dirt!!!!!
#9
Ask Toreador Diesel what he thinks about K&N filters. He reported last week that his turbo had MAJOR damage. As Fordtech1 said, you can't decrease restriction over the same surface area without also decreasing filtration. Do you honestly believe what K&N says on their website? Any company will tell you why their product is the best in order to make money. I'm basing my information on real world information. These are not rumors and you can find plenty of first hand information on this website.
BTW, your stock air filter filters at 99.9%. Do your research before you post a rebuttal (sites other than K&N). Other tests have proven that the K&N filters at a much lower rate when clean and closer to their estimated rate when dirty. Of course when it's dirty it has more restriction. I suggest you do a search over at the diesel stop rather than just reading that letter. Most of the guys there wouldn't put one in their truck.
BTW, your stock air filter filters at 99.9%. Do your research before you post a rebuttal (sites other than K&N). Other tests have proven that the K&N filters at a much lower rate when clean and closer to their estimated rate when dirty. Of course when it's dirty it has more restriction. I suggest you do a search over at the diesel stop rather than just reading that letter. Most of the guys there wouldn't put one in their truck.
Last edited by johnsdiesel; 04-13-2004 at 11:38 PM.
#10
#11
[QUOTE=johnsdiesel]Ask Toreador Diesel what he thinks about K&N filters. He reported last week that his turbo had MAJOR damage.
Ok, wait a second. Major damage from what made it through a properly installed a cared for K&N filter? Come on, give me a break. What made it through the filter, a pebble? Or maybe he was driving through a sand storm? Come on, think about it. I'm not going to sit here and argue weather the K&K filters better than the stock one or not. In fact, I would be willing to say it doesn't. But there is NO WAY anything large enough to damage a turbo is going to be able to make it through a K&N. I have had a side business for four years that builds 600, 700 & 800 rear wheel HP turbo imports, and virtually all of these cars run K&N cone filters. Not one that we have built, or any others that we know of for that matter, have ever had a turbo failure because of the filters. Hell I run TWO (one per turbo) of them on my 630+ RWHP 300 ZX twin turbo, and have for years and they are just fine. And I'm talking about a $6000 set of turbos, so yeah, I guess you could say I trust them. For a truck that sees the off road, or is used on dusty job sites and the like, then no, I probably would not want to use a K&N. But for the truck that is used under "normal" conditions, on the street and highways it would be just fine.
Ok, wait a second. Major damage from what made it through a properly installed a cared for K&N filter? Come on, give me a break. What made it through the filter, a pebble? Or maybe he was driving through a sand storm? Come on, think about it. I'm not going to sit here and argue weather the K&K filters better than the stock one or not. In fact, I would be willing to say it doesn't. But there is NO WAY anything large enough to damage a turbo is going to be able to make it through a K&N. I have had a side business for four years that builds 600, 700 & 800 rear wheel HP turbo imports, and virtually all of these cars run K&N cone filters. Not one that we have built, or any others that we know of for that matter, have ever had a turbo failure because of the filters. Hell I run TWO (one per turbo) of them on my 630+ RWHP 300 ZX twin turbo, and have for years and they are just fine. And I'm talking about a $6000 set of turbos, so yeah, I guess you could say I trust them. For a truck that sees the off road, or is used on dusty job sites and the like, then no, I probably would not want to use a K&N. But for the truck that is used under "normal" conditions, on the street and highways it would be just fine.
#12
OK, so a lot of you 6.0 PSD guys will learn the hard way. Yes, even properly cared for K&N's let too much dust through. Cummins actually warns specifically against the K&N becaust of the damage it can cause. If you take a poll of all the diesel owners over at the diesel stop almost all would recommend against the K&N.
Anyway, I'm done posting on this thread. It's obvious that some people can't be convinced that just because a K&N is good in a gasser that doesn't mean it's OK in a turbo diesel. I'm just trying to provide information from experience and a large cross section of diesel owners to those of you who might own your first diesel.
To each their own. At least we can agree on Ford.
Anyway, I'm done posting on this thread. It's obvious that some people can't be convinced that just because a K&N is good in a gasser that doesn't mean it's OK in a turbo diesel. I'm just trying to provide information from experience and a large cross section of diesel owners to those of you who might own your first diesel.
To each their own. At least we can agree on Ford.
#13
Originally Posted by johnsdiesel
OK, so a lot of you 6.0 PSD guys will learn the hard way. Yes, even properly cared for K&N's let too much dust through. Cummins actually warns specifically against the K&N because of the damage it can cause. If you take a poll of all the diesel owners over at the diesel stop almost all would recommend against the K&N.
Anyway, I'm done posting on this thread. It's obvious that some people can't be convinced that just because a K&N is good in a gasser that doesn't mean it's OK in a turbo diesel. I'm just trying to provide information from experience and a large cross section of diesel owners to those of you who might own your first diesel.
To each their own. At least we can agree on Ford.
Anyway, I'm done posting on this thread. It's obvious that some people can't be convinced that just because a K&N is good in a gasser that doesn't mean it's OK in a turbo diesel. I'm just trying to provide information from experience and a large cross section of diesel owners to those of you who might own your first diesel.
To each their own. At least we can agree on Ford.
#14
Some people just don't want to be confused by the facts. Try
http://www.knfilters.com/facts.htm#WORD
on this page are links to independent lab tests. This proves the fact that K&N air filters provide filtration equal to ot superior to the factory air cleaners.
I have struggled with these same people on this forum who have they minds made up based upon what they read on some flamer site or from their buddy. Their buddys truck could have died from any number of reasons (no test data documentation available)but the data supports the idea that it was NOT the K&N filter.
http://www.knfilters.com/facts.htm#WORD
on this page are links to independent lab tests. This proves the fact that K&N air filters provide filtration equal to ot superior to the factory air cleaners.
I have struggled with these same people on this forum who have they minds made up based upon what they read on some flamer site or from their buddy. Their buddys truck could have died from any number of reasons (no test data documentation available)but the data supports the idea that it was NOT the K&N filter.
#15